Log in

or use your email

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Requirements bundle

Cross-Reference Analysis

09 Cross-Reference Analysis — Luke (Full Book)

Method and Citation Conventions

  • Citations are normalized in the form Book Chapter:Verse (e.g., Luke 4:18, Isaiah 61:1-2, Genesis 15:6), using standard English book names for internal tracking, matching the style requested for normalization. Myanmar Bible Society book-name equivalents for citation display in destination-language output are given in Part 6, extending the baseline package’s existing table (Romans, Genesis, Psalms, Isaiah, Habakkuk, Joel).
  • Part 1 catalogs every explicit, formally-introduced OT quotation in Luke (“it is written,” “as the prophet said,” etc.).
  • Part 2 catalogs OT allusions and echoes chapter-by-chapter, confirming full-book coverage; chapters whose only OT connection is an explicit quotation already tabulated in Part 1 are cross-referenced rather than re-argued.
  • Part 3 catalogs messianic references and typological patterns (persons, offices, and events in the OT that prefigure Christ or his work in Luke).
  • Part 4 catalogs parallels to the Romans curriculum specifically — shared OT source texts, shared doctrines, and passages where Phase 2 translators of Luke and Romans materials must produce identical or deliberately aligned Burmese renderings.
  • Part 5 states binding rendering-consistency rules for shared quotations, extending (never contradicting) the baseline 12_ai_translation_requirements.md.
  • Part 6 is the citation and book-name appendix.
  • All doctrine names used below (SAV, HS, POOR, REP, PRAY, KGD, DISC, FELL) refer to the eight curriculum doctrines as introduced in 07_semantic_analysis.md/08_core_glossary.md.

PART 1 — Explicit OT Quotations in Luke

#Luke PassageQuoted/Alluded OT TextThemeRelated Character(s)Translation Sensitivity
1Luke 3:4-6Isaiah 40:3-5Forerunner prepares the way; universal salvation (“all flesh”)John the Baptist”All flesh” (Gk pasa sarx) must retain full universality — do not narrow to Israel alone. Aligns with the AI requirements’ universality-preservation rule (Romans 3:23; 10:12-13 analog).
2Luke 4:4Deuteronomy 8:3Reliance on God’s word over material provisionJesus, the devilRender consistently with the established ပညတ်တရား/ကျမ်းစာတော် vocabulary; ties to doctrine PRAY (dependence).
3Luke 4:8Deuteronomy 6:13Exclusive worship of GodJesus, the devilMust preserve exclusivity (“him only”) — do not soften into “especially” or “mainly,” given Burmese religious plurality of devotional objects (Buddha images, nats).
4Luke 4:10-11Psalm 91:11-12Divine protection (misapplied by the devil)the devil, JesusNote this is a misused quotation — the devil quotes Scripture out of context; translation must preserve that Jesus’ reply (v.12) corrects the misuse, not that Psalm 91 itself is false.
5Luke 4:12Deuteronomy 6:16Not testing GodJesus, the devil
6Luke 4:18-19Isaiah 61:1-2 (+ Isaiah 58:6 “set at liberty the oppressed”)Messianic anointing, gospel to the poor, release, kingdom inauguratedJesus (self-identification)CORE PASSAGE. See 07_semantic_analysis.md Part 1 for full verse-by-verse treatment. Every clause maps to a curriculum doctrine (see 10_biblical_theme_map.md Part 4). Must match the Myanmar OT rendering of Isaiah 61:1-2 verbatim, since this is a direct quotation, not a paraphrase.
7Luke 7:27Malachi 3:1John as forerunner-messengerJohn the Baptistကောင်းကင်တမန်/“messenger” root here refers to John, a human messenger, not the baseline’s ကောင်းကင်တမန် (angel) sense used elsewhere in Luke — context must disambiguate: this messenger is human, not angelic.
8Luke 10:27Deuteronomy 6:5 + Leviticus 19:18Love of God and neighbor as the Law’s summarythe lawyer, JesusShared with Romans 13:9 (Leviticus 19:18 quoted there). See Part 4/Part 5 rule 4 — Burmese wording of this Leviticus clause must be identical across both curricula.
9Luke 18:20Exodus 20:12-16 / Deuteronomy 5:16-20The Ten Commandments and their insufficiency to justifyJesus, the rich rulerSets up the doctrine of justification by faith, not law-keeping (baseline: ဖြောင့်မတ်ရာသို့ ရောက်ခြင်း) — the ruler’s subsequent failure (18:22-23) must not be softened into mere ethical advice.
10Luke 19:46Isaiah 56:7 + Jeremiah 7:11Temple’s true purpose: prayer, not commerceJesus, temple merchantsဗိမာန်တော် (Temple, new term) + ဆုတောင်းရာအိမ်တော် (house of prayer, new term) — reinforces doctrine PRAY.
11Luke 20:17Psalm 118:22The rejected stone becomes the cornerstone — Christ’s death and vindicationJesus, the religious leadersShared typological tradition with Romans 9:33/10:11 (Isaiah 28:16 “stone” testimonium). See Part 4/Part 5 rule 7.
12Luke 20:28Deuteronomy 25:5-6Levirate marriage law (cited by opponents to trap Jesus)the SadduceesBackground note on levirate marriage custom recommended, as there is no precise Burmese customary-law analogue.
13Luke 20:37Exodus 3:6God is the God of the living, not the dead — proof of resurrectionJesus, Moses, Abraham/Isaac/JacobDirect scriptural rebuttal of the Sadducees; reinforces baseline resurrection doctrine (never a cyclical-rebirth reading).
14Luke 20:42-43Psalm 110:1Messiah exalted as Lord, seated at God’s right handDavid (as psalmist), JesusCRITICAL — shared Lordship Christology with Romans (cf. Romans 8:34 “at the right hand of God,” though not a direct quotation there). See Part 4/Part 5 rule 1.
15Luke 22:37Isaiah 53:12Suffering Servant “numbered with the transgressors”JesusFlag for theologian review per baseline atonement-escalation rule (parallel to Romans 3:25 propitiation language).
16Luke 23:30Hosea 10:8Judgment lament (“fall on us, cover us”)Jesus (spoken to the daughters of Jerusalem)Prophetic-judgment register; do not flatten into a generic expression of distress.

PART 2 — OT Allusions and Echoes by Chapter (Full-Book Coverage)

Every chapter of Luke is accounted for below. Where a chapter’s primary OT connection is an explicit quotation already tabulated in Part 1, this is noted rather than repeated.

Luke ChapterPassage(s)ThemeRelated Character(s)OT/NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
1Luke 1:13, 1:18Barren-womb-to-birth annunciation patternZechariah, ElizabethGenesis 18:1-15 (Sarah); Judges 13 (Samson’s mother); 1 Samuel 1 (Hannah)Establishes HS/miraculous-birth pattern; avoid folk-miracle framing that would fold this into generic supernatural-birth legend categories.
1Luke 1:32-33Davidic throne foreverGabriel, Jesus2 Samuel 7:12-16 (Davidic covenant); Isaiah 9:6-7Shared with Romans 1:3 (“descended from David”). See Part 4 rule 5.
1Luke 1:37Nothing impossible with GodGabriel, MaryGenesis 18:14
1Luke 1:46-55 (Magnificat)God’s mercy and reversal of the proud/humble, rich/poorMary1 Samuel 2:1-10 (Hannah’s Song); Psalm 113Foundational statement of the Great Reversal meta-theme (see 10_biblical_theme_map.md Part 3); grounds doctrine POOR from the book’s opening page.
1Luke 1:68-79 (Benedictus)Redemption, mercy, covenant remembered, light in darknessZechariahPsalm 132:17; Malachi 4:2, 4:5-6; Isaiah 9:2; Micah 7:20ရွေးနှင်းခြင်း (redemption) root introduced here — must remain consistent through 2:38, 21:28.
2Luke 2:22-24Purification and firstborn dedication lawMary, JosephExodus 13:2,12; Leviticus 12:6-8”Pair of turtledoves” (2:24) signals the family’s poverty under the Levitical provision for the poor (Leviticus 12:8) — reinforces doctrine POOR from Jesus’ infancy.
2Luke 2:29-32 (Nunc Dimittis)Salvation as light for revelation to GentilesSimeonIsaiah 42:6, 49:6, 52:10Shared universal-scope theme with Romans 15:8-12 (also citing Isaiah). See Part 4 rule 9.
2Luke 2:34Sign that will be opposedSimeonIsaiah 8:14 (stone of stumbling)Anticipates the stone-typology of Luke 20:17 / Part 1 #11.
3Luke 3:4-6, 3:8See Part 1 #1; Abrahamic descent insufficient without repentanceJohn the BaptistIsaiah 40:3-5; Genesis (Abraham)Directly parallels Romans 4/9’s teaching that true children of Abraham are marked by faith, not bloodline alone.
3Luke 3:22”You are my beloved Son… well pleased”The Father (voice), JesusPsalm 2:7; Isaiah 42:1Foundational Sonship-of-Christ text (baseline Critical doctrine); recurs at Transfiguration (9:35).
3Luke 3:23-38Genealogy traced to Adam, “son of God”Jesus, AdamGenesis 5; 1 Chronicles 1-3See Part 3 (Adam typology) — major shared ground with Romans 5:12-21.
4Luke 4:4, 4:8, 4:10-12, 4:18-19See Part 1 #2-6Jesus, the devilDeuteronomy 6, 8; Psalm 91; Isaiah 61
4Luke 4:25-27Elijah/widow of Zarephath; Elisha/Naaman — God’s favor reaching Gentiles, provoking local rejectionElijah, Elisha, Jesus1 Kings 17:8-16; 2 Kings 5:1-14See Part 3 (Elijah/Elisha typology); grounds doctrine SAV in the sermon that provokes the Nazareth synagogue’s violent rejection.
5Luke 5:12-14Leprosy-cleansing lawthe leper, JesusLeviticus 14:1-32Levitical ritual-purity background needed for full comprehension of the scene’s significance (Jesus willingly touches/cleanses what the Law quarantines).
5Luke 5:21”Who can forgive sins but God alone?“scribes/Pharisees(theological principle, no single verse)Sets up Son of Man’s divine authority to forgive (5:24) — Critical Deity-of-Christ implication.
6Luke 6:3-4David eating consecrated breadDavid, Jesus1 Samuel 21:1-6Establishes Jesus’ authority to reinterpret Sabbath/ritual law, paired with the standing Sabbath-collision note.
6Luke 6:20-26Beatitudes/Woes — reversal of statusJesusPsalm 1; Isaiah 61:1-3Direct continuation of the Magnificat’s reversal pattern (1:52-53) and the core passage (4:18).
7Luke 7:22Answer to John: blind see, lepers cleansed, poor hear good newsJesus, John’s disciplesIsaiah 35:5-6; 61:1Echoes core passage’s Isaiah 61 language directly — should use identical Burmese vocabulary for “poor,” “blind,” “good news” as established in the core passage rendering.
7Luke 7:27See Part 1 #7John the BaptistMalachi 3:1
7Luke 7:11-17Widow of Nain’s son raisedJesus, the widow1 Kings 17:17-24 (Elijah raises the widow of Zarephath’s son)See Part 3 (Elijah typology); grounds Jesus’ compassion (doctrine FELL) and superiority to the prophetic type.
8Luke 8:10”Seeing they may not see”Jesus (re: parables)Isaiah 6:9-10Related to (but distinct from) the hardening motif of Romans 11:8 (which cites Isaiah 29:10/Deuteronomy 29:4) — note as a thematic parallel, not an identical citation; avoid conflating the two OT sources when cross-referencing.
9Luke 9:30-31, 9:35Moses and Elijah at Transfiguration; “listen to him”Moses, Elijah, Jesus, the FatherExodus 24, 34 (Sinai theophany); Deuteronomy 18:15 (“a prophet like me”); Psalm 2:7; Isaiah 42:1See Part 3 (Moses typology); the divine voice recurs from 3:22 — must render identically.
9Luke 9:54”Command fire to come down” (rebuked)James, John, Jesus2 Kings 1:9-10 (Elijah)Disciples wrongly invoke Elijah’s judgment pattern; Jesus rebukes — models the shift from judgment-prophecy to mercy-ministry, relevant to doctrine FELL.
10Luke 10:27See Part 1 #8the lawyer, JesusDeuteronomy 6:5; Leviticus 19:18
10Luke 10:15Capernaum’s judgment “brought down to Hades”JesusIsaiah 14:13-15 (fall of the king of Babylon)Reinforces baseline Hades/judgment collision note (see glossary #110).
11Luke 11:29-32Sign of Jonah; Queen of the South; SolomonJonah, Solomon, Queen of Sheba, JesusJonah 1-4; 1 Kings 10:1-13See Part 3 (Jonah and Solomon typology).
11Luke 11:51”Blood of Abel” to “blood of Zechariah”Abel, Zechariah (OT prophet, not the Baptist’s father)Genesis 4:8-10; 2 Chronicles 24:20-22Note: this Zechariah is a distinct OT figure from Zechariah the priest of Luke 1 — disambiguate in any teaching note to avoid confusion.
12Luke 12:53Household divisionJesusMicah 7:6Minor but genuine allusion; confirms ch.12 full-book coverage.
13Luke 13:19Mustard seed growing into a treeJesusEzekiel 17:22-23; Daniel 4:10-12Kingdom-growth imagery (doctrine KGD) drawing on OT tree-as-kingdom metaphor.
13Luke 13:29, 13:34-35Many from east/west reclining in the kingdom; lament over Jerusalem, “blessed is he who comes”JesusIsaiah 43:5-6 (gathering from east/west); Psalm 118:26; Jeremiah 12:7; Jeremiah 22:5Psalm 118:26 recurs at the Triumphal Entry (19:38) — render consistently across both occurrences.
14Luke 14:8-10Seating at a banquet: humility before honorJesusProverbs 25:6-7
14Luke 14:15-24Great Banquet — poor, crippled, lame, blind invitedJesusIsaiah 25:6-8; Isaiah 55:1-2Directly fuses doctrines POOR and FELL; the banquet-feast-for-all-peoples motif in Isaiah 25:6 is realized in this parable’s inclusive guest list.
15Luke 15:4-7, 15:8-10Lost sheep, lost coin — God’s seeking loveJesusEzekiel 34:11-16; Psalm 119:176Grounds doctrine REP in God’s initiating, seeking character, not human self-recovery.
15Luke 15:11-32Prodigal Son — covenant restoration, sonship, celebrationthe father, the younger sonechoes Deuteronomy 30:1-10 (return and restoration after exile); Hosea 11:1-4 (God’s compassionate parenting)See doctrine FELL/REP climax; father’s running to meet the son (15:20) echoes σπλαγχνίζομαι compassion pattern (7:13).
16Luke 16:16-17Law and prophets until John; the Law’s abiding validityJesus(thematic — whole OT canon in view)Ties to Fulfillment of Prophecy baseline doctrine.
16Luke 16:19-31Rich man and Lazarus; “Moses and the Prophets”Abraham, Lazarus, the rich man(whole-canon reference to “Moses and the prophets”)See baseline Hades collision note (glossary #110); reinforces that Scripture itself (not a sign from the dead) is sufficient testimony — a strong anti-syncretism statement relevant to Burmese ancestor/spirit-consultation practices.
17Luke 17:26-30, 17:32Days of Noah, days of Lot, Lot’s wifeNoah, Lot, Lot’s wifeGenesis 6-8; Genesis 19Sudden, unanticipated in-breaking of judgment models the KGD “already/not yet” tension at its most urgent.
18Luke 18:20See Part 1 #9Jesus, the rich rulerExodus 20; Deuteronomy 5
18Luke 18:38-39”Jesus, Son of David, have mercy”the blind beggar2 Samuel 7 (Davidic covenant, background)Public messianic confession; see Part 4 rule 5 on Son-of-David vs. seed-of-David distinction.
19Luke 19:38”Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord”the crowdsPsalm 118:26 (recurrence from 13:35); cf. Zechariah 9:9 (background, not directly quoted in Luke)Render identically to the 13:35 occurrence per the consistency principle in Part 5.
19Luke 19:46See Part 1 #10JesusIsaiah 56:7; Jeremiah 7:11
20Luke 20:17, 20:28, 20:37, 20:42-43See Part 1 #11-14Jesus, Sadducees, DavidPsalm 118:22; Deuteronomy 25:5-6; Exodus 3:6; Psalm 110:1
21Luke 21:24-27Jerusalem trampled by Gentiles; Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and gloryJesusDaniel 7:13-14; Zechariah 12:3 (LXX background); Isaiah 13:9-10Apocalyptic imagery drawn from Daniel and the prophetic “Day of the Lord” tradition; the “Son of Man…cloud” language directly parallels 9:26/9:35’s cloud-theophany and must be rendered with the same care against a merely meteorological reading.
22Luke 22:20, 22:37, 22:69New covenant in his blood; suffering Servant; Son of Man at God’s right handJesusJeremiah 31:31-34; Exodus 24:8; Isaiah 53:12; Psalm 110:1; Daniel 7:13-14See Part 1 #15 and Part 4 rules 1, 8.
23Luke 23:30, 23:34, 23:46See Part 1 #16; garments divided; “into your hands I commit my spirit”Jesus, the soldiersHosea 10:8; Psalm 22:18; Psalm 31:5Psalm 22 and Psalm 31 are woven into the crucifixion narrative without formal quotation-introduction, but the verbal correspondence is exact and load-bearing for the doctrine of the atonement — flag for theologian review alongside 22:19-20.
24Luke 24:25-27, 24:44-46”Moses and all the Prophets… the Christ must suffer”Jesus, the Emmaus disciplesWhole-canon reference (Law, Prophets, Psalms); background echoes of Isaiah 53, Psalm 16:10, Hosea 6:2Climactic hermeneutical statement: Jesus reads the entire OT canon as pointing to himself. Foundational for the Fulfillment of Prophecy doctrine and for how this curriculum should frame every OT cross-reference above — they are not incidental echoes but the very pattern Jesus himself names in 24:27.

PART 3 — Messianic References and Typology

Type/FigureOT BasisLuke Fulfillment/EchoRelated NT ConnectionTranslation Sensitivity
Adam (first man, “son of God”)Genesis 1-3, 5Luke 3:38 (genealogy terminates in “son of Adam, son of God”)Romans 5:12-21 (Adam-Christ typology, major Romans doctrine)New required term: Adam = အာဒံ (established Myanmar transliteration). Must be added to translation memory with a note connecting it explicitly to the Romans 5 Adam-Christ typology so both curricula’s teaching materials align.
Abraham (father of the covenant/of faith)Genesis 12, 15, 17, 22Luke 1:55, 1:73, 3:8, 13:16, 16:22-31, 19:9 (Zacchaeus “a son of Abraham”), 20:37Romans 4 (Abraham justified by faith, quoting Genesis 15:6); Galatians 3Luke’s repeated “son/children of Abraham” language must be read consistently with Romans’ teaching that true Abrahamic descent is a matter of faith, not bloodline — avoid implying ethnic Jewish identity alone secures covenant standing.
David (anointed king, royal line)2 Samuel 7:12-16; Psalm 89; Psalm 110Luke 1:32-33, 1:69, 3:31, 18:38-39, 20:41-44Romans 1:3 (“descended from David”); Romans 15:12 (quoting Isaiah 11:10)See Part 4 rule 5 on distinguishing “seed of David” (lineage) from “Son of David” (messianic title).
Moses (mediator, lawgiver, prophet)Exodus 3, 24, 34; Deuteronomy 18:15Luke 9:28-36 (Transfiguration, “listen to him” echoing Deut 18:15); 16:29-31; 24:27, 24:44Acts 3:22, 7:37 (direct Deut 18:15 quotations, outside this pair’s baseline scope but relevant background)Jesus as the greater Prophet like Moses, not a rival lawgiver abolishing the Law — ties to baseline Fulfillment of Prophecy doctrine.
Elijah (prophet of judgment and mercy)1 Kings 17-19; 2 Kings 1-2; Malachi 4:5-6Luke 1:17 (John in “spirit and power of Elijah”); 4:25-26; 7:11-17; 9:8, 9:19, 9:30-35, 9:54(no direct Romans parallel; relevant to HS doctrine’s OT roots)Elijah’s miracle-working must not be assimilated to Burmese folk categories of the wonder-working weizza (esoteric adept) or spirit-medium; these are historical, Spirit-empowered prophetic acts within the covenant narrative, later exceeded by Christ.
Elisha (prophet, healer of the outsider)2 Kings 5:1-14Luke 4:27 (Naaman the Syrian)(relevant to SAV doctrine’s OT roots)Reinforces Gentile-inclusion typology from the very sermon that triggers Nazareth’s rejection (4:28-29).
Jonah (sign of death/vindication; mission to Gentiles)Jonah 1-4Luke 11:29-32(typological background for the resurrection sign, cf. Matthew 12:40’s explicit “three days” application, not stated identically in Luke but implied by the “sign of Jonah” reference)Distinguish the “sign” as pointing to Christ’s own vindication/resurrection, not a moralizing tale about repentance alone.
Solomon (wisdom, glory, Gentile recognition)1 Kings 3, 10Luke 11:31 (Queen of the South); 12:27 (“Solomon in all his glory”)(relevant to SAV’s Gentile-recognition theme — Queen of Sheba as Gentile witness)
Passover Lamb / Exodus deliveranceExodus 12Luke 22:1, 22:7-20 (Last Supper as a Passover meal reinterpreted around Christ’s body and blood)Broader NT atonement theology (cf. 1 Corinthians 5:7, not part of this baseline); parallels Romans 3:25’s propitiation language conceptually, though Romans does not use Passover-lamb imagery directlyRequires an Exodus 12 background note per the AI requirements’ low-OT-literacy audience assumption; flag alongside baseline covenant/atonement escalation rules.
Suffering ServantIsaiah 52:13-53:12Luke 22:37 (Part 1 #15); 24:26-27, 24:46Conceptually parallel to Romans 4:25 (“delivered up for our trespasses”) and Romans 5:19, though Romans does not directly quote Isaiah 53Flag every occurrence for theologian review per the baseline atonement/propitiation escalation rule.
Son of Man (exalted, authoritative figure)Daniel 7:13-14Pervasive in Luke (5:24, 6:5, 9:22-58, 12:8-40, 17:22-30, 18:8, 18:31, 19:10, 21:27-36, 22:22-69, 24:7)Conceptually parallel to Romans’ Lordship-of-Christ doctrine (Romans 10:9, 14:9), though Romans does not use the “Son of Man” titleMust retain the Daniel 7 exalted-authority background per baseline glossary entry #70; never flattened to “a human being.”
The Rejected/Vindicated StonePsalm 118:22; Isaiah 28:16Luke 20:17 (Part 1 #11)Romans 9:33, 10:11 (quoting Isaiah 28:16, “whoever believes in him will not be put to shame”)See Part 4 rule 7 — shared stone-testimonium tradition; render “stone” (ကျောက်) and “reject/stumble” vocabulary consistently across both curricula.

PART 4 — Parallels to the Romans Curriculum

This section identifies passages, OT source texts, and doctrines shared between Luke and the baseline Romans Language Package, where Phase 2 Burmese output must be produced with deliberate cross-curriculum consistency.

#Shared OT Source / DoctrineLuke Passage(s)Romans Passage(s)Consistency Requirement
1Psalm 110:1 — Messiah as exalted LordLuke 20:42-43 (direct quotation)Romans 8:34 (conceptual echo — “at the right hand of God,” not a direct quotation)Both must use the baseline lord term သခင် for the Messianic referent; render Psalm 110:1’s two distinct Hebrew terms (YHWH / Adonai, both rendered κύριος in the LXX quotation) matching the established Myanmar OT text of Psalm 110:1 exactly, since Luke is quoting Scripture verbatim.
2Isaiah 61:1-2 — Spirit-anointed messianic missionLuke 4:18-19 (direct quotation; core passage)Not directly quoted in Romans, but thematically anchors the baseline’s “gospel” (သတင်းကောင်း) and “power_of_god” (ဘုရားသခင်၏တန်ခိုးတော်) entriesAny future Isaiah-based curriculum must match this Luke rendering of Isaiah 61:1-2 verbatim; record as the master Burmese rendering of this OT text for all downstream curricula.
3Genesis 15:6 / the faith-righteousness formulaLuke 7:50 (“your faith has saved you”), Luke 18:14 (tax collector “went down…justified”) — narrative instantiations, not direct quotationsRomans 4:3 (direct quotation of Genesis 15:6); Romans 4:5 (imputed righteousness)Even though Luke narrates rather than quotes, the underlying doctrine is identical. Terminology must match baseline exactly: faith = ယုံကြည်ခြင်း; justification = ဖြောင့်မတ်ရာသို့ ရောက်ခြင်း; imputed righteousness = ဖြောင့်မတ်ခြင်းအဖြစ် မှတ်တော်မူခြင်း. Flag Luke 18:14 for theologian review as a direct narrative cross-reference to the Romans justification doctrine.
4Leviticus 19:18 / Deuteronomy 6:5 — love of God and neighborLuke 10:27 (direct quotation)Romans 13:9 (direct quotation of Leviticus 19:18)Both curricula quote the identical Hebrew/LXX text. The Burmese wording of “love your neighbor as yourself” must be verbatim identical across both curricula’s translated output, not merely conceptually equivalent.
52 Samuel 7:12-16 — Davidic covenant; “seed of David” vs. “Son of David”Luke 1:32-33, 3:31 (lineage); Luke 18:38-39, 20:41-44 (messianic title, vocative use)Romans 1:3 (“seed of David,” lineage); Romans 15:12 (quoting Isaiah 11:10, “root of Jesse”)Two distinct but related Burmese forms already exist and must not be interchanged: ဒါဝိဒ်၏အနွယ်ဝင် (seed of David — physical descent, baseline term, matches Romans 1:3) vs. ဒါဝိဒ်၏သားတော် (Son of David — messianic title, used vocatively in Luke 18:38, 20:41). Apply the form matching the Greek construction in each case.
6Adam-Christ typologyLuke 3:38 (genealogy: Adam as “son of God”)Romans 5:12-21 (Adam-Christ typology; this is a major, explicit Romans doctrine)New term Adam = အာဒံ must be added to translation memory (see Part 3); a translator note should cross-reference Romans 5 so the Luke genealogy’s terminus is not read as a mere ancestral list but recognized as the deliberate typological setup that Romans articulates fully.
7Psalm 118:22 / Isaiah 28:16 — the rejected/vindicated stoneLuke 20:17 (direct quotation of Psalm 118:22)Romans 9:33, 10:11 (direct quotation of Isaiah 28:16)Both draw on the same first-century “stone testimonium” tradition applied to Christ. Use the same Burmese term for “stone” (ကျောက်) and cognate “stumble/reject” vocabulary in both curricula so Burmese readers can perceive the shared typological tradition across Luke and Romans materials.
8Isaiah 53:12 — Suffering Servant / atonementLuke 22:37 (direct quotation)Romans 4:25, 5:19, 8:32 (conceptual echoes of Isaiah 53, not direct quotations); Romans 3:25 (propitiation, the baseline’s key atonement-escalation passage)Flag both for mandatory theologian review per the baseline’s atonement/propitiation escalation rule; ensure the Burmese rendering of Christ “bearing” sin’s penalty is theologically aligned across both curricula even where exact vocabulary differs.
9Universal scope: “all flesh” / “all nations” / “everyone who calls”Luke 3:6 (“all flesh shall see the salvation of God”), Luke 2:32, Luke 24:47 (“all nations”)Romans 10:12-13 (“everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved,” echoing Joel 2:32); Romans 3:29-30; Romans 15:8-12Apply the baseline AI requirements’ Doctrinal Preservation Rule 3 identically: never soften universality language in either curriculum into a graded or ethnically-limited scope.
10Grace vs. meritLuke 1:30 (“found favor”), Luke 2:40, 2:52, 4:22 (“gracious words”), Luke 15 (Prodigal Son’s unearned welcome)Romans 3-4, 11:5-6 (baseline Critical grace doctrine)Every Lukan occurrence of favor/grace vocabulary must reinforce the same contrast with merit-making (ကုသိုလ်ပြုခြင်း) that the baseline mandates for Romans; the Prodigal Son parable is a strong narrative teaching companion to Romans’ propositional grace teaching and should be cross-referenced in curriculum materials.
11Holy Spirit’s empowering, salvation-historical workLuke 1:15, 1:35, 3:22, 4:1, 4:14, 4:18, 24:49 (“clothed with power from on high,” anticipating Pentecost/Acts)Romans 8 (Spirit of adoption, intercession, resurrection life); Romans 1:4 (“Spirit of holiness”); Romans 15:13Consistent holy_spirit (သန့်ရှင်းသောဝိညာဉ်တော်) and power_of_god (ဘုရားသခင်၏တန်ခိုးတော်) rendering across both curricula; Luke 24:49 is the narrative bridge to the fuller pneumatology Romans assumes.
12Resurrection: bodily, historical, once-for-allLuke 20:27-40 (Sadducee debate, quoting Exodus 3:6); Luke 24 (empty tomb, appearances)Romans 1:4, 4:25, 6:4-5, 8:11 (baseline Critical resurrection doctrine)Identical forbidden-substitution rule applies in both curricula: never ပဋိသန္ဓေတည်ခြင်း (rebirth); always ထမြောက်ခြင်း. Luke 20:37-38 functions as a direct proof-text reinforcing the baseline’s anti-cyclical framing.
13Kingdom of God: righteousness, peace, joyLuke 4:43, 17:20-21, 22:16-18Romans 14:17 (“the kingdom of God is…righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit”)Consistent kingdom_of_god rendering (ဘုရားသခင်၏နိုင်ငံတော်); Romans 14:17’s triad (righteousness/peace/joy) can be taught as a compact summary of Luke’s extensive kingdom material.
14Table fellowship across differenceLuke 5:27-32, 14:1-24, 15:1-2, 19:1-10Romans 14:1-15:7, esp. Romans 15:7 (“welcome one another as Christ welcomed you”)Romans 15:7’s welcome-language should be taught as the propositional counterpart to Luke’s extensive narrative demonstrations of Jesus welcoming sinners and outsiders to the table.

PART 5 — Rendering-Consistency Rules for Shared Quotations

Binding for Phase 2 translation of both this Luke curriculum and any future revision of the Romans curriculum:

  1. Psalm 110:1 (Luke 20:42-43). Render using the exact wording already established in the Myanmar Old Testament for this verse. The Messianic referent “my Lord” must use သခင် per the baseline lord entry, consistently with how Romans’ Lordship-of-Christ material (Romans 8:34, 10:9) has been taught.
  2. Isaiah 61:1-2 (Luke 4:18-19). This core-passage quotation must match the established Myanmar OT rendering of Isaiah 61:1-2 exactly, since it is a direct citation, not a paraphrase. Record this as the master Burmese rendering for any future Isaiah-curriculum cross-reference.
  3. Genesis 15:6 / faith-righteousness formula (Luke 7:50, 18:14 || Romans 4:3-5). Even where Luke narrates rather than quotes, use the baseline terms exactly: ယုံကြည်ခြင်း (faith), ဖြောင့်မတ်ရာသို့ ရောက်ခြင်း (justification), ဖြောင့်မတ်ခြင်းအဖြစ် မှတ်တော်မူခြင်း (imputed righteousness). Flag Luke 18:14 for theologian review as a narrative parallel to Romans’ propositional justification doctrine.
  4. Leviticus 19:18 (Luke 10:27 || Romans 13:9). The Burmese quotation of “love your neighbor as yourself” must be verbatim identical in both curricula’s output — not merely equivalent in meaning.
  5. Seed of David vs. Son of David (2 Samuel 7 background || Romans 1:3, 15:12 || Luke 1:32-33, 18:38-39, 20:41). Use ဒါဝိဒ်၏အနွယ်ဝင် only for lineage/descent statements (matching Romans 1:3’s grammatical construction); use ဒါဝိဒ်၏သားတော် only for the vocative messianic title. Do not interchange the two forms.
  6. Adam (Luke 3:38 || Romans 5:12-21). Add Adam = အာဒံ to translation memory as a new entry, flagged High risk, doctrine “Adam-Christ Typology,” with a standing translator note pointing to Romans 5 so both curricula’s materials remain doctrinally cross-referenced.
  7. The rejected stone (Psalm 118:22 / Isaiah 28:16 || Luke 20:17 || Romans 9:33, 10:11). Use ကျောက် consistently for “stone” and a consistent stumble/reject verb pairing across both curricula to preserve the shared typological tradition.
  8. Isaiah 53:12 (Luke 22:37) and the broader Suffering-Servant background of the Passion narrative (Luke 22-23). Flag every occurrence for mandatory theologian review, consistent with the baseline’s atonement/propitiation escalation rule (originally keyed to Romans 3:25).
  9. Universal-scope language (“all flesh,” “all nations,” “everyone who calls”) (Luke 3:6, 24:47 || Romans 10:12-13, echoing Joel 2:32). Apply the AI requirements’ Doctrinal Preservation Rule 3 identically in both curricula — never soften or narrow universal-scope statements.
  10. Holy Spirit empowerment formula (“clothed with power,” Luke 24:49) and its Romans 8 pneumatological counterpart. Maintain the baseline holy_spirit and power_of_god terms exactly; teach Luke 24:49 as the narrative anticipation of the fuller pneumatology Romans assumes as already accomplished.

PART 6 — Citation and Book-Name Conventions (Appendix)

Extends the baseline 12_ai_translation_requirements.md book-name table with additional Old Testament books cited in this analysis. All citations in published Myanmar materials must use these Myanmar Bible Society conventions; internal tracking documents may continue to use normalized English forms (e.g., “Genesis 15:6”).

English Book NameMyanmar Bible Society Name
Lukeလုကာခရစ်ဝင်
Genesisကမ္ဘာဦးကျမ်း
Exodusထွက်မြောက်ရာကျမ်း
Leviticusဝတ်ပြုရာကျမ်း
Deuteronomyတရားဟောရာကျမ်း
1 Samuel၁ ဓမ္မရာဇဝင်ကျမ်း
2 Samuel၂ ဓမ္မရာဇဝင်ကျမ်း
1 Kings၃ ဓမ္မရာဇဝင်ကျမ်း
2 Kings၄ ဓမ္မရာဇဝင်ကျမ်း
Psalmsဆာလံကျမ်း
Proverbsသုတ္တံကျမ်း
Isaiahဟေရှာယကျမ်း
Jeremiahယေရမိကျမ်း
Ezekielယေဇကျေလကျမ်း
Danielဒံယေလကျမ်း
Hoseaဟောရှေကျမ်း
Joelယောလကျမ်း
Micahမိကာကျမ်း
Habakkukဟဗက္ကုတ်ကျမ်း
Zechariahဇခရိကျမ်း
Malachiမလခိကျမ်း
Romansရောမ

Verse-number convention: Arabic numerals in the working segment cache; Myanmar numerals in published print editions — per baseline convention, unchanged.


Summary of Full-Book Coverage

All 24 chapters of Luke have at least one documented OT quotation, allusion, or typological connection in Parts 1-3 above. No chapter was found to be without OT/theological cross-reference content; chapters with lighter connections (e.g., ch. 12) are explicitly noted rather than silently omitted. This coverage, together with 07_semantic_analysis.md and 08_core_glossary.md, feeds directly into 10_biblical_theme_map.md.

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words