Executive Summary — Acts 1–28 (Spanish)

English → Spanish | Acts Curriculum | Language Package Extension

Format: Smart Brevity

---

Why it matters

The Acts curriculum extends the Romans Language Package into the book that narrates the church’s founding — Pentecost, the Gentile mission, and apostolic authority — in a Spanish-speaking world where every one of those subjects collides with a live, practiced religious tradition, not just a historical debate. Where Romans mainly confronted Catholic sacramental theology in the abstract, Acts confronts it and the fast-growing Pentecostal/Charismatic movement’s own doctrinal claims about the very event (Pentecost) this curriculum’s core passage narrates, and active occult/folk-religious practice (Santería, Espiritismo, curanderismo) that the text directly opposes. Getting this Language Package right determines whether Acts 2 is taught as history or is silently absorbed into a rival tradition’s later doctrine.

Key findings

• 32 doctrines analyzed across all 28 chapters (full-book coverage, no chapter silently skipped): 12 Critical, 14 High, 6 Medium, 0 Low.
• 26 doctrines require mandatory human theologian review; 6 require native speaker review; none are automated-only at the doctrine level.
• 100 terms now populate the enforced translation memory (43 inherited from the Romans baseline + 57 new to Acts): 18 Critical, 31 High, 31 Medium, 20 Low.
• 49 terms (Critical + High) require mandatory human theologian review on every occurrence — nearly half the entire glossary.
• The single highest institutional-collision risk in either curriculum: Acts 20:28’s “obispos” (overseers), which modern Spanish reserves for the monarchical Catholic/Orthodox/Anglican diocesan bishop, applied by the text to the same men called “ancianos” two verses earlier.
• The single highest syncretism-collision risk: Acts’ direct, repeated confrontations with sorcery, magic, and a divinatory spirit (8:9–24; 13:6–11; 16:16–18) in a region where curanderismo, Santería, and Espiritismo are actively practiced, not historical curiosities.
• The core passage itself (Acts 2:1–41) is the most doctrinally dense text in the whole curriculum, containing the Pentecost/tongues cluster, the repentance-baptism-forgiveness-Spirit-gift sequence (2:38), and the Christological climax (“Dios le ha hecho Señor y Mesías,” 2:36) — three separate Critical-tier risk clusters in forty-one verses.

Risks

• Pentecostal/Charismatic doctrinal pressure on the core passage itself: “Pentecostés,” “lleno del Espíritu Santo,” and “hablar en otras lenguas” sit at the intersection of Acts’ own text and a massive, living regional movement’s distinctive theology (subsequence, tongues-as-evidence); mishandling risks either denominational offense or silent doctrinal endorsement.
• Sacramental-cycle collapse of repentance and baptism: Acts 2:38’s decisive, one-time sequence is vulnerable to being read through the dominant culture’s near-universal infant-baptism-plus-repeatable-confession framework, inverting the text’s own pattern.
• “Obispos” institutional projection: without mandatory fencing, Acts 20:28 will be read as establishing the modern diocesan episcopate, a genuine anachronism the text itself contradicts two verses earlier.
• Occult/folk-religious softening: sorcery, divination, and pagan-deity narratives risk being taught as incidental biography rather than the text’s own explicit doctrinal confrontation, given how normalized the competing practices are.
• “Testigo” and “el Camino” recognition-adjacency: not doctrinal collisions but real audience-confusion risks (Jehovah’s Witnesses; New Age “spiritual path” language) that require disambiguating notes, not lexical changes.

Opportunities

• Acts 13:38–39 and the Jerusalem Council (ch. 15) let this curriculum anchor justification-by-faith in concrete narrative history before Romans systematizes it — a strong sequencing opportunity if the two curricula’s terminology stays identical (it does, per the shared translation memory).
• The Gentile-inclusion arc (Acts 10–15) offers a natural, textually-grounded opportunity to address regional racial and social hierarchies in Latin America under the “God shows no partiality” doctrine, without importing an unrelated contemporary political framework.
• Acts’ occult confrontations, handled with the mandated care, are an unusually direct point of pastoral relevance for learners navigating curanderismo/Santería/Espiritismo in their own families and communities.

Recommended actions

1. Load assets/translation_memory.json (100 terms) and assets/bible_term_registry.json alongside assets/doctrine_risk_registry.json before any Phase 2 Acts segment is processed; do not translate from the baseline Romans files alone.
2. Enforce the mandatory “ancianos/obispos” pairing and clarifying note on every occurrence without exception — treat this as a hard validation gate, not a stylistic preference.
3. Route all 49 Critical/High terms and 26 Critical/High doctrines to human theologian review per the escalation rules in analysis/12_ai_translation_requirements.md; do not allow automated-only clearance for any of them.
4. Brief theologian reviewers specifically on the Pentecostal/Charismatic subsequence debate and the occult-confrontation cluster before review begins, since both require judgment calls not resolvable by lexical choice alone.
5. Carry forward identical renderings of Acts 2:36, 2:38, 4:12, 13:39, and 20:28 into every derived lesson document — these five verses are this curriculum’s highest-stakes consistency anchors.

---

This summary must be read alongside analysis/11_doctrine_analysis.md (full doctrine matrix), analysis/08_core_glossary.md (term glossary), analysis/04_comparative_theology.md (comparative sensitivities), and analysis/12_ai_translation_requirements.md (Phase 2 instruction set).