Semantic Analysis: 1 Thessalonians → Korean

Scope and Method

This analysis covers 1 Thessalonians in its entirety, chapters 1–5, in the original Koine Greek (NA28 text-form referenced). The core passage, 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18, receives full verse-by-verse treatment. Every other chapter receives chapter-level treatment of its load-bearing theological vocabulary using the same analytical fields. Terms already fixed in the baseline Romans translation_memory.json are marked [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT] and their recorded Korean rendering is reused without modification, per the hard governing rule of this pipeline. New terms proposed here are candidates for that same translation memory file once ratified.

Curriculum doctrines in view: The Return of Christ, Resurrection of Believers, Sanctification, Hope in Grief, The Day of the Lord.

---

PART 1 — Core Passage: 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18 (Verse-by-Verse)

4:13

Greek: Οὐ θέλομεν δὲ ὑμᾶς ἀγνοεῖν, ἀδελφοί, περὶ τῶν κοιμωμένων, ἵνα μὴ λυπῆσθε καθὼς καὶ οἱ λοιποὶ οἱ μὴ ἔχοντες ἐλπίδα.

Term: κοιμωμένων (koimōmenōn)

• Literal meaning: “those who are sleeping” (present middle/passive participle of κοιμάομαι, “to sleep, fall asleep”)
• Semantic range: literal physical sleep; a widely used euphemism in both Greek and biblical usage for death, especially of believers awaiting resurrection
• English variants: “those who sleep,” “those who have fallen asleep,” “the dead”
• Contextual theological meaning: Paul deliberately uses the sleep-euphemism (not a generic word for “corpse” or “the dead” in a final sense) to frame believers’ death as temporary, non-final, and reversible at the resurrection — the euphemism itself carries doctrinal freight for the doctrine of Resurrection of Believers.
• Destination-language rendering: 자는 자들 (janeun jadeul), lit. “those who sleep.” This matches the existing KRV idiom.
• Risk: High. Korean has its own natural death-euphemism (잠들다, “to fall asleep,” used of the deceased), which aids naturalness, but risk arises if this is read as teaching literal “soul sleep” (an unconscious interim state) as a settled doctrine, or — in a folk-religious frame — assimilated to notions of ancestral spirits resting who might still require ritual attention (제사, jesa). Teaching must clarify: the euphemism concerns the body’s temporary state pending bodily resurrection, not a claim about conscious/unconscious intermediate existence, and it is not a rite-requiring ancestral repose.

Term: λυπῆσθε (lypēsthe)

• Literal meaning: “you might grieve/be sorrowful” (present passive subjunctive of λυπέω)
• Semantic range: sorrow, grief, distress, pain of heart
• English variants: “grieve,” “sorrow,” “be sad”
• Contextual theological meaning: Paul does not forbid grief itself (see 4:13’s purpose clause is “so that you do not grieve as the rest do,” not “so that you do not grieve at all”) — this is the exegetical anchor of the “Hope in Grief” doctrine: grief tempered by hope, not the absence of grief.
• Destination-language rendering: 슬퍼하다 (seulpeohada), “to grieve/be sad.”
• Risk: Medium. The main risk is translational/homiletical, not lexical: a careless rendering could imply Christians must not grieve at all. The comparative clause (καθὼς καὶ οἱ λοιποί, “as the rest do”) must be preserved clearly in Korean syntax so the qualification is not lost.

Term: ἐλπίδα (elpida, from ἐλπίς)

• Literal meaning: “hope”
• Semantic range: confident expectation, forward-looking trust; in secular Greek usage can carry mere probability/uncertainty, but in Paul’s usage denotes a certainty grounded in God’s promise
• English variants: “hope,” “expectation”
• Contextual theological meaning: the defining term of the “Hope in Grief” doctrine; here specifically hope regarding the fate of deceased believers, grounded in the resurrection of Christ.
• Destination-language rendering: 소망 (somang). Not present in the baseline Romans package (Romans does not require a standalone “hope” entry), but this is the standing KRV rendering across the New Testament (cf. Romans 5:2–5, 8:24–25) and must be adopted here as the term for this curriculum.
• Risk: High. 소망 must be kept distinct from generic optimism, and — critically — from Korean folk-fatalistic notions of “hoping” for a favorable outcome from an impersonal fate (운, 팔자) already flagged in the baseline under “calling” and “providence.” Biblical 소망 is certain, because grounded in a historical resurrection and God’s promise, not wishful expectation.

---

4:14

Greek: εἰ γὰρ πιστεύομεν ὅτι Ἰησοῦς ἀπέθανεν καὶ ἀνέστη, οὕτως καὶ ὁ θεὸς τοὺς κοιμηθέντας διὰ τοῦ Ἰησοῦ ἄξει σὺν αὐτῷ.

Term: πιστεύομεν (pisteuomen)

• Literal meaning: “we believe” (present active indicative of πιστεύω)
• Semantic range: to trust, to have faith in, to be persuaded of the truth of
• English variants: “believe,” “have faith,” “are convinced”
• Contextual theological meaning: the content-object of belief is a historical, creedal proposition (“Jesus died and rose”) — faith here is doctrinal assent as the ground for confident hope, tightly linked to the baseline “faith” (믿음) doctrine.
• Destination-language rendering: 믿다 (mitda) / 믿음 (mideum) [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT]
• Risk: High (per baseline). Must remain personal trust anchored in the historical fact of Christ’s death and resurrection, not generic religious sentiment or superstitious belief (미신).

Term: ἀπέθανεν (apethanen) / ἀνέστη (anestē)

• Literal meaning: “died” (aorist of ἀποθνῄσκω) / “rose, stood up again” (aorist of ἀνίστημι)
• Semantic range: ἀνίστημι literally “to stand up again”; used technically in the NT for bodily resurrection from death
• English variants: “died and rose,” “died and was raised”
• Contextual theological meaning: the historical death and bodily resurrection of Jesus is the doctrinal basis (note the εἰ…οὕτως καί, “if…then just so also”) for believers’ own future resurrection — the syllogism structuring the entire Resurrection of Believers doctrine in this passage.
• Destination-language rendering: 죽으시고 (jugeusigo, honorific) / 다시 살아나셨으니 (dasi sarananasyeuni, honorific) or 부활하셨으니 (buhwal-hasyeoss-euni). 부활 (buhwal) is [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT] for “resurrection.”
• Risk: Critical (per baseline resurrection entry). Never render with 환생 (rebirth) or 윤회 (reincarnation cycle). This verse is the doctrinal hinge connecting Christ’s resurrection to believers’ resurrection — mistranslation here undermines the entire core passage.

Term: κοιμηθέντας (koimēthentas)

• Literal meaning: “those who have fallen asleep” (aorist passive participle of κοιμάομαι)
• Semantic range: same euphemism as 4:13, aorist aspect marking a completed event (having died)
• Destination-language rendering: 자는 자들 / 잠자는 자들 (same term-family as 4:13, aorist nuance conveyed by Korean past/perfective marking: 자던 자들 or context-appropriate honorific past construction)
• Risk: High — same considerations as 4:13.

Term: διὰ τοῦ Ἰησοῦ (dia tou Iēsou)

• Literal meaning: “through Jesus”
• Semantic range: instrumental/agency preposition; can also carry an associative sense (“in company with,” debated among grammarians for this verse — some take it with κοιμηθέντας, “those who died in company with Jesus,” rather than with ἄξει)
• Contextual theological meaning: whichever grammatical attachment is followed, the phrase asserts that believers’ resurrection and reunion with Christ is mediated entirely by Jesus, not by any independent human merit or ritual.
• Destination-language rendering: 예수 안에서 / 예수로 말미암아 (yesu-ro mallimama), depending on which grammatical reading is adopted. KRV renders “예수 안에서 자는 자들” (attaching to κοιμηθέντας — “those who sleep in Jesus”).
• Risk: Medium. Flag as a genuine grammatical ambiguity; record the alternative rendering per the Ambiguity Handling protocol; either choice preserves sound doctrine, so risk is procedural (consistency) rather than doctrinal.

Term: ἄξει (axei, from ἄγω)

• Literal meaning: “will bring, will lead”
• Semantic range: to lead, bring, conduct (a person)
• Contextual theological meaning: God is the acting subject who will bring the deceased-in-Christ together with the risen Jesus at the resurrection — reinforcing the personal, relational nature of resurrection hope, not an impersonal cosmic process.
• Destination-language rendering: 데리고 오시리라 (derigo osirira, honorific future).
• Risk: Low.

---

4:15

Greek: Τοῦτο γὰρ ὑμῖν λέγομεν ἐν λόγῳ κυρίου, ὅτι ἡμεῖς οἱ ζῶντες οἱ περιλειπόμενοι εἰς τὴν παρουσίαν τοῦ κυρίου οὐ μὴ φθάσωμεν τοὺς κοιμηθέντας·

Term: λόγῳ κυρίου (logō kyriou)

• Literal meaning: “word of the Lord”
• Semantic range: an authoritative divine communication — either a specific dominical saying or a direct prophetic revelation given to Paul
• Contextual theological meaning: Paul grounds this teaching not in personal speculation but in revealed authority, paralleling the baseline “Inspiration of Scripture” doctrine.
• Destination-language rendering: 주의 말씀 (ju-ui malsseum).
• Risk: Medium. Must not be assimilated to a Confucian classical-text authority model (경, gyeong, transmitted scholarly wisdom) or to a shamanistic oracular utterance; this is direct revealed divine speech.

Term: παρουσίαν (parousian, accusative of παρουσία)

• Literal meaning: “presence, arrival, coming” — in Hellenistic usage, a technical term for the ceremonial visit or arrival of a king or dignitary to a city
• Semantic range: (1) simple presence; (2) an arrival/visit; (3) in NT eschatological usage, the technical term for Christ’s future return in glory
• English variants: “coming,” “arrival,” “advent,” “second coming”
• Contextual theological meaning: this is the central term for the doctrine of “The Return of Christ.” Its royal-visit background reinforces that Christ returns as reigning Lord, not merely “appears.”
• Destination-language rendering: 강림 (gangnim), “descending/coming down [in glory]” — the standing KRV term for Christ’s parousia in this and parallel passages (cf. 2 Thess 2:1, 8). New term for this curriculum (not present in the Romans baseline, which did not require it); this package hereby establishes 강림 as the required rendering for παρουσία referring to Christ’s return throughout 1 Thessalonians.
• Risk: Critical. This is the anchor term of the entire curriculum’s central doctrine. Must never be diluted to a vague “coming” or confused with any notion of periodic/repeatable divine manifestation (cf. baseline caution on 화신, avatar-like repeatable manifestation, under Incarnation). Christ’s parousia is a single, future, bodily, visible, glorious return — not a repeatable spiritual visitation.

Term: φθάσωμεν (phthasōmen, from φθάνω)

• Literal meaning: “we will precede, go before, arrive first”
• Semantic range: to arrive first, to get ahead of, to precede in time
• Contextual theological meaning: living believers at the parousia will have no advantage or “head start” over believers who have already died — direct pastoral comfort for the Thessalonians’ grief that deceased believers might be at a disadvantage.
• Destination-language rendering: 앞서지 못하리니 (apseoji motharini).
• Risk: Low.

---

4:16

Greek: ὅτι αὐτὸς ὁ κύριος ἐν κελεύσματι, ἐν φωνῇ ἀρχαγγέλου καὶ ἐν σάλπιγγι θεοῦ, καταβήσεται ἀπ᾽ οὐρανοῦ, καὶ οἱ νεκροὶ ἐν Χριστῷ ἀναστήσονται πρῶτον,

Term: αὐτὸς ὁ κύριος (autos ho kyrios)

• Literal meaning: “the Lord himself”
• Contextual theological meaning: emphatic — Christ himself, personally, descends; this is not delegated to an intermediary or angelic figure, reinforcing exclusive divine Lordship.
• Destination-language rendering: 주께서 친히 (ju-kkeseo chinhi) [Lord — BASELINE REUSE 주님]
• Risk: Critical (per baseline Lordship of Christ entry). Requires full honorific grammar (주께서, not a plain-register subject marker).

Term: κελεύσματι (keleusmati)

• Literal meaning: “a shout of command” (a military/naval term for a commanding shout, e.g., to rowers)
• Contextual theological meaning: royal/military authority imagery underscoring Christ’s sovereign command at his return.
• Destination-language rendering: 호령 (horyeong) or 명령 소리 (myeongnyeong sori); KRV: “호령과.”
• Risk: Low.

Term: φωνῇ ἀρχαγγέλου (phōnē archangelou)

• Literal meaning: “voice of an archangel”
• Destination-language rendering: 천사장의 소리 (cheonsajang-ui sori).
• Risk: Low-Medium. Ensure 천사장 (“chief/head angel”) is not confused with any folk-spirit hierarchy figure; standard KRV term, low collision.

Term: σάλπιγγι θεοῦ (salpingi theou)

• Literal meaning: “trumpet of God”
• Contextual theological meaning: OT theophany and covenant-assembly imagery (cf. Exodus 19; Joel 2), signaling a decisive, public, unmistakable divine act — not a private or symbolic event.
• Destination-language rendering: 하나님의 나팔 (Hananim-ui napal).
• Risk: Low.

Term: καταβήσεται (katabēsetai)

• Literal meaning: “will descend, come down”
• Contextual theological meaning: a real, spatial, bodily descent from heaven — consistent with the bodily, historical nature of the parousia (not a merely spiritual or metaphorical event).
• Destination-language rendering: 하늘로부터 강림하시리니 (haneul-robuteo gangnim-hasirini), reusing 강림.
• Risk: High (tied to parousia term above).

Term: οἱ νεκροὶ ἐν Χριστῷ (hoi nekroi en Christō)

• Literal meaning: “the dead in Christ”
• Contextual theological meaning: shifts from the sleep-euphemism to the plain term νεκρός (“dead”) — Paul is unafraid to name death directly once the resurrection hope has been established; “in Christ” marks these as believers specifically, not humanity generally.
• Destination-language rendering: 그리스도 안에서 죽은 자들 (Geuriseudo an-eseo jugeun jadeul).
• Risk: Medium. Ensure “in Christ” (그리스도 안에서) is retained as a union-with-Christ marker (cf. baseline “Christian Identity in Christ” doctrine), not reduced to a mere temporal/locative note.

Term: ἀναστήσονται πρῶτον (anastēsontai prōton)

• Literal meaning: “will rise first” (future passive/middle of ἀνίστημι)
• Contextual theological meaning: establishes the sequence central to the doctrine of Resurrection of Believers — the dead in Christ rise before, not after or simultaneously without distinction from, the transformation of the living.
• Destination-language rendering: 먼저 일어나고 (meonjeo ireonago) / 부활하고 (buhwal-hago) [부활 — BASELINE REUSE EXACT]
• Risk: Critical — same forbidden-substitution rules as baseline “resurrection” entry apply (never 환생/윤회); the sequencing word 먼저 (“first”) must be retained precisely, as it is doctrinally load-bearing for the passage’s structure.

---

4:17

Greek: ἔπειτα ἡμεῖς οἱ ζῶντες οἱ περιλειπόμενοι ἅμα σὺν αὐτοῖς ἁρπαγησόμεθα ἐν νεφέλαις εἰς ἀπάντησιν τοῦ κυρίου εἰς ἀέρα· καὶ οὕτως πάντοτε σὺν κυρίῳ ἐσόμεθα.

Term: ἁρπαγησόμεθα (harpagēsometha, from ἁρπάζω)

• Literal meaning: “we will be seized, snatched, caught up” (future passive)
• Semantic range: to seize suddenly and forcibly, to snatch away (often with connotation of removing something from danger or from one realm to another); the Latin Vulgate’s rapiemur is the direct source of the English theological term “rapture”
• English variants: “caught up,” “snatched away,” “raptured”
• Contextual theological meaning: living believers undergo a sudden, God-initiated, bodily transformation and translation at the parousia — an act done to them, not achieved by them; central specific term for the doctrine of the Return of Christ as it intersects with Resurrection of Believers.
• Destination-language rendering: 끌어 올려 (kkeureo ollyeo) / 끌어올림을 받다 (kkeureo ollim-eul batda) — standing KRV rendering (“구름 속으로 끌어 올려”).
• Risk: Critical. This is a doctrinally decisive, frequently debated term across church traditions (timing/sequence relative to “the day of the Lord,” tribulation, etc.). The Korean rendering must preserve the passive voice (an action done BY God TO believers) and must not be rendered with any term suggesting self-effort, ascetic attainment, or a shamanistic ecstatic “spirit-flight” experience (cf. baseline’s caution regarding spirit-possession-adjacent language under Holy Spirit). Flag every occurrence for human theologian review.

Term: νεφέλαις (nephelais)

• Literal meaning: “clouds”
• Contextual theological meaning: OT theophany imagery (cf. Daniel 7:13, Acts 1:9-11) marking divine glory and the reversal of Christ’s cloud-obscured ascension.
• Destination-language rendering: 구름 (gureum).
• Risk: Low.

Term: ἀπάντησιν (apantēsin, from ἀπάντησις)

• Literal meaning: “a meeting”
• Semantic range: in Hellenistic usage, a technical/ceremonial term for a delegation of citizens going OUT from a city to formally receive and escort home an arriving dignitary or king (a parousia-occasion word), then returning with him into the city
• English variants: “to meet,” “meeting,” “welcome”
• Contextual theological meaning: strongly suggests believers go out to meet the returning Christ and then accompany him (the direction of travel implied by the technical usage supports Christ’s continued advance toward the earth, i.e., the meeting is a royal escort, not a departure of believers away from earth permanently) — an important nuance for the “Return of Christ” doctrine that resists otherworldly-escape framings.
• Destination-language rendering: 영접 (yeongjeop), “to welcome/receive [an honored arriving one]” — the standing KRV term.
• Risk: High. Must retain the ceremonial “welcome an arriving sovereign” sense, not flatten to a generic “meet” as in an ordinary encounter; loss of this nuance can inadvertently support an escapist misreading of the rapture as removal from, rather than reunion en route to, the created world Christ is returning to reign over.

Term: εἰς ἀέρα (eis aera)

• Literal meaning: “into the air”
• Destination-language rendering: 공중에서 (gongjung-eseo).
• Risk: Low.

Term: πάντοτε σὺν κυρίῳ ἐσόμεθα (pantote syn kyriō esometha)

• Literal meaning: “we will always be with the Lord”
• Contextual theological meaning: the climactic pastoral promise of the passage — permanent, unbroken fellowship with Christ is the resolution to the Thessalonians’ grief, more central to the passage’s pastoral purpose than the mechanics of the event itself.
• Destination-language rendering: 항상 주와 함께 있으리라 (hangsang ju-wa hamkke isseulira), 주님 [BASELINE REUSE EXACT].
• Risk: Medium. Ensure warmth and permanence are both conveyed; this is the doctrinal and pastoral climax and should not be rendered flatly.

---

4:18

Greek: Ὥστε παρακαλεῖτε ἀλλήλους ἐν τοῖς λόγοις τούτοις.

Term: παρακαλεῖτε (parakaleite, imperative of παρακαλέω)

• Literal meaning: “comfort, encourage, urge, exhort” — one of the broadest-ranging verbs in the NT
• Semantic range: to call to one’s side; hence, depending on context, “to comfort/console,” “to encourage,” “to exhort/urge,” or “to appeal/beseech”
• English variants: “comfort,” “encourage,” “exhort”
• Contextual theological meaning: here specifically the “comfort” sense — this verse is the stated pastoral PURPOSE of the entire resurrection/parousia teaching just given (4:13–17): believers are to use this doctrine to console one another over the death of loved ones, not merely to satisfy curiosity about end-times sequencing.
• Destination-language rendering: 위로하다 (wirohada), “to comfort.” Note: this is a DIFFERENT Korean rendering than the baseline’s existing entry for παρακαλέω under “exhort” (권면하다, gwonmyeonhada), which the baseline itself flags as context-sensitive between entreaty and encouragement. This curriculum package formally registers the “comfort” sense (위로하다) as the required rendering for παρακαλέω specifically in grief-consolation contexts (1 Thess 4:18; cf. also 5:11, “encourage/build up,” 서로 권면하다 or 덕을 세우라 depending on immediate sense).
• Risk: High. Because the same Greek verb receives two distinct established Korean renderings depending on context (위로하다 for comfort; 권면하다 for exhort/encourage-to-action), translators must correctly identify which sense is active per occurrence — an error here would shift 4:18’s tone from pastoral comfort to moral exhortation, altering the doctrine of “Hope in Grief” from consolation to duty.

Term: ἀλλήλους (allēlous)

• Literal meaning: “one another”
• Destination-language rendering: 서로 (seoro).
• Risk: Low.

---

PART 2 — Chapter-by-Chapter Analysis of the Whole Book

Chapter 1

εὐαγγέλιον (euangelion), “gospel” — 1:5. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 복음] Risk: Medium (per baseline).

ἐκκλησία (ekklēsia), “church” — 1:1. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 교회] Risk: Medium (per baseline). Note: 1:1’s greeting “to the church of the Thessalonians in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” (ἐν θεῷ πατρὶ καὶ κυρίῳ Ἰησοῦ Χριστῷ) is a strong union-formula worth flagging for the “Church as God’s People” doctrine.

χάρις καὶ εἰρήνη (charis kai eirēnē), “grace and peace” — 1:1. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 은혜, and see Peace note below]

πίστις, ἀγάπη, ἐλπίς (pistis, agapē, elpis), “faith, love, hope” — 1:3, the triad. 믿음 and (new) 사랑 (sarang, “love,” Low risk, standard term) and 소망 (somang, “hope,” see Core Passage 4:13 entry above — High risk, newly established for this curriculum). This triad recurs as the structural backbone of the whole letter (cf. 5:8) and should be taught as a unit.

ἐκλογή (eklogē), “election” — 1:4 (εἰδότες…τὴν ἐκλογὴν ὑμῶν, “knowing your election”). [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 선택] Risk: High/Medium (per baseline — avoid 팔자/운, fate/luck framings; avoid reducing to competitive-selection sense given Korea’s exam-culture connotations).

πνεῦμα ἅγιον (pneuma hagion), “Holy Spirit” — 1:5, 1:6. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 성령] Risk: Critical (per baseline). Note 1:5’s “gospel came…in power and in the Holy Spirit” directly parallels Romans 1:16’s collocation of δύναμις/πνεῦμα — same shamanistic-power collision risk applies here (see Power of God, below).

δύναμις (dynamis), “power” — 1:5 (οὐκ ἐν λόγῳ μόνον ἀλλὰ καὶ ἐν δυνάμει). [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 능력] Risk: Critical (per baseline Power of God entry). Must be explicitly taught as the Spirit’s power authenticating gospel proclamation, not a mudang-style spirit-power (영력) display sought for its own sake.

εἴδωλα (eidōla), “idols” — 1:9 (ἐπεστρέψατε πρὸς τὸν θεὸν ἀπὸ τῶν εἰδώλων, “you turned to God from idols”). New term. Destination rendering: 우상 (usang). Risk: High. This is a direct, explicit conversion-from-idolatry text. In the Korean context this must be taught with sensitivity to two live phenomena: (1) household ancestral tablets/rites (제사, jesa — already flagged Critical under the baseline “Father” entry) and (2) continuing folk-shamanistic practice (무속신앙) including household or mountain-spirit veneration. The verse’s force (decisive turning away, not syncretistic addition) should be preserved without appearing to caricature or attack living family members who practice jesa; pastoral framing recommended alongside the doctrinal note already established in the baseline package.

θεὸς ζῶν καὶ ἀληθινός (theos zōn kai alēthinos), “living and true God” — 1:9. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 하나님], modified by 살아 계시고 참되신 (sara gyesigo chamdoesin). Risk: Critical (per baseline God entry) — the “living” qualifier is doctrinally pointed directly against the lifeless idols just mentioned, and should retain that rhetorical contrast in Korean.

υἱὸς αὐτοῦ (huios autou), “his Son” — 1:10. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 하나님의 아들] Risk: High (per baseline Sonship of Christ entry).

ὃν ἤγειρεν ἐκ [τῶν] νεκρῶν (hon ēgeiren ek nekrōn), “whom he raised from the dead” — 1:10. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 부활] (ἐγείρω here is a synonym-verb for resurrection, “raised,” alongside ἀνίστημι in 4:14,16; both render to 부활/다시 살리다). Risk: Critical (per baseline).

ὀργή (orgē), “wrath” — 1:10 (τῆς ὀργῆς τῆς ἐρχομένης, “the wrath to come”). New term. Destination rendering: 진노 (jino). Risk: High. Must be taught as the personal, righteous judicial anger of a holy God against sin — the ground-term for the “Day of the Lord” doctrine developed fully in chapter 5 — and must not be softened into an impersonal cosmic retribution (karma-like) or collapsed into 액운 (misfortune/bad luck, already flagged under baseline “sin”). This term recurs at 2:16 and 5:9 and should carry one consistent rendering throughout.

ῥυόμενον (rhyomenon), “who delivers/rescues” — 1:10 (Ἰησοῦν τὸν ῥυόμενον ἡμᾶς, “Jesus who delivers us”). New term, related to but distinct from 구원 (salvation, full soteriological event). Destination rendering: 건지시는 (geonjisineun) or 구원하시는 (guwonhasineun). Risk: Medium — ensure this rescue-from-wrath sense reinforces rather than duplicates the full baseline 구원 entry; may be taught as one facet of salvation’s scope.

---

Chapter 2

ἀπόστολοι (apostoloi), “apostles” — 2:6. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 사도] Risk: Low (per baseline).

ἁγίως καὶ δικαίως καὶ ἀμέμπτως (hagiōs kai dikaiōs kai amemptōs), “holy, righteous, and blameless” — 2:10. 거룩하고 (georokago) [BASELINE — REUSE 거룩한]; δικαίως, “righteously/justly” — an adverb of ethical conduct, related to but distinct in use from the forensic 의 (righteousness) of Romans. Risk: High. Flag explicitly: here δικαίως describes Paul’s observed conduct among the Thessalonians (an ethical, behavioral sense), not the forensic declaration of righteousness by faith central to Romans’ justification doctrine. Using 의 or its adverb form here without a clarifying note risks importing a works-righteousness reading into a verse that is actually describing sanctified apostolic character, not justification.

ἀμέμπτως (amemptōs), “blamelessly” (adverb; cf. ἄμεμπτος, adjective, at 3:13, 5:23) — New term. Destination rendering: 흠 없이 / 흠 없는 (heum eomneun), “without blemish/fault.” Risk: Medium. Recurs three times across the letter (2:10, 3:13, 5:23) as a marker of the Sanctification doctrine’s goal-state; should be rendered consistently.

βασιλείαν καὶ δόξαν (basileian kai doxan), “kingdom and glory” — 2:12. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 하나님의 나라 / 영광] Risk: Low / Medium respectively (per baseline).

λόγος θεοῦ (logos theou), “word of God” — 2:13. New term for this package (related concept to baseline doctrine “Inspiration of Scripture”). Destination rendering: 하나님의 말씀 (Hananim-ui malsseum). Risk: Medium — same collision considerations as λόγος κυρίου at 4:15 (avoid Confucian-classical-text or folk-oracular framing); this verse’s assertion that the word “is at work in you who believe” (ἐνεργεῖται) should be preserved as describing a personal, active divine communication, not an inert sacred text.

σατανᾶς (satanas), “Satan” — 2:18. New term. Destination rendering: 사탄 (satan), a direct transliteration already standard in Korean Christian usage. Risk: Medium. Must be distinguished from Korean folk-belief spirit categories such as 귀신 (gwisin, ghost/malevolent spirit) or 도깨비 (dokkaebi, goblin-trickster figure) — Satan in Romans/NT theology is a singular personal cosmic adversary opposed to God’s redemptive plan, not one spirit among many in a folk pantheon, nor a morally ambiguous trickster figure.

παρουσία (parousia), “coming” — 2:19 (ἔμπροσθεν τοῦ κυρίου ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ ἐν τῇ αὐτοῦ παρουσίᾳ, “before our Lord Jesus at his coming”). [Reuse 강림 established at 4:15 above] Risk: Critical. Note this occurrence links the Return of Christ directly to Paul’s own future joy and “crown of boasting” over the Thessalonian believers — pastoral/relational framing worth preserving alongside the doctrinal content.

---

Chapter 3

στηρίξαι (stērixai), “to establish, strengthen” — 3:2, 3:13. New term. Destination rendering: 굳게 하다 (gutge hada). Risk: Low-Medium. Relevant to perseverance-in-sanctification teaching; ensure it is not read as self-effort alone but as God’s/the missionary’s strengthening work.

πειράζων (peirazōn), “the tempter” — 3:5, referring to Satan. Relates to 사탄 term above. Destination rendering: 시험하는 자 (siheomhaneun ja). Risk: Medium — ensure 시험 here (temptation to sin/apostasy) is not confused with 시험 in its very common secular Korean sense of “test/exam,” given Korea’s intensely exam-oriented culture; context must disambiguate.

ἁγιωσύνῃ (hagiōsynē), “holiness” — 3:13 (ἀμέμπτους ἐν ἁγιωσύνῃ, “blameless in holiness”). New term, noun form distinct from ἁγιασμός (sanctification, the dynamic Spirit-wrought process, treated in ch.4) and from ἅγιος (holy, the baseline adjective). Destination rendering: 거룩함 (georokham), the nominalized state/character of holiness. Risk: Medium-High. Flag the distinction for translators: 거룩함 (state/character, ἁγιωσύνη, here) vs. 성화 (ongoing Spirit-wrought process, ἁγιασμός, baseline term, ch. 4) — both legitimately render “holiness/sanctification” family concepts but at different points on the same doctrinal continuum; consistent disambiguation prevents flattening Paul’s distinct vocabulary choices into a single undifferentiated Korean term.

πάντων τῶν ἁγίων αὐτοῦ (pantōn tōn hagiōn autou), “all his saints/holy ones” — 3:13, at the parousia. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 성도] Risk: High (per baseline). Note a genuine exegetical ambiguity: ἅγιοι here may refer to glorified human believers, to attending angels, or to both — flag for native speaker/theologian review; KRV’s 성도 rendering leans toward the human-believer reading, which should be retained as the primary sense while the ambiguity is footnoted for teaching purposes.

---

Chapter 4 (verses 1–12; vv. 13–18 treated above as core passage)

ἁγιασμός (hagiasmos), “sanctification” — 4:3, 4:4, 4:7 (τοῦτο γάρ ἐστιν θέλημα τοῦ θεοῦ, ὁ ἁγιασμὸς ὑμῶν, “this is God’s will, your sanctification”). [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 성화] Risk: High (per baseline). This is the chapter’s — and one of the curriculum’s five core doctrines’ — central term. Distinguish clearly from 수행/도 닦기 (ascetic self-cultivation).

πορνεία (porneia), “sexual immorality” — 4:3 (ἀπέχεσθαι ὑμᾶς ἀπὸ τῆς πορνείας). New term. Destination rendering: 음행 (eumhaeng). Risk: High. Must be taught as a moral offense against a holy God (directly tied to the ἁγιασμός context, not incidental), not primarily a matter of social shame or loss of face (체면 손상, already flagged under baseline “sin”); Korean honor-shame social dynamics risk reframing this as a reputational rather than fundamentally moral-spiritual matter.

σκεῦος (skeuos), “vessel” — 4:4 (εἰδέναι ἕκαστον ὑμῶν τὸ ἑαυτοῦ σκεῦος κτᾶσθαι). New term; genuinely ambiguous in Greek exegesis. Semantic range: (1) literally “vessel, container, object”; (2) a common Pauline metaphor for one’s own body (cf. 2 Cor 4:7); (3) possibly (per some commentators, followed by some translations) a euphemism for “wife” (i.e., “to acquire/control his own wife” as an idiom for marriage). Destination rendering options: 자기 몸 (jagi mom, “his own body”) vs. 자기 아내 (jagi anae, “his own wife”). KRV renders “자기의 아내 대할 줄을 알고” (adopting the “wife” reading). Risk: High. This is a genuine, consequential translation choice affecting pastoral application (individual bodily self-control vs. marital conduct) — must be flagged for human theologian review per the Ambiguity Handling protocol, with the alternative rendering explicitly recorded.

ἔκδικος (ekdikos), “avenger” — 4:6 (διότι ἔκδικος κύριος περὶ πάντων τούτων, “because the Lord is an avenger concerning all these things”). New term, relates to ὀργή (wrath). Destination rendering: 신원하시는 이 (sinwonhasineun i) or 보응하시는 이 (boeunghasineun i). Risk: Medium. Reinforces that sexual sin has real consequence before a personal, judicial God — ties directly to the Day of the Lord doctrine’s judgment theme.

φιλαδελφία (philadelphia), “brotherly love” — 4:9. New term. Destination rendering: 형제 사랑 (hyeongje sarang). Risk: Low. Positive cultural resonance with Korean church usage of 형제자매 (brothers and sisters) fellowship language; no significant collision risk identified.

ἡσυχάζειν, ἰδίαις χερσὶν ἐργάζεσθαι (hēsychazein, idiais chersin ergazesthai), “to live quietly…to work with your own hands” — 4:11. New terms, low doctrinal risk. Destination rendering: 조용히 살다 (jojonghi salda), 자기 손으로 일하다 (jagi son-euro ilhada). Risk: Low, with a positive cultural-resonance note re: Korea’s strong work-ethic values.

εὐσχημόνως πρὸς τοὺς ἔξω (euschēmonōs pros tous exō), “properly toward outsiders” — 4:12. New term. Destination rendering: 밖에 있는 사람들에 대하여 단정히 (bakke inneun saramdeul-e daehayeo danjeonghi). Risk: Medium. Watch for collapse into Korean 체면 (chemyeon, face/reputation) culture’s concern for external appearances as an end in itself, rather than genuine godly conduct that happens to be outwardly commendable; teach the motive (Christlike integrity) rather than mere appearance management.

---

Chapter 5

ἡμέρα κυρίου (hēmera kyriou), “Day of the Lord” — 5:2. New term, core doctrine. Destination rendering: 주의 날 (ju-ui nal), the standing KRV term (cf. OT prophetic usage, e.g., Joel, Amos, Isaiah). Risk: Critical. This is the anchor term of the “Day of the Lord” doctrine. Must be taught as a decisive, future, personal act of divine judgment and salvation, not conflated with fatalistic notions of an appointed cosmic hour (사주/운명 already flagged under baseline “providence” and “calling”) nor softened to a vague symbolic “day.”

κλέπτης ἐν νυκτί (kleptēs en nykti), “a thief in the night” — 5:2. Metaphor, low independent risk; reinforces suddenness/unpredictability of the Day of the Lord. Destination rendering: 밤에 도둑같이 (bam-e dodukgati). Risk: Low.

ὄλεθρος αἰφνίδιος (olethros aiphnidios), “sudden destruction” — 5:3. New term. Destination rendering: 갑자기 임하는 멸망 (gapjagi imhaneun myeolmang). Risk: Medium — tied to ὀργή/judgment theme; keep personal-judicial framing, not impersonal catastrophe.

υἱοὶ φωτός…υἱοὶ ἡμέρας (huioi phōtos…huioi hēmeras), “sons of light…sons of day” — 5:5, contrasted with νυκτός/σκότους (“of night/darkness”). New term-set. Destination rendering: 빛의 아들들 (bit-ui adeuldeul), 낮의 아들들 (nat-ui adeuldeul). Risk: Medium. Preserve as a moral-spiritual identity contrast (readiness/watchfulness vs. spiritual unpreparedness), not a dualistic cosmological framework that could echo unrelated light/dark philosophical systems; low but non-zero collision risk given East Asian yin-yang-adjacent associations — a brief clarifying note is advisable.

νήφωμεν (nēphōmen), “let us be sober” — 5:6, 5:8. New term. Destination rendering: 근신하다 (geunsinhada) / 깨어 있다 (kkaeeo itda, “be watchful/awake” — paired concept, cf. 5:6 γρηγορῶμεν καὶ νήφωμεν). Risk: Medium. A call to spiritual alertness, not merely abstaining from alcohol (though the literal sense of νήφω, “be sober [from wine],” is the root metaphor) — teach the metaphorical, watchfulness sense as primary in this eschatological context.

θώρακα πίστεως καὶ ἀγάπης, περικεφαλαίαν ἐλπίδα σωτηρίας (thōraka pisteōs kai agapēs, perikephalaian elpida sōtērias), “breastplate of faith and love, helmet of the hope of salvation” — 5:8. Reuses established terms 믿음, 사랑, 소망, and [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 구원]. Risk: Low as an image; High for the individual reused terms per their baseline/above ratings. A strong reinforcing verse for the “Hope in Grief”/assurance doctrine.

περιποίησιν σωτηρίας (peripoiēsin sōtērias), “obtaining/possessing salvation” — 5:9 (οὐκ ἔθετο ἡμᾶς ὁ θεὸς εἰς ὀργὴν ἀλλὰ εἰς περιποίησιν σωτηρίας). New term, reinforcing 구원. Destination rendering: 구원을 얻게 하심 (guwon-eul eutge hasim). Risk: Medium — reinforces the wrath/salvation contrast central to the Day of the Lord doctrine; ensure “obtaining” does not read as human achievement (cf. baseline caution on grace/salvation never being earned).

γρηγορῶμεν εἴτε καθεύδωμεν (grēgorōmen eite katheudōmen), “whether we are awake or asleep” — 5:10. New term, using a DIFFERENT Greek verb (καθεύδω, ordinary/literal sleep or a metaphor for spiritual laxity) than the death-euphemism κοιμάω used in 4:13–15. Destination rendering: 우리가 깨어 있든지 자든지 (uriga kkaeeo ittdeunji jadeunji). Risk: High. Flag explicitly for translators and reviewers: this is NOT the same sense as the “sleep” of 4:13-15 (death); most commentators read 5:10 as “whether we are alive or dead [at the parousia]” using a different sleep-metaphor, though a minority reading takes it as “spiritually watchful or lax.” A translation that uses the identical Korean term as 4:13’s 자는 자 without any distinguishing note risks conflating two distinct Pauline metaphors and confusing the doctrine of assurance this verse is teaching (believers are secure whether alive or dead at Christ’s return).

οἰκοδομεῖτε ἀλλήλους (oikodomeite allēlous), “build up one another” — 5:11. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 서로 덕을 세움] (per baseline doctrine “Mutual Edification”). Risk: Low.

νουθετεῖτε τοὺς ἀτάκτους (noutheteite tous ataktous), “admonish the idle/unruly” — 5:14. New term. Destination rendering: 훈계하다 (hungyehada). Risk: Low-Medium — a mild collision risk with Confucian hierarchical-correction dynamics (cf. baseline caution under “obedience of faith”); teach as loving peer correction within the church body, not top-down hierarchical discipline alone.

χαίρετε πάντοτε, ἀδιαλείπτως προσεύχεσθε, ἐν παντὶ εὐχαριστεῖτε (chairete pantote, adialeiptōs proseuchesthe, en panti eucharisteite), “rejoice always, pray without ceasing, give thanks in all circumstances” — 5:16–18. 감사 [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT]; 기도하다 (gidohada, “pray”) new but standard low-risk term. Risk: Low overall; among the most familiar and beloved verses in Korean church devotional life, minimal collision risk.

τὸ πνεῦμα μὴ σβέννυτε (to pneuma mē sbennyte), “do not quench the Spirit” — 5:19. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 성령]; σβέννυμι (“quench, extinguish”) new term. Destination rendering: 소멸하지 말며 (somyeolhaji malmyeo). Risk: High. Directly intersects the baseline’s Critical “Power of God”/Holy Spirit collision risk: “quenching” language, in a culture where mudang-led ritual is popularly understood to summon, sustain, or dismiss spirit-power, must be carefully taught as restraining or grieving the Spirit’s ordinary sanctifying/gifting work within believers — not as controlling or extinguishing a possessing spiritual force analogous to shamanistic spirit-work.

προφητείας μὴ ἐξουθενεῖτε (prophēteias mē exoutheneite), “do not despise prophecies” — 5:20. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 예언]; ἐξουθενέω (“despise, treat with contempt”) new term. Destination rendering: 멸시하지 말라 (myeolsihaji malla). Risk: Medium (per baseline prophecy entry — distinguish from 점/사주팔자 folk-divination).

πάντα δοκιμάζετε (panta dokimazete), “test everything” — 5:21. New term, low risk. Destination rendering: 범사에 헤아려 (beomsa-e heaeryeo).

αὐτὸς δὲ ὁ θεὸς τῆς εἰρήνης ἁγιάσαι ὑμᾶς ὁλοτελεῖς (autos de ho theos tēs eirēnēs hagiasai hymas holoteleis), “now may the God of peace himself sanctify you wholly” — 5:23. Two terms of note:

• εἰρήνη (eirēnē) here rendered 평강 (pyeonggang), NOT 화평. This is a critical Korean-specific nuance: the baseline package establishes 화평 (hwapyeong) for relational peace-with-God in justification contexts (Romans 5:1) and flags 평안 (pyeongan) as the general-well-being greeting sense to be AVOIDED for the theological concept. Standing KRV usage, however, employs a THIRD, distinct term, 평강 (pyeonggang), specifically in this kind of benedictory/doxological “God of peace” formula. Risk: High. This three-way distinction (화평 / 평강 / 평안) must be explicitly documented for Korean translators working across this curriculum and the Romans baseline together, or inconsistent register will confuse learners moving between the two curricula.
• ἁγιάσαι (hagiasai), “sanctify” (verb, aorist optative of ἁγιάζω) — the verb form of the baseline noun 성화 (sanctification). Destination rendering: 거룩하게 하시고 (georokage hasigo). Risk: High (per baseline sanctification entry) — ensure the verb form is recognized as cognate with 성화 and taught consistently as the same doctrine.

ὁλόκληρον…τὸ πνεῦμα καὶ ἡ ψυχὴ καὶ τὸ σῶμα (holoklēron…to pneuma kai hē psychē kai to sōma), “your whole spirit and soul and body” — 5:23. New term-set (a rare explicit NT trichotomy). Destination rendering: 온 영과 혼과 몸 (on yeong-gwa hon-gwa mom). Risk: High. 혼 (hon, “soul”) in particular carries strong pre-existing associations in Korean folk-shamanistic and ancestor-rite contexts (혼백, honbaek, “soul,” the entity addressed/appeased in ancestor-memorial rites and folk funerary custom; also 넋, neok). Teaching must clarify that biblical 혼/영/몸 describes God’s comprehensive claim on the whole human person for holy living in this life, not a folk-animistic soul that persists as a ritually-tended ancestral spirit. Flag for human theologian review.

πιστὸς ὁ καλῶν ὑμᾶς (pistos ho kalōn hymas), “faithful is he who calls you” — 5:24. [BASELINE — REUSE EXACT: 부르심 / 부르심을 받은] Risk: High (per baseline Divine Calling entry) — reinforces that God’s faithfulness secures the calling already extended, not a fate-calculation (팔자) that could still fail.

φίλημα ἁγίῳ (philēma hagiō), “a holy kiss” — 5:26. New term, low doctrinal risk but a practical/cultural note: physical greeting norms differ significantly in Korean social custom (a cheek/lip kiss greeting is culturally unusual outside close family); most Korean church contexts already substitute a bow, handshake, or verbal greeting for this instruction without doctrinal loss. Destination rendering: 거룩한 입맞춤 (georokan ipmatchum), retaining the literal text with a cultural-application footnote rather than an altered rendering. Risk: Low (doctrinal), Medium (practical/pastoral application note recommended).

---

Summary of Chapters Introducing No Independent New Doctrine-Load

No chapter in 1 Thessalonians is doctrinally inert; all five chapters contribute load-bearing vocabulary to at least one of the five curriculum doctrines. Chapters 1–3 primarily supply background/foundational vocabulary (election, idols, wrath, holiness-as-character, Satan) that chapters 4–5 then build into the curriculum’s core doctrinal payload (Sanctification, Return of Christ, Resurrection of Believers, Hope in Grief, Day of the Lord). All chapter-level terms above should be loaded into translation memory alongside the core-passage terms before Phase 2 processing of any part of this book.