11 — Doctrine Analysis: 1 Timothy (English–Korean)

0. Methodology and Full-Book Coverage Statement

This analysis walks 1 Timothy chapter by chapter, first to last (1:1 through 6:21), identifying every doctrine load-bearing enough to require translation-requirements attention. The core passage, 1 Timothy 3:1-13 (Qualifications for Church Leadership), is the theological anchor of this curriculum but is not the boundary of this analysis’s scope — all six chapters are covered below. Where a passage contributes no new terminology or doctrine risk beyond what is already fixed by the Romans baseline or documented elsewhere in this book, that passage is explicitly noted as “reviewed, no new risk” rather than silently omitted.

Risk tiers (Critical / High / Medium / Low) and review routing (Human theologian / Native speaker / Automated) follow the same framework established in the Romans baseline and are held identical to assets/doctrine_risk_registry.json (1 Timothy extension). No tier assigned here contradicts that registry.

---

1. Full Doctrine Matrix

#	Doctrine	Supporting Passages (1 Timothy)	Risk	Translation Risk Summary	Review Routing
1	Sound Doctrine versus False Teaching	1:3-11; 1:18-20; 4:1-7; 4:16; 6:3-5; 6:20-21	Critical	바른 교훈 vs. 다른 교훈 must contrast consistently at every occurrence; Korea’s documented history of syncretistic new religious movements gives this acute contemporary force, not a purely historical concern.	Human theologian
2	Divine Mercy and Grace toward Sinners	1:2; 1:12-17	Critical	Paul’s autobiographical “foremost of sinners” testimony is Scripture’s own proof-text against the 기복신앙 transactional pattern; 긍휼 (mercy) must never be rendered 자비 (the Buddhist compassion term tied to 관세음보살).	Human theologian
3	Myths and Speculative Genealogies	1:4	High	신화 echoes Korea’s own Dangun founding narrative (also called 신화); 족보 is a genuinely prized living Korean family practice — condemn speculative doctrinal use, not genealogical record-keeping itself.	Human theologian
4	Church Discipline	1:19-20; 5:19-20; 5:24-25	Medium	”Handing over to Satan” must not be read as shamanistic exorcism or spirit-transfer ritual; this is corrective congregational/apostolic action, not ritual mediation.	Native speaker review
5	Public Worship and Prayer	2:1-2; 2:8-10	Medium	Four overlapping prayer-terms (간구/기도/중보기도/감사) must not flatten into one word; 거룩한 손 must retain moral/relational holiness sense, not shamanistic ritual hand-purification.	Native speaker review
6	God’s Universal Saving Will	2:3-4; 4:10	Medium	구주 and 2:3-4’s universal scope must be held together with the baseline’s 선택 (election) doctrine without softening either into merit-based or fatalistic readings.	Native speaker review
7	Christ as the One Mediator	2:5-6	Critical	The single highest new doctrinal risk in this curriculum: collides with the mudang’s ritual-intermediary role, Confucian jesa ancestor-rite mediation, and folk saint/Mary intercession. “One” (εἷς) is load-bearing and exclusive.	Human theologian
8	Christ’s Ransom for All	2:6	High	Directionality is doctrinally essential — Christ gives the ransom to secure salvation; must never read as an upward transactional offering, echoing the baseline grace/기복신앙 directional caution.	Human theologian
9	Women’s Conduct in Public Worship	2:9-15	High	조용함 and 주관하다 intersect with Korea’s Confucian patriarchal norms (cf. baseline “three obediences” note); must not become a blanket cultural endorsement. 해산함 (2:15) must not be conflated with the Critical justification doctrine.	Human theologian
10	Qualifications for Church Leadership — Overseers/Elders	3:1-7; 5:17-22	High	감독 risks Korean Methodist denominational-bishop misreading or collapse into 장로’s Confucian age-seniority sense; Paul uses ἐπίσκοπος/πρεσβύτερος interchangeably for one qualification-examined office.	Human theologian
11	Qualifications for Church Leadership — Deacons	3:8-13	High	집사 has drifted into a customary, often tenure-based honorific title in contemporary Korean church life, distinct from Paul’s tested, character-examined office; 3:11 (“women likewise”) is a genuine translation-decision point requiring theologian handling.	Human theologian
12	The Church as Pillar of Truth	3:14-15	High	The church displays/upholds God-given truth; must not read as generating or privately possessing truth (risk of closed esoteric-society framing). 하나님의 집 must stay distinct from Korea’s ancestor-rite household/lineage concept (가문, 제사).	Human theologian
13	The Mystery of Godliness (Christ-Hymn)	3:16	High	경건의 비밀 is truth once hidden but now openly proclaimed — the opposite of esoteric secret-knowledge patterns in Korean new religious movements; “manifested in the flesh” must not suggest a temporary/repeatable manifestation (cf. baseline’s rejection of 화신).	Human theologian
14	Latter-Day Apostasy and Deceiving Spirits	4:1-5	Critical	미혹하는 영들 and 귀신의 가르침 directly name Korea’s active shamanistic spirit-world (무속신앙); must retain full scriptural warning force as a live contemporary concern, not an abstracted historical one.	Human theologian
15	Godliness as Spiritual Training	4:6-10	High	경건에 이르도록 연단하다 must be distinguished from Buddhist/folk ascetic self-cultivation (수행, 도 닦기, already rejected under baseline sanctification) despite the athletic-metaphor surface similarity; training is grace-dependent, not self-powered.	Human theologian
16	Elder Honor, Age Categories, and Church Order	5:1-2; 5:17-22; 4:14	High	Korea’s Confucian age-hierarchy culture (경로효친) makes it easy to blur 5:1-2’s relational/age sense of πρεσβύτερος with the office sense of ch. 3 and 5:17-19; the qualification-based office must not collapse into generic age-based deference.	Human theologian
17	Care for Widows and the Household of Faith	5:3-16	High	Korean Confucian widow-chastity ideology (열녀 tradition) risks importing an unrelated honor-shame lens onto this passage’s practical material-welfare concern; family-care instruction (5:4) must stay distinct from jesa ancestor-rite obligation.	Human theologian
18	Masters and Servants (Christian Social Ethics)	6:1-2	Medium	Requires a historical-context note distinguishing first-century slavery from modern employment; 상전 (human master) must stay distinct from 주님, reserved exclusively for God/Christ.	Native speaker review
19	Godliness and Contentment	6:3-10	Critical	6:5’s condemnation of “godliness as a means of gain” is Scripture’s own diagnosis of the 기복신앙 transactional pattern (baseline Critical grace/power_of_god entries); 6:6 redefines “gain” as spiritual/eternal. This book’s most direct engagement with the baseline’s central Korean risk doctrine.	Human theologian
20	The Good Confession and Christ’s Return	6:11-16	Critical	만왕의 왕, 만주의 주 extends the baseline’s Critical Lordship-of-Christ doctrine — never “a king among kings”; 선한 증언 must be cross-referenced to, but not conflated with, the baseline’s Romans 10:9 salvation-confession vocabulary.	Human theologian
21	Instructions to the Rich	6:17-19	High	Continues the 6:5-10 기복신앙-adjacent warning; wealthy believers set 소망 on God, not riches — draw an explicit line back to Godliness-and-Contentment and baseline grace/power_of_god entries rather than treating this as isolated financial ethics.	Human theologian
22	Guarding the Deposit of Faith	6:20-21	Critical	παραθήκη is a fixed, received apostolic deposit to be preserved unaltered, not a living tradition open to reinterpretation or blending; acute relevance given Korea’s documented syncretistic new-religious-movement history. 거짓된 지식 guards against counterfeit esoteric-knowledge claims.	Human theologian

---

2. Chapter-by-Chapter Walkthrough (Full Book Coverage)

Chapter 1 — Sound Doctrine, Paul’s Testimony of Mercy, the Charge to Timothy

• 1:1-2 (greeting): Reuses baseline Critical terms 하나님, 그리스도 예수, 주님, 은혜; 아버지 (Critical, baseline) applies directly — Paul’s salutation invokes God as Father in the same doctrinal register the baseline flags for jesa-history awareness. Reviewed; no new risk beyond baseline.
• 1:3-11: Doctrine #1 (Sound Doctrine versus False Teaching) and Doctrine #3 (Myths and Speculative Genealogies) are fully active here — the book’s opening charge. 율법 (law, baseline High) recurs at 1:8-9 and must retain its baseline sense as moral revelation, not Confucian ritual-propriety code.
• 1:12-17: Doctrine #2 (Divine Mercy and Grace toward Sinners) is the chapter’s theological center — Paul’s own testimony. 긍휼 (mercy) is introduced here and must never collapse into 자비. This passage also carries 왕 (King, 1:17 “King of ages”) which anticipates the Critical Doctrine #20 title cluster in chapter 6; flag for consistency but do not merge the two occurrences’ vocabulary prematurely.
• 1:18-20: Doctrine #4 (Church Discipline) is introduced (“handed over to Satan”). 예언 (prophecy, baseline Medium) recurs at 1:18 in its established sense.

Chapter 2 — Public Prayer, the One Mediator, Women’s Conduct

• 2:1-2: Doctrine #5 (Public Worship and Prayer) is active — 중보기도 (baseline Medium) and 감사 (baseline Low) both recur alongside the new 간구/기도 distinction.
• 2:3-4: Doctrine #6 (God’s Universal Saving Will) is active — 구주 (Savior title) is new; must be held with baseline 선택 without softening either doctrine.
• 2:5-6: The chapter’s theological peak — Doctrine #7 (Christ as the One Mediator, Critical) and Doctrine #8 (Christ’s Ransom for All, High) are both active and are the single highest-stakes new-term passage in this curriculum. Mandatory theologian review at every occurrence, per the glossary’s 중보자/대속물 entries.
• 2:7: 사도 (apostle, baseline Low) recurs; reviewed, no new risk.
• 2:8-10: Continues Doctrine #5 (거룩한 손); introduces 정숙함/단정함 (modesty) as adjacent vocabulary to Doctrine #9.
• 2:9-15: Doctrine #9 (Women’s Conduct in Public Worship, High) is fully active — 조용함, 주관하다, and 해산함 all carry the disputed-semantic-range and Confucian-patriarchy collision risks detailed in the matrix above.

Chapter 3 — Qualifications for Church Leadership (Core Passage) and the Church’s Nature

• 3:1-7: Core passage begins. Doctrine #10 (Qualifications — Overseers/Elders, High) is fully active: 감독, “above reproach,” “husband of one wife,” “able to teach,” household management, new-convert restriction, and outsider reputation all carry the 감독/장로 disambiguation risk.
• 3:8-13: Doctrine #11 (Qualifications — Deacons, High) is fully active: 집사, “tested first,” 경건의 비밀 (mystery of the faith, first occurrence — cross-references Doctrine #13), and the disputed 3:11 “women likewise” clause.
• 3:14-15: Doctrine #12 (The Church as Pillar of Truth, High) — 진리의 기둥과 터, 하나님의 집, “church of the living God” (교회, baseline Medium, intensified here).
• 3:16: Doctrine #13 (The Mystery of Godliness / Christ-Hymn, High) — the chapter’s closing doxological summary; 성령 (baseline Critical) and 영광 (baseline Medium) both recur within this hymn and must retain their baseline senses undiluted by the hymn’s compressed poetic form.

Chapter 4 — Latter-Day Apostasy and Godly Training

• 4:1-5: Doctrine #14 (Latter-Day Apostasy and Deceiving Spirits, Critical) — the chapter’s most acute risk, directly naming Korea’s active shamanistic spirit-world. 성령 (baseline Critical) recurs in explicit contrast to 미혹하는 영들; this juxtaposition must be preserved, not smoothed into generic “spirits” language on either side.
• 4:6-10: Doctrine #15 (Godliness as Spiritual Training, High) — 경건 (the book’s most-repeated new term) and 경건에 이르도록 연단하다 are both fully active; 구주 recurs (4:10), reinforcing Doctrine #6.
• 4:11-16: 은사 (spiritual gifts, baseline High) and 장로회 (council of elders, new Medium term) both appear at 4:14, anticipating Doctrine #16 in chapter 5; 안수 (laying on of hands) is introduced here. Doctrine #1 (sound doctrine) recurs at 4:16, closing the chapter on the same note it opened the book.

Chapter 5 — Elders, Widows, and Household Order

• 5:1-2: Doctrine #16 (Elder Honor, Age Categories, and Church Order, High) begins — the critical 연장자/노인 (age sense) vs. 장로 (office sense) disambiguation is introduced here, distinct from but adjacent to Doctrine #10.
• 5:3-16: Doctrine #17 (Care for Widows and the Household of Faith, High) is fully active — 과부, 참 과부, family-care instruction (5:4), and the 열녀-tradition collision risk.
• 5:17-22: Doctrine #16 continues — 배나 존경 (double honor), 장로회, 안수, and Doctrine #4 (Church Discipline) both recur (“do not admit a charge… testify before witnesses”; 5:19-20).
• 5:23-25: Practical/pastoral material (wine for Timothy’s ailment; sins evident vs. hidden) — reviewed; extends Doctrine #4 (5:24-25) but introduces no new term-level risk beyond what is already documented.

Chapter 6 — Servants, Contentment, the Good Confession, and the Final Charge

• 6:1-2: Doctrine #18 (Masters and Servants, Medium) — 종, 상전; the human-master term 상전 must be kept structurally distinct from 주님 per the baseline’s lord entry.
• 6:3-10: Doctrine #19 (Godliness and Contentment, Critical) — the book’s most direct engagement with the baseline’s central Korean risk doctrine (기복신앙). 경건을 이익의 방도로 여김 and 자족하는 마음이 있으면 경건이 큰 이익이 되느니라 must be taught as a paired condemnation/counter-teaching, never separated.
• 6:11-16: Doctrine #20 (The Good Confession and Christ’s Return, Critical) — 선한 증언, 만왕의 왕/만주의 주, and “who alone has immortality” all extend the baseline’s Critical Lordship-of-Christ and God entries with maximal exclusive force.
• 6:17-19: Doctrine #21 (Instructions to the Rich, High) — 소망 (baseline-adjacent new Medium term) is set explicitly against reliance on riches, continuing Doctrine #19’s warning pattern rather than functioning as an isolated financial-ethics unit.
• 6:20-21: Doctrine #22 (Guarding the Deposit of Faith, Critical) — the book’s closing charge; 부탁하신 것을 지키라 and 거짓된 지식 close the epistle by returning to Doctrine #1’s opening concern, forming an inclusio that translation must preserve through consistent, identical vocabulary at both ends of the book.

---

3. Cross-Book Consistency Notes

• Doctrine #1 (Sound Doctrine) and Doctrine #22 (Guarding the Deposit) form a deliberate inclusio (1:3-11 ↔ 6:20-21); Korean renderings of 바른 교훈/다른 교훈 and 부탁하신 것을 지키라 must be verbatim-consistent at both ends per the priority-order rule inherited from the Romans baseline.
• Doctrine #7 (Christ as the One Mediator) and Doctrine #20 (Good Confession / Christ’s Return) both extend the baseline’s Critical Lordship-of-Christ doctrine; they must be taught as reinforcing, not competing, Christological emphases.
• Doctrine #19 (Godliness and Contentment) is the book’s fullest engagement with the baseline’s Critical 기복신앙 caution (documented under baseline grace and power_of_god entries) and should be flagged in Phase 2 tooling with an explicit cross-reference back to those baseline entries.
• Doctrine #10, #11, and #16 together require careful, non-collapsing handling of 감독/장로/집사/연장자 vocabulary; Phase 2 segment processing should treat these four Korean terms as a single disambiguation cluster rather than independent lexical choices.

---

This document extends, and does not contradict, the Romans baseline doctrine_risk_registry.json and is fully consistent with the 1 Timothy extension of that registry (assets/doctrine_risk_registry.json). See 08_core_glossary.md for full term-level detail underlying each doctrine above.

---

Critical Risk Doctrines

Sound Doctrine versus False Teaching

Korean name: 바른 교훈과 거짓 교훈
Key terms: sound doctrine, different doctrine, myths, genealogies, sound_doctrine, false_teaching
Review routing: Human theologian

바른 교훈 (sound doctrine) must contrast textually and consistently with 다른 교훈 (false teaching) at every occurrence across the book. Korea’s documented history of syncretistic new religious movements blending Christian, Buddhist, and shamanistic elements gives this doctrine acute, ongoing relevance rather than a purely first-century concern; 족보 (genealogies) also risks being heard as condemning Korea’s prized living clan-genealogy culture unless carefully qualified.

---

Divine Mercy and Grace toward Sinners

Korean name: 죄인에게 베푸신 하나님의 긍휼과 은혜
Key terms: grace, mercy, sinners, grace, mercy
Review routing: Human theologian

Paul’s self-description as ‘foremost of sinners’ who received grace/mercy without any prior merit is the book’s own autobiographical proof-text against the 기복신앙 (fortune-seeking faith) transactional pattern already flagged Critical in the baseline grace entry. 긍휼 (mercy) must never be rendered 자비, the standard Korean Buddhist compassion term tied to 관세음보살; this is a distinct, doctrinally necessary lexical choice, not a stylistic preference.

---

Christ as the One Mediator

Korean name: 그리스도, 유일하신 중보자
Key terms: one mediator, ransom for all, one_mediator, ransom
Review routing: Human theologian

CRITICAL — the single highest new doctrinal risk in this curriculum. Korean shamanism (무속신앙) is structurally organized around the mudang (무당) as ritual spirit-intermediary; Confucian jesa (제사) ancestor-rites mediate the living-and-dead relationship; folk-Catholic popular piety in some quarters elevates Mary/saints as intercessors. The Greek numeral ‘one’ (εἷς) is load-bearing and must always be taught with full exclusive force, categorically excluding every other mediating figure.

---

Latter-Day Apostasy and Deceiving Spirits

Korean name: 말세의 배교와 미혹하는 영들
Key terms: deceiving spirits, doctrines of demons, forbid marriage, abstain from foods
Review routing: Human theologian

CRITICAL — 미혹하는 영들 and 귀신의 가르침 directly name Korea’s active shamanistic spirit-world (무속신앙), including mudang-channeled 귀신 central to gut ritual and folk exorcism. This warning must retain full scriptural force as a live, contemporary concern for congregations with folk-religious background, not be softened into an abstract or purely historical warning.

---

Godliness and Contentment

Korean name: 경건과 자족
Key terms: godliness as a means of gain, godliness with contentment is great gain, contentment, love of money
Review routing: Human theologian

CRITICAL — 6:5’s explicit condemnation of ‘godliness as a means of gain’ is Scripture’s own direct diagnosis of the transactional 기복신앙 (fortune-seeking faith) pattern already flagged Critical in the baseline’s grace and power_of_god entries; 6:6’s positive counter-teaching redefines ‘gain’ as spiritual and eternal rather than material. This pairing is this book’s most direct, explicit engagement with the baseline’s central Korean risk doctrine and must be taught together, not separately.

---

The Good Confession and Christ’s Return

Korean name: 선한 증언과 그리스도의 재림
Key terms: the good confession, King of kings and Lord of lords, who alone has immortality, appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ
Review routing: Human theologian

만왕의 왕, 만주의 주 directly extends the baseline’s Critical Lordship-of-Christ doctrine and must never be softened to ‘a king among kings’; the good confession (선한 증언) should be cross-referenced to, but not conflated with, the baseline’s Romans 10:9 salvation-confession consistency rule, since the two passages use distinct Korean vocabulary (증언/증거 vs. 시인/고백).

---

Guarding the Deposit of Faith

Korean name: 부탁하신 것(맡은 바 진리)을 지킴
Key terms: guard the deposit, irreverent babble, falsely called knowledge
Review routing: Human theologian

CRITICAL — παραθήκη must be taught as a fixed, received body of apostolic teaching to be preserved unaltered, not a living tradition open to reinterpretation or blending with other religious content. Korea’s documented history of syncretistic new religious movements combining Christian, Buddhist, and shamanistic elements gives this doctrine acute, ongoing contemporary relevance; 거짓된 지식 (falsely called knowledge) further guards against counterfeit esoteric-knowledge claims common to some such movements.

---

High Risk Doctrines

Myths and Speculative Genealogies

Korean name: 신화와 족보 (사변적 교훈 배격)
Key terms: myths, genealogies, speculations
Review routing: Human theologian

신화 (myths) carries an echo-risk with Korea’s own Dangun founding narrative, also popularly called 신화; teach as a negative textual example without implying equivalence to any specific Korean legend. 족보 (genealogies) is a genuinely prized, living Korean family practice rooted in Confucian ancestor-veneration; the verse condemns speculative doctrinal use of genealogical material, not the practice of genealogical record-keeping itself.

---

Christ’s Ransom for All

Korean name: 만인을 위한 대속물
Key terms: ransom, gave himself, antilytron
Review routing: Human theologian

The direction of giving is doctrinally essential: God/Christ gives the ransom to secure salvation; it must never be taught or rendered as a transactional offering presented upward by a worshiper to God or a spirit, echoing the same directional risk already flagged Critical under the baseline grace/기복신앙 entry.

---

Women’s Conduct in Public Worship

Korean name: 예배에서 여성의 태도
Key terms: quietness, exercise authority, modesty, childbearing
Review routing: Human theologian

조용함 (hēsychia) and 주관하다 (authenteō) intersect with Korea’s historic Confucian patriarchal norms (including the now-rejected ‘three obediences’ tradition already flagged in the baseline’s obedience_of_faith entry), risking a blanket cultural-endorsement reading of women’s general public silence rather than the specific, exegetically disputed worship-context instruction Paul gives. 해산함 (2:15) must not be conflated with the Critical justification-by-faith doctrine.

---

Qualifications for Church Leadership — Overseers/Elders

Korean name: 감독(장로)의 자격
Key terms: overseer, above reproach, husband of one wife, able to teach, household management, new convert, good testimony from outsiders
Review routing: Human theologian

감독 risks being read through Korean Methodist denominational-bishop usage (a different scale of office) or collapsed entirely into 장로’s strong Confucian age-seniority connotations (경로효친); teaching must clarify Paul uses ἐπίσκοπος/πρεσβύτερος interchangeably for a single, qualification-examined local-church office, distinct from both hierarchical rank and generic age-based deference.

---

Qualifications for Church Leadership — Deacons

Korean name: 집사의 자격
Key terms: deacon, tested first, mystery of the faith, not greedy for gain, women likewise
Review routing: Human theologian

집사 has drifted in contemporary Korean church practice into a customary, often tenure-based honorific membership title granted after years of attendance/giving, rather than the character-and-service-examined office (δοκιμαζέσθωσαν πρῶτον) Paul describes; teaching must explicitly distinguish the two usages so this doctrine is not read as already satisfied by ordinary title practice. 여자들도 이와 같이 (3:11) is a genuine translation-decision point (wives vs. women deacons) requiring theologian-level handling, not silent resolution.

---

The Church as Pillar of Truth

Korean name: 진리의 기둥과 터인 교회
Key terms: pillar and foundation of truth, household of God, church of the living God
Review routing: Human theologian

The church publicly displays and upholds truth revealed by God; it must not be taught as generating or privately possessing truth, which would risk a guru-like or closed esoteric-society framing more typical of some new religious movements in Korea’s contemporary religious landscape. 하나님의 집 must also be kept distinct from Korea’s ancestor-rite-centered household/lineage concept (가문, 제사).

---

The Mystery of Godliness (Christ-Hymn)

Korean name: 경건의 비밀
Key terms: mystery of godliness, manifested in the flesh, vindicated in the Spirit, believed on in the world, taken up in glory
Review routing: Human theologian

경건의 비밀 must be taught as a truth once hidden but now openly and publicly proclaimed to all — the opposite of the esoteric secret-knowledge pattern found in Korean new religious movements and folk practice. ‘육신으로 나타나신 바 되심’ must never suggest a temporary or repeatable manifestation (cf. baseline’s rejection of 화신 for incarnation).

---

Godliness as Spiritual Training

Korean name: 경건을 위한 훈련
Key terms: train yourself for godliness, bodily training, good minister of Christ Jesus, godliness
Review routing: Human theologian

경건에 이르도록 연단하다 must be distinguished from Korean Buddhist/folk-religious ascetic self-cultivation (수행, 도 닦기, already rejected under the baseline sanctification entry) despite the athletic-training metaphor’s surface similarity; the training in view is grace-dependent discipleship reliant on the living God, not self-powered spiritual achievement.

---

Elder Honor, Age Categories, and Church Order

Korean name: 장로에 대한 존경과 권징
Key terms: elder (age), elder (office), double honor, council of elders, laying on of hands, do not be hasty
Review routing: Human theologian

Korea’s powerful Confucian age-hierarchy culture (경로효친) makes it especially easy to blur 5:1-2’s relational/age sense of πρεσβύτερος with the office sense of 5:17-19 and ch. 3, since 장로 already carries strong social-seniority connotations in ordinary Korean usage; the qualification-based doctrine of church leadership must not be collapsed into generic age-based deference.

---

Care for Widows and the Household of Faith

Korean name: 과부와 성도의 가정 돌봄
Key terms: widow, widow indeed, show godliness at home, worse than an unbeliever
Review routing: Human theologian

Traditional Korean Confucian widow-chastity ideology (열녀, commemorated by 열녀문 memorial gates) risks an unrelated honor-shame framing being imported onto this passage’s practical, relational concern for widows’ material welfare. Positively, 5:4’s family-care instruction aligns naturally with Korean filial piety (효) toward elders, provided it is kept distinct from jesa ancestor-rite obligation directed toward the deceased (baseline Father/Critical entry).

---

Instructions to the Rich

Korean name: 부한 자들에게 주는 권면
Key terms: rich in this present age, uncertainty of riches, hope set on God, rich in good works
Review routing: Human theologian

Directly continues the 6:5-10 기복신앙-adjacent warning pattern: wealthy believers are instructed to set 소망 (hope) on God rather than riches; teaching should draw an explicit line back to the Godliness-and-Contentment doctrine and the baseline’s grace/power_of_god Critical entries rather than treating this as an isolated financial-ethics passage.

---

Medium Risk Doctrines

Church Discipline

Korean name: 교회의 권징
Key terms: deliver to Satan, rebuke, testify before witnesses, elder accusations
Review routing: Native speaker review

The formal disciplinary act of ‘handing over to Satan’ must not be confused with shamanistic exorcism or spirit-transfer ritual performed by a ritual specialist; this is a corrective act of the gathered congregation under apostolic authority, not a ritual mediating act.

---

Public Worship and Prayer

Korean name: 공적 예배와 기도
Key terms: petitions, prayers, intercessions, thanksgivings, holy hands, modesty
Review routing: Native speaker review

The four overlapping prayer-terms (간구/기도/중보기도/감사) must not be flattened into a single generic word; 거룩한 (holy hands) must retain the baseline’s distinction from shamanistic ritual purification rather than a merely ceremonial hand-washing sense.

---

God’s Universal Saving Will

Korean name: 모든 사람이 구원받기를 원하시는 하나님의 뜻
Key terms: God our Savior, all people, desires all to be saved, savior_title
Review routing: Native speaker review

구주 (Savior) and the universal scope of 2:3-4 must be held together with the baseline’s 선택 (election) doctrine without softening either into a merit-based or fatalistic reading; this extends the baseline’s universal_scope_of_gospel doctrine directly.

---

Masters and Servants (Christian Social Ethics)

Korean name: 상전과 종 (성도의 사회윤리)
Key terms: bondservant, master, so that the name of God and the teaching may not be reviled
Review routing: Native speaker review

Requires a clear historical-context note distinguishing the first-century slave institution from modern employment relationships, so the passage is not read as either endorsing slavery or serving as a simple direct analogy to a modern Korean workplace hierarchy; 상전 (human master) must be kept distinct from 주님 (Lord), reserved exclusively for God/Christ per the baseline’s lord entry.