Log in

or use your email

Search the Library

Keyword search across Doctrine Analysis, Core Glossary, Comparative Theology, and Regional Analysis. Mention a language name for the best results — e.g. "remnant burmese" or "what glossary terms conflict for burmese."

Type at least 2 characters to search.

Welcome to the Library

What is this?

The Library publishes the doctrine-aware translation research behind tri-bible.ai, one language and book at a time — free to read and reuse.

How to navigate

Pick a language, then a book, in the sidebar. Each book has a Doctrine Analysis, a Core Glossary, and, for the language as a whole, a Comparative Theology and Regional Analysis. Use the search icon in the top nav to jump straight to a term or doctrine instead of browsing.

What the risk tiers mean

Every doctrine and glossary term is labeled with how easily it could be misread or mistranslated in that language's own cultural and religious context:

Critical
A wrong word choice here risks distorting core theology — always reviewed by a theologian before use.
High
A real, well-documented risk of confusion with another tradition or belief system — needs theologian review.
Medium
Worth a native speaker's second look, but not likely to distort the core meaning.
Low
Minor wording nuance — low risk of confusion either way.

Work with us

Tell us a bit about how you'd like to work with tri-bible.ai.

Stay informed Get our weekly newsletter. Never sold or shared, unsubscribe anytime.

Let us serve you Church leaders and ministry networks seeking translated curriculum Join our team Volunteers interested in reviewing translations
Download Translation Skill

Semantic Analysis

Titus — Phase 1 Semantic Analysis (Hmong Language Package)

0. Scope, Method, and Governing Conventions

This document analyzes the entire book of Titus (chapters 1–3) in Koine Greek, chapter by chapter, with the assigned core passage Titus 2:11–3:8 receiving full verse-by-verse treatment. It extends — and never contradicts — the Romans Hmong Language Package baseline (translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, doctrine_risk_registry.json, 12_ai_translation_requirements.md).

Reuse rule. Any term already fixed in the Romans baseline TM is reused exactly (identical Hmong string) here. These are marked [BASELINE TM] at first use. New terms surfaced by Titus are marked [NEW — Titus] and carry a provisional risk tier pending formal TM-revision review, per the baseline’s governing note (§10) that new terms must be logged, not silently made permanent.

Register. Formal, reverent, literary Hmong (RPA script), consistent with §5 of the baseline requirements document. Second person remains plain koj/nej; formality is carried by vocabulary and classifier choice.

Risk tiers follow the baseline definitions exactly:

  • Critical — doctrinally load-bearing term with a strong, specific collision with Hmong traditional religion that could invert or neutralize the doctrine.
  • High — real potential for confusion with a specific traditional-religious concept/practice or with another biblical term, manageable with a documented disambiguating strategy.
  • Medium — partial semantic mismatch, register gap, or comprehension gap, no direct collision.
  • Low — stable, safe rendering with minimal ambiguity.

A note on Titus’s distinctive risk profile. Titus is short (3 chapters, 46 verses) but doctrinally dense, and it introduces several term-classes absent or minor in Romans: (a) a fixed noun-title “Savior” (σωτήρ) applied identically to God the Father and to Christ (six times), sharpening the deity-of-Christ question already flagged in the Romans baseline for 9:5; (b) formal church-office qualification vocabulary (elder/overseer) that intersects sharply with Hmong clan-elder (txwj laus) social and ritual authority; (c) a regeneration/new-birth term (παλιγγενεσία) that risks conflation with Hmong beliefs about the soul’s reincarnation; (d) an explicit condemnation of “genealogies” as a divisive distraction — a direct collision with the central place of clan genealogy (keeb kwm xeem) in Hmong identity and ancestor ritual; and (e) the letter’s single most repeated ethical term, σώφρων (“self-controlled/sensible”), which has no single-word Hmong equivalent and must be rendered consistently across six occurrences.


PART A — Core Passage Verse-by-Verse: Titus 2:11–3:8

Titus 2:11

Ἐπεφάνη γὰρ ἡ χάρις τοῦ Θεοῦ ἡ σωτήριος πᾶσιν ἀνθρώποις

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
Ἐπεφάνηepephanē”has appeared / has been manifested” (aorist passive of ἐπιφαίνω)to shine forth, become visible, appear openly; used of the visible epiphany of a deity/ruler in Hellenistic usage”has appeared,” “has dawned,” “was manifested”Marks the Incarnation as a historical, once-for-all in-breaking of God’s saving purpose into visible history — the first of a deliberate two-part “appearing” structure completed at 2:13 and echoed again at 3:4.[NEW — Titus] tshwm los (“has appeared/come into view”). Risk: Medium. No traditional-religion collision, but must be kept terminologically identical at 2:13 and 3:4 so hearers perceive the deliberate first-appearing/second-appearing structure; losing the repetition flattens a key literary-theological device.
χάρις τοῦ Θεοῦcharis tou Theou”the grace of God”God’s unmerited favor as an active, personified force”grace,” “favor”Grace itself is the subject of the sentence and the grammatical subject of the participle in v.12 (“training us”) — grace is not merely a status believers receive but an active teacher/trainer.[BASELINE TM] txiaj ntsim ntawm Vajtswv. Risk: Critical (inherited). Must never be rendered koob hmoov.
σωτήριοςsōtērios”saving, bringing salvation” (adjective)that which effects or brings σωτηρία (salvation)“saving,” “that brings salvation”Qualifies grace as itself the saving reality, not merely the announcement of it — grace = salvation-bringing, already active.[NEW — Titus] rendered periphrastically as uas coj txoj kev cawm dim los (“that brings salvation”), anchored to the baseline [BASELINE TM] kev cawm dim. Risk: High. Must retain the mandatory Christ-anchoring convention from the baseline’s salvation_save entry even though no explicit “through Christ” clause occurs until v.13-14; the immediate co-text supplies the anchor.
πᾶσιν ἀνθρώποιςpasin anthrōpois”to all men/people”universal scope, all humanity without ethnic/status restriction”to all people,” “for everyone”Universalizes the offer of grace-that-saves against any reading that would restrict it to a covenant elite — important given Titus’s Cretan/Gentile mission context.rau tag nrho tibneeg — descriptive, stable. Risk: Low.

Synthesis: Verse 11 opens the theological core of the letter: grace is not static but an event that has appeared in history and is itself saving and universal in scope. This grounds the entire “Grace That Trains for Godly Living” doctrine — training (v.12) is grace’s own activity, not a human addition to grace.


Titus 2:12

παιδεύουσα ἡμᾶς ἵνα ἀρνησάμενοι τὴν ἀσέβειαν καὶ τὰς κοσμικὰς ἐπιθυμίας σωφρόνως καὶ δικαίως καὶ εὐσεβῶς ζήσωμεν ἐν τῷ νῦν αἰῶνι

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
παιδεύουσαpaideuousa”training, disciplining, instructing” (present participle of παιδεύω)child-rearing discipline/education; can include correction/chastisement (cf. Heb 12:6) as well as positive instruction”training,” “instructing,” “disciplining”Core verb of the doctrine “Grace That Trains for Godly Living.” Grace personified as a teacher/parent actively forming character — training flows from grace already given, not toward earning it.[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL] cob qhia (“train/instruct,” the natural Hmong verb for disciplined training of children or animals toward a skill). Risk: Medium-High. Doctrinal precision risk (not a traditional-religion collision): must be taught explicitly that grace is the trainer and training is grace’s fruit, never that disciplined living produces or earns grace — this guards the boundary with Doctrine 3 (Salvation by Grace not Works).
ἀρνησάμενοιarnēsamenoi”having denied/renounced”to disown, repudiate, refuse allegiance to”denying,” “renouncing,” “having rejected”A decisive, past-oriented renunciation that grounds the ongoing present-tense godly life.tso tseg / lees tias tsis coj lawm (“having renounced/set aside”). Risk: Low.
ἀσέβειανasebeian”ungodliness, irreverence toward God”the negative counterpart of εὐσέβεια; lack of proper reverence/worship of God”ungodliness,” “impiety”Direct antonym to εὐσέβεια (v.12b, “godly”); frames godliness as the trained goal and ungodliness as the renounced past.[NEW — Titus] kev tsis hwm Vajtswv, built directly on the [BASELINE TM] ungodly entry (tus tsis hwm Vajtswv, Romans 4:5). Risk: Medium (inherits the baseline’s register but is a noun-abstraction rather than a person-description; low collision risk since it reuses an already-vetted root).
κοσμικὰς ἐπιθυμίαςkosmikas epithymias”worldly desires/lusts”desires oriented to the present age/world-system rather than God”worldly passions,” “worldly desires”Names the object renounced — not desire itself but desire’s wrong orientation (“of this age,” anticipating v.12d).[NEW — Titus] kev ntshaw ntawm lub ntiajteb — ἐπιθυμία (“desire/lust”) is new; κοσμικός reuses [BASELINE TM] world (lub ntiajteb). Risk: Low-Medium.
σωφρόνωςsōphronōs”sensibly, with self-mastery” (adverb)soundness of mind expressed in disciplined, self-governed conduct”self-controlled,” “sensibly,” “soberly”First of the letter’s signature ethical triad (self-controlled / righteous / godly); σώφρων-family recurs six times in Titus (1:8; 2:2,4,5,6,12) and is the letter’s dominant repeated virtue term.[NEW — Titus, recurring headline term] kev tswj tus kheej (“self-governance/self-control”). Risk: Medium. No single Hmong word covers σώφρων; the phrase must be used identically at every occurrence (1:8; 2:2,4,5,6,12) to preserve the letter’s deliberate repetition.
δικαίωςdikaiōs”justly, righteously” (adverb)conduct consistent with δικαιοσύνη”righteously,” “justly”Second member of the triad; reuses the righteousness word-family central to Romans.[BASELINE TM] adverbial form of Vajtswv txoj kev ncaj ncees / tus ncaj nceesncaj ncees (adverbially, “in a righteous manner”). Risk: Critical (inherited from Romans #25); must not be heard as self-achieved moralism divorced from the forensic sense established in Romans, even though here it describes lived conduct flowing from grace, not a ground of justification.
εὐσεβῶςeusebōs”godly, with reverence toward God” (adverb)living out proper reverence/piety toward God in daily conduct”godly,” “devoutly”Third member of the triad; the letter’s positive keynote virtue (εὐσέβεια/εὐσεβῶς frame the whole book, cf. 1:1).[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL] hwm Vajtswv (“revere/honor God”), adverbially “hwm Vajtswv.” Risk: High. Hwm is the same verb used for honoring ancestors and household/nature spirits (hwm dab, hwm poj koob yawm txwv); the object must always be stated (hwm Vajtswv, never bare hwm) — directly parallel to the baseline’s worship_serve_cultic (pehawm) qualifier-enforcement pattern.
ἐν τῷ νῦν αἰῶνιen tō nyn aiōni”in the present age”the current era of history, contrasted with the age to come”in this present age,” “in the world today”Sets the ethical triad within a two-age framework — godly living now, in anticipation of the “blessed hope” of v.13.[NEW — Titus] tam sim no, hauv lub sijhawm uas peb tseem nyob hauv ntiajteb no (“now, in the present age”). Risk: Low.

Synthesis: Verse 12 is the operational center of “Grace That Trains for Godly Living”: grace’s training produces a threefold ethic (self-controlled, righteous, godly) lived out now, in expectation of what is announced in v.13. The three virtue-adverbs must be rendered with terminological stability, since σώφρων recurs as the letter’s structural keyword.


Titus 2:13

προσδεχόμενοι τὴν μακαρίαν ἐλπίδα καὶ ἐπιφάνειαν τῆς δόξης τοῦ μεγάλου Θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
προσδεχόμενοιprosdechomenoi”awaiting, looking forward to”to receive to oneself in expectation; eager, confident waiting”awaiting,” “looking for,” “expecting”Present participle expressing continuous posture of confident expectation — parallels and grounds the baseline hope entry’s insistence that hope is not idle wishing but grounded expectation.[NEW — Titus] tos npaj siab rau (“waiting with settled expectation for”). Risk: Low-Medium.
μακαρίαν ἐλπίδαmakarian elpida”the blessed hope”ἐλπίς = confident expectation grounded in promise; μακάριος = blessed, fortunate, to be congratulated”blessed hope,” “happy hope”The object of expectation is itself called “blessed” — the hope of Christ’s return is a source of present blessedness, not merely a future event.[BASELINE TM] kev cia siab (hope) + [NEW] uas tau koob hmoov is FORBIDDEN as a qualifier for “blessed” here since koob hmoov is permanently reserved away from grace/salvic contexts; instead render “blessed” as zoo siab kawg nkaus (“supremely joyful/fortunate” in a non-hmoov sense). Risk: High — flag explicitly to prevent translators reaching for koob hmoov as a natural-sounding gloss for “blessed” in this exact verse.
ἐπιφάνειανepiphaneian”appearing, manifestation” (noun)the visible in-breaking/arrival of a person of high honor (used technically in Hellenistic ruler-cult of a king’s ceremonial arrival)“appearing,” “coming,” “manifestation”The second “appearing” of the 2:11/2:13/3:4 triad — here the future, glorious appearing (Second Coming), contrasted with grace’s past appearing (2:11) and reprised in kindness’s past appearing (3:4).[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL for eschatology] qhov yuav tshwm los rau sawvdaws pom (“the appearing that will be seen by all”), built on the same root as tshwm los (2:11). Risk: Medium. Must be kept distinguishable from the past-tense tshwm los of 2:11/3:4 by tense/aspect marking (yuav tshwm los = future) so the doctrine’s two-appearings structure survives translation.
δόξηςdoxēs”glory”splendor, honor-weight, visible manifest presence”glory”Christ’s future appearing is a glory-appearing — visible, unmistakable divine splendor.[BASELINE TM] lub yeeb koob. Risk: Low (inherited).
τοῦ μεγάλου Θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦtou megalou Theou kai sōtēros hēmōn Iēsou Christou”of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ”grammatically, a single article (τοῦ) governs both “great God” and “Savior,” both predicated of one referent, Jesus Christ (a Greek grammatical pattern — Sharp’s rule — indicating a single person is described by both titles)“our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,” or (weaker, avoided) “our great God, and [our separate] Savior, Jesus Christ”Direct affirmation of the full deity of Christ — Jesus Christ is here named “God” as well as “Savior,” structurally identical to the deity-of-Christ affirmation the Romans baseline documents for Romans 9:5. This is the single highest-stakes Christological clause in Titus.[BASELINE TM structure] Yexus Khetos, peb tus Vajtswv thiab tus Cawmseej uas muaj hwjchim loj — reusing Vajtswv (God), Yexus Khetos (Jesus Christ), and introducing [NEW — Titus, CRITICAL] tus Cawmseej (Savior, fixed title — see v.13/1:3/1:4/2:10/3:4/3:6 entries). Risk: Critical. Any rendering that inserts a grammatical break implying two distinct referents (“our great God, and our Savior Jesus Christ” as two persons) must be flagged [TRANSLATOR REVIEW NEEDED: possible Christological ambiguity] and corrected to preserve single-referent structure, per the baseline’s forbidden-substitution pattern for diminished-Sonship renderings (Romans 12 §3.1).

Synthesis: Verse 13 supplies the object of the “blessed hope”: the glorious, future, visible appearing of Jesus Christ, explicitly titled both “great God” and “our Savior” in a single grammatical unit — a Critical-tier Christological affirmation requiring the same theologian-review escalation the baseline mandates for Romans 9:5.


Titus 2:14

ὃς ἔδωκεν ἑαυτὸν ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν, ἵνα λυτρώσηται ἡμᾶς ἀπὸ πάσης ἀνομίας καὶ καθαρίσῃ ἑαυτῷ λαὸν περιούσιον, ζηλωτὴν καλῶν ἔργων

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
ἔδωκεν ἑαυτὸν ὑπὲρ ἡμῶνedōken heauton hyper hēmōn”gave himself for/on behalf of us”self-substitution, self-sacrifice for another’s benefit”gave himself for us,” “sacrificed himself on our behalf”Substitutionary, self-giving atonement language — Christ as both agent and offering.muab nws tus kheej rau peb (“gave himself for us”). Risk: Low-Medium; should be taught alongside, but kept distinct from, the baseline propitiation_atoning_sacrifice entry (qhov theej txhoj kev txhaum, Romans 3:25) since Titus does not use the Romans propitiation-noun but expresses the same substitutionary act verbally.
λυτρώσηταιlytrōsētai”might redeem/ransom”to release by paying a price, buy back from bondage/slavery”redeem,” “ransom,” “set free”Redemption from lawlessness — echoes the baseline’s redemption (ἀπολύτρωσις) entry, applying the debt/slave-ransom metaphor to moral bondage.[BASELINE TM] kev txhiv. Risk: Medium (inherited); must remain anchored to Christ as price-payer per the baseline note.
ἀνομίαςanomias”lawlessness”living without regard to law, moral disorder”lawlessness,” “wickedness”The condition from which believers are redeemed — an existential state of being unbound by God’s moral order.[NEW — Titus] kev tsis coj raws li Txoj Kevcai, built on [BASELINE TM] law_mosaic_divine (Txoj Kevcai). Risk: Medium. Must retain the qualifier-awareness of the baseline Law entry even though here “lawlessness” is moral disorder generally rather than specifically Mosaic transgression, to avoid implying Gentile Cretan believers are being held to Mosaic ceremonial law.
καθαρίσῃkatharisē”might cleanse/purify”to make ritually or morally clean”cleanse,” “purify”Christ’s redemptive act is also purifying — creating a clean people set apart for himself.[NEW — Titus] ntxuav kom dawb huv, sharing the dawb huv root with the [BASELINE TM] sanctification entry. Risk: Medium (inherits the sanctification entry’s folk ritual-purity collision awareness — dawb huv also denotes ritual purity from spirit-contamination in folk practice).
λαὸν περιούσιονlaon periousion”a people for [his own] possession”a treasured, specially-owned people (echoes LXX Exodus 19:5, Israel as God’s סְגֻלָּה/περιούσιος people)“a people for his own possession,” “his very own people,” “a peculiar people”Applies Israel’s covenant-election language directly to the (largely Gentile) church — a deliberate covenant-continuity claim.[NEW — Titus, HIGH] ib haiv neeg uas Vajtswv xaiv ua nws tug tshwj xeeb (“a people God has chosen to be specially his own”), explicitly co-textualized with the [BASELINE TM] election_choose volitional clause (Vajtswv xaiv raws li nws lub siab nyiam). Risk: High. Two risks converge: (1) the baseline’s election/hmoov-fatalism collision applies identically here and the volitional-choice clause must not be dropped; (2) haiv neeg (“people/ethnic group”) risks a narrow clan/ethnic reading in Hmong social context, understating that this “people” is a transnational, covenant-spiritual identity, not an ethnic lineage — a distinct risk from the hmoov collision and requiring its own teaching note.
ζηλωτὴν καλῶν ἔργωνzēlōtēn kalōn ergōn”zealous for good works”eager, enthusiastic devotion to doing good”zealous for good works,” “eager to do what is good”Introduces the letter’s good-works refrain as the purpose and fruit of redemption, never its ground — critical boundary-marker for Doctrine 3.[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL] ζēλωτήςkev siab tawv nquam ua; ἔργων[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL, recurring] tej haujlwm zoo (“good works/deeds”). Risk: Critical. Must always be taught as the consequence of redemption (v.14) and never its cause — this is the pivot term shared with 3:5’s explicit exclusion of “works of righteousness” as a basis of salvation; the two occurrences must be distinguished in teaching (works-as-fruit here vs. works-as-excluded-ground in 3:5) without using two different Hmong words, since Paul deliberately uses the same word (ἔργα) in both senses.

Synthesis: Verse 14 completes the grace-appearing unit (2:11-14) with Christ’s redemptive purpose: to create a purified, specially-owned covenant people zealous for good works. This verse is the doctrinal seedbed for both “Salvation by Grace not Works” (via the works-as-fruit/not-ground distinction) and “Grace That Trains for Godly Living” (training’s visible fruit).


Titus 2:15

Ταῦτα λάλει καὶ παρακάλει καὶ ἔλεγχε μετὰ πάσης ἐπιταγῆς. μηδείς σου περιφρονείτω

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
λάλειlalei”speak”ordinary verb for speaking, here of authoritative proclamation”speak,” “teach,” “declare”Titus is charged to proclaim the preceding theological content (2:11-14) as authoritative teaching, not mere opinion.qhia / hais — stable. Risk: Low.
παρακάλειparakalei”exhort, urge, encourage”to call alongside, urge strongly, comfort/encourage depending on context”exhort,” “encourage,” “urge”Pastoral exhortation register — distinct from mere information-transfer.ntuas / txhawb siab — stable. Risk: Low.
ἔλεγχεelegche”rebuke, reprove, correct”to expose error and correct it, often with implied shame on the wrongdoer”rebuke,” “reprove,” “correct”Authoritative correction of deviation from sound teaching — same verb used of confronting false teachers in 1:9,13.cem / qhuab ntuas — reused consistently with 1:9,13. Risk: Low-Medium.
ἐπιταγῆςepitagēs”command, authority, order”formal, authoritative directive”authority,” “full authority,” “command”Same noun as 1:3 (“command of God our Savior”) — Titus’s pastoral authority is derivative of, and parallel to, God’s own commanding authority in the gospel.[NEW — Titus] lus samhwm, used consistently at 1:3 and 2:15. Risk: Low-Medium.
περιφρονείτωperiphroneitō”let [no one] disregard/despise”to think around/beyond, treat with contempt, look down on”disregard,” “despise,” “look down on”Anticipates potential undermining of Titus’s youth or status; his authority derives from the message, not his personal standing.[NEW — Titus] saib tsis taus (“look down on/regard as worthless”). Risk: Low.

Synthesis: A pastoral-authority transition verse bridging the theological unit (2:11-14) to the ethical-social unit (3:1-2); low collision risk, mainly comprehension/register.


Titus 3:1

Ὑπόμίμνησκε αὐτοὺς ἀρχαῖς καὶ ἐξουσίαις ὑποτάσσεσθαι, πειθαρχεῖν, πρὸς πᾶν ἔργον ἀγαθὸν ἑτοίμους εἶναι

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
Ὑπόμίμνησκεhypomimnēske”remind”to bring back to mind, cause to remember”remind,” “keep reminding”Ongoing pastoral reinforcement of already-known ethical instruction — civic submission is not new teaching but a repeated reminder.lem/ceev tso rau lawv nco ntsoov (“remind them”). Risk: Low.
ἀρχαῖς καὶ ἐξουσίαιςarchais kai exousiais”rulers and authorities”ἀρχή = office/rank of rule; ἐξουσία = delegated right/power to act, already flagged in the Romans baseline”rulers and authorities,” “governments and officials”Names both the persons (rulers) and the delegated power (authorities) that Christians are to submit to — direct parallel to Romans 13:1’s governing-authority teaching.ἀρχαῖς: [NEW — Titus] cov nom tswv (“rulers/officials”); ἐξουσίαις: [BASELINE TM] cov muaj hwjchim kav teb chaws. Risk: High (inherited collision awareness from Romans #67 — hwjchim must never be heard as unmarked shamanic power; here doubly reinforced since Titus explicitly commands submission to this authority, raising the stakes of the qualifier).
ὑποτάσσεσθαιhypotassesthai”to submit, be subject to”to arrange under, place oneself in a subordinate, ordered relationship”submit,” “be subject to,” “be under the authority of”Core verb of the “Submission to Authority” doctrine, applied here to civil government, and elsewhere in Titus to wives (2:5) and slaves (2:9) — a single verb spanning three distinct social-authority relationships.[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL, recurring: 2:5, 2:9, 3:1] txo hwjchim nyob rau hauv (“lower one’s authority/status to be under”). Risk: High. Must be rendered identically at all three occurrences to preserve Paul’s structural parallel (wife/husband, slave/master, citizen/ruler as three applications of one submission principle), while teaching notes must distinguish appropriate qualified submission from unrestricted patriarchal or civil authoritarianism, given Hmong clan culture’s strong existing hierarchical submission norms — risk is over-application/reinforcement of existing patriarchal structures beyond Paul’s qualified intent, not under-application.
πειθαρχεῖνpeitharchein”to obey [those in] authority”compound of πείθω (persuade/obey) + ἀρχή (rule) — obedience specifically to rulers”obey,” “be obedient to authorities”Reinforces ὑποτάσσεσθαι with a near-synonym specific to ruler-obedience — a doubled emphasis on civic compliance.[NEW — Titus] mloog cov nom tswv lus (“obey the rulers”). Risk: Medium.
ἔργον ἀγαθὸνergon agathon”good work/deed”a beneficial, morally good act”good work,” “good deed”First of several “good works” references framing civic obedience itself as a species of good works.[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL, recurring] haujlwm zoo (singular form of the recurring tej haujlwm zoo term — see 2:14 above). Risk: Critical (same cross-cutting risk as 2:14/3:5/3:8/3:14).

Synthesis: Opens the ethics-of-submission unit; introduces the recurring Critical-risk ὑποτάσσω verb that spans three distinct household/civic relationships in Titus and must be rendered with strict lexical consistency.


Titus 3:2

μηδένα βλασφημεῖν, ἀμάχους εἶναι, ἐπιεικεῖς, πᾶσαν ἐνδεικνυμένους πραΰτητα πρὸς πάντας ἀνθρώπους

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
βλασφημεῖνblasphēmein”to slander, speak evil of”to revile, defame; can refer to slander of persons or blasphemy against God depending on object”slander,” “speak evil of,” “revile”Applied here to slandering people generally (not God) — a horizontal-ethics application of a term the baseline (2:5, implicitly) also applies to reviling God’s word.[NEW — Titus] hais lus phem rau luag (“speak evil of others”). Risk: Low-Medium; must be distinguished contextually from the God-directed sense at 2:5 (ua rau Vajtswv Txoj Lus raug thuam).
ἀμάχουςamachous”not quarrelsome, peaceable”free from contentiousness, avoiding fights/disputes”peaceable,” “not contentious”Positive social virtue counterbalancing the letter’s warnings against factious quarreling (cf. 3:9).[NEW — Titus] tsis nyiam sib cav (“not fond of quarreling”). Risk: Low.
ἐπιεικεῖςepieikeis”gentle, considerate, reasonable”yielding, forbearing, reasonable in dealing with others”gentle,” “considerate,” “reasonable”Social gentleness as a mark of Spirit-trained character.[NEW — Titus] siab mos siab muag (“soft/tender-hearted”). Risk: Low.
πραΰτηταprautēta”gentleness, meekness”strength held in restraint; the opposite of harshness, not weakness”gentleness,” “meekness”Near-synonym reinforcing ἐπιεικεῖς — the ethical tone Christians owe “all people,” recalling the pre-conversion contrast of v.3.[NEW — Titus] kev txo hwjchim thiab siab mos siab muag. Risk: Low.

Synthesis: A brief virtue-list continuing the civic-ethics unit; low collision risk, primarily register/comprehension.


Titus 3:3

Ἦμεν γάρ ποτε καὶ ἡμεῖς ἀνόητοι, ἀπειθεῖς, πλανώμενοι, δουλεύοντες ἐπιθυμίαις καὶ ἡδοναῖς ποικίλαις, ἐν κακίᾳ καὶ φθόνῳ διάγοντες, στυγητοί, μισοῦντες ἀλλήλους

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
ἀνόητοιanoētoi”foolish, without understanding”lacking spiritual/moral discernment”foolish,” “senseless”Recalls the Romans baseline merism vocabulary (cov ruam, “the unwise/foolish”).[BASELINE TM — reuse] cov ruam (from Romans merism_greeks_barbarians_wise_unwise). Risk: Low (inherited).
ἀπειθεῖςapeitheis”disobedient”refusing to be persuaded/obedient, especially toward God”disobedient,” “rebellious”Names the pre-conversion state as one of active disobedience, contrasted with the obedience now urged (3:1).[NEW — Titus] tsis mloog lus. Risk: Medium — deliberately echoes and contrasts with the submission/obedience vocabulary of 3:1, a rhetorical before/after structure that must survive translation.
πλανώμενοιplanōmenoi”being led astray, deceived”wandering off the true path, deceived”led astray,” “deceived,” “going astray”Passive — deception as something done to the pre-conversion self, not merely self-chosen error.[NEW — Titus] raug dag mus deceiveraug ntxias kom yuam kev. Risk: Low-Medium.
δουλεύοντεςdouleuontes”serving as slaves, being enslaved”bondage-service, here metaphorical enslavement to desires”enslaved to,” “serving,” “slaves to”Draws on the same δουλ- root as doulos (baseline servant_slave_doulos) — but here negatively, enslavement to sin/desire rather than honored bondservice to Christ; the contrast between these two “slaveries” is a key rhetorical move of the letter.[NEW — Titus] ua qhev rau, deliberately reusing the [BASELINE TM] qhev root. Risk: Medium. Must be taught alongside the baseline’s servant_slave_doulos note distinguishing willing, honored bondservice to Christ (1:1) from this degrading, involuntary enslavement to sin/desire (3:3) — same lexical root, opposite moral valence.
ἐπιθυμίαις καὶ ἡδοναῖς ποικίλαιςepithymiais kai hēdonais poikilais”various desires and pleasures”ἐπιθυμία = strong desire/lust; ἡδονή = pleasure, sensory gratification”various passions and pleasures”Names the objects of the former slavery — desire and pleasure-seeking without restraint.ἐπιθυμίαις reuses 2:12’s rendering (kev ntshaw); ἡδοναῖς: [NEW — Titus] kev lomzem ntawm kev txhaum (“sinful pleasure/enjoyment”). Risk: Low-Medium.
κακίᾳ καὶ φθόνῳkakia kai phthonō”malice and envy”κακία = general moral badness/malice; φθόνος = envy, resentment of others’ good”malice and envy”Names the inner-relational vices of the former life.[NEW — Titus] kev phem thiab kev khib. Risk: Low.
στυγητοίstygētoi”hateful, detestable”worthy of hatred, odious”hateful,” “detestable”Describes the former state’s relational character — actively repugnant, not merely flawed.[NEW — Titus] tsim txom rau luag saib (“detestable/repulsive to others”). Risk: Low.
μισοῦντες ἀλλήλουςmisountes allēlous”hating one another”mutual, reciprocal hatred”hating one another”Closes the vice-list with relational breakdown — the opposite of the church unity Titus is to cultivate.sib ntxub (“hating each other”). Risk: Low.

Synthesis: Verse 3 supplies the “before” half of a before/after conversion narrative that continues directly into v.4-7 — a rhetorical structure (not itself doctrinally contested) that must be preserved so the force of “but when…” (v.4) lands with full contrast.


Titus 3:4

ὅτε δὲ ἡ χρηστότης καὶ ἡ φιλανθρωπία ἐπεφάνη τοῦ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Θεοῦ

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
χρηστότηςchrēstotēs”kindness, goodness”benevolent kindness in action”kindness,” “goodness”Names the divine attribute that “appeared” — echoing and specifying the more general “grace” of 2:11.[NEW — Titus] txoj kev zoo siab tos txais (“kindness/gracious welcoming disposition”). Risk: Low.
φιλανθρωπίαphilanthrōpia”love for mankind”benevolent love directed at humanity as such”love for mankind,” “philanthropy”Pairs with χρηστότης to describe the character of God’s saving initiative — love reaching toward humanity broadly, echoing 2:11’s “to all men.”[NEW — Titus] kev hlub tibneeg, built on the [BASELINE TM] kev hlub (love) root. Risk: Low.
ἐπεφάνηepephanē”appeared”(identical form to 2:11)“appeared”Third and final occurrence of the appearing-triad (2:11 grace appeared / 2:13 glory will appear / 3:4 kindness appeared) — deliberately reprises 2:11’s exact verb form, closing the theological frame around the whole unit.[NEW — Titus, same as 2:11] tshwm los. Risk: Medium (inherited from 2:11) — must be rendered identically to 2:11 (past tense) and distinctly from 2:13 (future tense) to preserve the triad.
τοῦ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Θεοῦtou sōtēros hēmōn Theou”of God our Savior""God our Savior”Applies the fixed “Savior” title to God the Father here (as distinct from 2:13’s application to Christ) — the same title used of both Persons across the letter, reinforcing rather than diminishing their united saving purpose.[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL, recurring] Vajtswv, peb tus Cawmseej. Risk: Critical — same escalation class as 2:13; the title tus Cawmseej must be used identically whether the referent is the Father (1:3; 2:10; 3:4) or the Son (1:4; 2:13; 3:6), preserving Paul’s deliberate title-sharing between Father and Son without collapsing the Persons or diminishing either.

Synthesis: Opens the “but God” contrast (vv.4-7) — the pivot of the entire salvation-by-grace argument, and the third and final “appearing,” completing the theological triad begun in 2:11.


Titus 3:5

οὐκ ἐξ ἔργων τῶν ἐν δικαιοσύνῃ ἃ ἐποιήσαμεν ἡμεῖς, ἀλλὰ κατὰ τὸ αὐτοῦ ἔλεος ἔσωσεν ἡμᾶς διὰ λουτροῦ παλιγγενεσίας καὶ ἀνακαινώσεως Πνεύματος Ἁγίου

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
οὐκ ἐξ ἔργων τῶν ἐν δικαιοσύνῃ ἃ ἐποιήσαμεν ἡμεῖςouk ex ergōn tōn en dikaiosynē ha epoiēsamen hēmeis”not by works [done] in righteousness which we ourselves did”explicit exclusion of human moral achievement as the basis/means of salvation”not because of righteous things we had done,” “not by works of righteousness we have done”The single most explicit statement in Titus of the “Salvation by Grace not Works” doctrine — deliberately excludes ANY human righteous deed, however sincere, as the ground of salvation, directly parallel to the Romans baseline’s justify_reckon_as_righteous forbidden-substitution note (never “ua zoo,” do-good, framing).ἔργων here: [NEW — Titus, CRITICAL] tej haujlwm ncaj ncees uas peb tau ua — same lexeme (tej haujlwm) as 2:14/3:1/3:8/3:14’s “good works,” but here explicitly excluded as salvation’s ground. Risk: Critical. MANDATORY teaching note distinguishing this occurrence (works as excluded ground) from the letter’s other four occurrences (works as commanded fruit) using identical vocabulary — translators/curriculum must never resolve the tension by using two different Hmong words, since Paul’s rhetorical point depends on the single shared word. δικαιοσύνῃ reuses [BASELINE TM] kev ncaj ncees.
ἔλεοςeleos”mercy”compassion toward one in a miserable/needy condition, as distinct from grace’s unmerited favor toward the guilty”mercy,” “compassion”Mercy — not merit, not works — is named as the true basis of salvation, echoing the Romans baseline’s careful mercy/grace distinction (Romans 9, 11).[BASELINE TM] txoj kev khuv leej. Risk: Medium (inherited); must remain lexically distinct from txiaj ntsim (grace) per the baseline note, even though both appear together in this salvation-unit (mercy here in v.5, grace in v.7).
ἔσωσενesōsen”saved” (aorist)completed, definite act of rescue”saved,” “he saved”A completed, historical act of salvation — the mercy of God acting decisively, not a process still underway.[BASELINE TM] cawm, anchored to Yexus Khetos per the baseline’s mandatory convention (co-text: v.6 “through Jesus Christ our Savior” supplies the anchor). Risk: High (inherited).
λουτροῦloutrou”washing, bath”ritual or literal washing; here figurative/sacramental of the washing associated with new birth”washing,” “bath”Baptismal-adjacent imagery describing the means through which regeneration is associated, though the text’s emphasis falls on the Spirit’s work, not the water’s ritual efficacy.[NEW — Titus, HIGH] kev ntxuav, deliberately linked to but distinguished from the [BASELINE TM] baptism entry (kev cai raus dej). Risk: High. Inherits the baptism entry’s kevcai-root collision with folk ritual purification from spirit-contamination; must be taught, exactly as the Romans baseline requires for baptism, as pointing to a once-for-all spiritual reality accomplished by the Spirit, never a repeatable cleansing rite.
παλιγγενεσίαςpalingenesias”regeneration, new birth, being born again”a decisive, one-time re-origination of life; in wider Hellenistic usage could denote cosmic renewal or (in Stoic thought) cyclical world-recreation — Paul narrows it here to individual spiritual new birth”regeneration,” “new birth,” “being born again”Core term of the doctrine “Regeneration by the Holy Spirit.” Names the Spirit’s decisive, one-time act of granting new spiritual life, the true basis (with mercy) of salvation instead of works.[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL] kev raug yug dua tshiab (“being caused to be born again/anew”). Risk: Critical. Direct, specific collision: Hmong traditional cosmology includes belief in multiple human souls, one of which may be understood to be reborn/reincarnated in a descendant; “yug dua” (born again) risks being heard as referring to soul reincarnation rather than a one-time, Spirit-wrought, non-cyclical spiritual new birth. MANDATORY contrast-teaching required: this is a single, unrepeatable, Spirit-given new birth of the whole person’s relationship to God, not a repeatable transmigration of a soul-portion into a new body. This is the highest-priority NEW collision surfaced in the Titus analysis and should be escalated for human theologian + native-speaker review before any TM-revision finalizes the rendering.
ἀνακαινώσεως Πνεύματος Ἁγίουanakainōseōs Pneumatos Hagiou”renewal of/by the Holy Spirit”ongoing renewal, effected by (or belonging to) the Holy Spirit”renewal by the Holy Spirit,” “renewing of the Holy Spirit”Pairs regeneration’s one-time new birth with the Spirit’s ongoing renewing work — a Titus-specific pairing not identical to Romans 12:2’s “renewal of the mind” (νοῦς), though built on the same ἀνακαίνωσις root.[BASELINE TM — modified reuse] kev hloov siab tshiab, extended here as kev hloov siab tshiab los ntawm Vaj Ntsuj Plig (“renewal of heart/mind coming from the Holy Spirit”), preserving the mandatory [BASELINE TM] Vaj Ntsuj Plig prefix. Risk: Medium for the renewal concept (comprehension-level distinction from Romans 12:2’s mind-renewal), but Critical for the Vaj Ntsuj Plig prefix enforcement, inherited directly from the baseline’s Sanctification doctrine risk (never drop “Vaj” or the divine Sanctifier collapses into an animistic human soul-reference).

Synthesis: Verse 5 is the doctrinal hinge of the entire core passage: it explicitly excludes works as salvation’s ground (Doctrine 4) and names mercy, washing, regeneration, and Spirit-renewal as salvation’s true basis (Doctrine 5) — the single most theologically dense verse in Titus and a mandatory Critical-tier escalation point.


Titus 3:6

οὗ ἐξέχεεν ἐφ᾽ ἡμᾶς πλουσίως διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ τοῦ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
ἐξέχεενexecheen”poured out” (aorist)to pour out liberally/abundantly, characteristic verb of the Spirit’s outpouring (cf. Acts 2:17-18, Joel 2:28-29)“poured out,” “lavished”Echoes Pentecostal outpouring language, tying regeneration (v.5) to the same Spirit poured out at Pentecost — the Spirit given, not earned.[NEW — Titus] nchuav / hliv rau (“poured out upon”). Risk: Low-Medium; comprehension-level note recommended linking to Pentecost imagery for teaching richness, no collision risk.
πλουσίωςplousiōs”richly, abundantly”generous, lavish measure”richly,” “abundantly,” “generously”Emphasizes the lavish generosity of the Spirit’s gift — matching mercy’s and grace’s characteristic abundance throughout the passage.[NEW — Titus] nplua nuj / ntau heev. Risk: Low.
διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ τοῦ σωτῆρος ἡμῶνdia Iēsou Christou tou sōtēros hēmōn”through Jesus Christ our Savior”the mediating agent through whom the Spirit is poured”through Jesus Christ our Savior”Explicitly names Christ as the mediating agent of the Spirit’s outpouring — supplies the “anchor to Yexus Khetos” the baseline’s salvation_save entry requires, retroactively covering v.5’s “he saved us.”[BASELINE TM] Yexus Khetos + [NEW — Titus] tus Cawmseej (Savior title, sixth and final occurrence in the letter). Risk: Critical for the Savior title (same tier as 1:3,1:4,2:10,2:13,3:4); Low for the Jesus Christ name itself (inherited stable baseline rendering).

Synthesis: Closes the Trinitarian shape of vv.4-6: the Father’s kindness/philanthropy (v.4) acts through mercy (v.5) via washing/regeneration/Spirit-renewal (v.5) poured out through the Son (v.6) — an implicitly Trinitarian salvation statement requiring careful, consistent handling of all three divine-Person titles.


Titus 3:7

ἵνα δικαιωθέντες τῇ ἐκείνου χάριτι κληρονόμοι γενηθῶμεν κατ᾽ ἐλπίδα ζωῆς αἰωνίου

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
δικαιωθέντεςdikaiōthentes”having been justified” (aorist passive participle)forensic declaration of righteous status”having been justified,” “made righteous”Names the legal outcome of the mercy/regeneration/Spirit-renewal complex of vv.5-6 — justification as the forensic verdict that follows from, but is distinct from, regeneration.[BASELINE TM] ua kom ncaj ncees / raug suav tias ncaj ncees. Risk: Critical (inherited). Must retain the reckoning/imputation qualifier exactly as the baseline mandates — this is one of Titus’s clearest links back to the Romans forensic-justification vocabulary and must not drift toward a moral-transformation reading even though it sits amid intensely transformation-oriented language (regeneration, renewal) in the same sentence-complex.
τῇ ἐκείνου χάριτιtē ekeinou chariti”by his grace”instrumental dative — grace as the means of justification”by his grace,” “through his grace”Grace, not works (v.5), is again named as the operative cause — bookending the passage’s works/grace contrast (2:11 grace appeared; 3:5 not by works; 3:7 by his grace).[BASELINE TM] txiaj ntsim. Risk: Critical (inherited).
κληρονόμοιklēronomoi”heirs”those who receive an inheritance”heirs”Justification results in heirship — a legal/familial status of guaranteed future inheritance.[BASELINE TM] tus qub txeeg qub teg. Risk: Low (inherited); positive resonance with Hmong lineage-inheritance custom, as noted in the Romans baseline.
κατ᾽ ἐλπίδα ζωῆς αἰωνίουkat’ elpida zōēs aiōniou”according to/in hope of eternal life”hope as the mode/ground of the inheritance’s certainty”in the hope of eternal life,” “with the hope of eternal life”Ties the whole salvation unit (vv.4-7) back to the “blessed hope” of v.13, closing the passage’s inclusio.[BASELINE TM] kev cia siab + txoj sia nyob mus ib txhis. Risk: Low (inherited).

Synthesis: Verse 7 supplies the forensic outcome (justification) and its guaranteed result (heirship, hope of eternal life) of the mercy/regeneration complex — deliberately reconnecting Titus’s soteriology to Romans’s forensic-justification vocabulary via identical TM terms.


Titus 3:8

Πιστὸς ὁ λόγος, καὶ περὶ τούτων βούλομαί σε διαβεβαιοῦσθαι, ἵνα φροντίζωσιν καλῶν ἔργων προΐστασθαι οἱ πεπιστευκότες Θεῷ. ταῦτά ἐστιν καλὰ καὶ ὠφέλιμα τοῖς ἀνθρώποις

GreekTransliterationLiteral MeaningSemantic RangeEnglish VariantsContextual Theological MeaningHmong Rendering & Risk
Πιστὸς ὁ λόγοςpistos ho logos”faithful/trustworthy is the saying”a formulaic marker distinctive to the Pastoral Epistles, certifying the preceding statement as reliable, creed-like teaching”This is a trustworthy saying,” “This is a faithful saying”Formally seals vv.4-7 as authoritative, memorizable, creed-like doctrine — signals to the reader that what precedes is settled teaching, not speculative opinion (contrasted with the “foolish controversies” rejected in v.9).[NEW — Titus] Tej lus no muaj tseeb thiab tsim nyog ntseeg tag nrho (“This saying is true and fully worthy of belief”). Risk: Low-Medium. Formulaic marker; comprehension-level note recommended (this exact formula recurs in 1 Timothy and 2 Timothy and should be rendered identically across any future Pastoral-Epistles curriculum for consistency).
διαβεβαιοῦσθαιdiabebaiousthai”to insist confidently, affirm strongly”to speak with firm, confident assurance”insist on,” “affirm confidently,” “stress”Titus is charged to teach these truths with confident insistence — pastoral urgency appropriate to Critical-tier doctrine.[NEW — Titus] hais ruaj siab txog. Risk: Low.
φροντίζωσιν … προΐστασθαιphrontizōsin … proistasthai”take care to … devote themselves to/engage in”φροντίζω = be thoughtfully concerned/careful about; προΐστημι = stand before, take the lead in, devote oneself to”be careful to devote themselves to,” “make it their aim to practice”Names the practical outworking expected of believers — deliberate, careful pursuit of good works, again as consequence of belief (οἱ πεπιστευκότες, “those who have believed”), not its cause.[NEW — Titus] ua tib zoo khwv siab ua (“carefully devote themselves to doing”). Risk: Low-Medium.
καλῶν ἔργωνkalōn ergōn”good works”(as above, recurring)“good works”Fifth and final occurrence of the letter’s “good works” refrain (1:16 negative; 2:7,14; 3:1,8,14 positive) — closing bracket of the works-as-fruit theme that has been carefully distinguished throughout from 3:5’s works-as-excluded-ground.[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL, same term as 2:14/3:1/3:5/3:14] tej haujlwm zoo. Risk: Critical (cross-referenced; see 2:14 and 3:5 notes above for the full works-as-fruit/works-as-ground distinction this term requires).
οἱ πεπιστευκότες Θεῷhoi pepisteukotes Theō”those who have believed God”perfect participle — a settled, completed state of belief with ongoing effect”those who have believed in God,” “believers”Names the subject of good-works-pursuit precisely as believers (not the unconverted, not those seeking to earn belief) — works follow believing, never precede or produce it.[BASELINE TM] cov ntseeg (from kev ntseeg / ntseeg). Risk: Medium (inherited); the baseline’s requirement to anchor faith explicitly to its object (here, Vajtswv/God, stated directly by Θεῷ) is satisfied in the source text itself.
ὠφέλιμαōphelima”profitable, beneficial”practically useful/advantageous”profitable,” “beneficial,” “excellent”Closes the unit with a pragmatic commendation — sound doctrine and good works are not abstract but demonstrably good for people.[NEW — Titus] muaj qab hau rau / pab tau. Risk: Low.

Synthesis: Verse 8 closes the core passage with a formal “trustworthy saying” seal over vv.4-7 and restates the works-as-fruit-of-belief principle, directly launching into v.9’s warning against divisive, “unprofitable” (ἀνωφελεῖς, deliberately contrasted with this verse’s ὠφέλιμα) controversies — a rhetorical hinge into the next unit.


PART B — Full-Book Chapter-by-Chapter Survey

Chapter 1 (Titus 1:1-16)

1:1-4 — Salutation and apostolic commission. Introduces several terms load-bearing for the whole letter:

English TermGreekTransliterationLiteral/Semantic NotesHmong RenderingRiskNotes
Servant/slave (of God)δοῦλοςdoulosPaul’s self-designation, total ownership[BASELINE TM] qhevHigh (inherited)Reuse Romans #10 note on honored voluntary bondservice.
Apostleἀπόστολοςapostolosauthorized, sent envoy[BASELINE TM] tus Tub TxibMedium (inherited)Reuse Romans #9 note.
Faith (of God’s elect)πίστιςpistisbelief/trust[BASELINE TM] kev ntseegMedium (inherited)
God’s electἐκλεκτῶν Θεοῦeklektōn Theouthose chosen by God[NEW — Titus] cov uas Vajtswv xaiv, built directly on [BASELINE TM] election_choose (kev xaiv (Vajtswv xaiv raws li nws lub siab nyiam))Critical (inherited collision)Must retain the volitional clause; never hmoov vocabulary, per Romans baseline #54.
Full knowledge of the truthἐπίγνωσις ἀληθείαςepignōsis alētheiasthorough, experiential knowledge[NEW — Titus] kev paub meej txog qhov tseeb, built on [BASELINE TM] qhov tseebLow-MediumComprehension-level compound.
Godlinessεὐσέβειαeusebeiareverent piety toward God[NEW — Titus, headline term] kev hwm VajtswvHighHwm also used for ancestor/spirit veneration (hwm dab, hwm poj koob yawm txwv); object must always be stated. Central to Doctrine “Grace That Trains for Godly Living.”
God who does not lieἀψευδὴς Θεόςapseudēs TheosGod incapable of falsehood[NEW — Titus] Vajtswv uas tsis dag ntxiasLowSets up deliberate contrast with 1:12’s “Cretans are always liars.”
Manifested / made knownἐφανέρωσενephanerōsenrevealed openly[NEW — Titus] tau qhia tawm losLowRelated to but distinct from the ἐπιφαίνω “appearing” word-family of 2:11-3:4 (different Greek root; should not be conflated in translation).
Preaching/proclamationκήρυγμαkērygmathe message proclaimed[NEW — Titus] tej lus tshaj tawmLow
Commandἐπιταγήepitagēauthoritative directive[NEW — Titus] lus samhwmLow-MediumRecurs 2:15; render identically.
Saviorσωτήρsōtērone who saves/rescues (title)[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL, first of 6 occurrences] tus CawmseejCriticalApplied to God (1:3) and to Christ (1:4) in successive verses — establishes the title-sharing pattern completed at 2:13/3:4/3:6.
Grace and peaceχάρις καὶ εἰρήνηcharis kai eirēnēstandard epistolary greeting[BASELINE TM] txiaj ntsim + kev thaj yeebCritical/Low (inherited)
True/genuine childγνήσιον τέκνονgnēsion teknonauthentic spiritual offspring[NEW — Titus] tus metub tiag tiagLowDescribes Titus’s relationship to Paul.

1:5-9 — Elder/overseer qualifications. The chapter’s most doctrinally load-bearing unit for “Qualifications for Elders”:

English TermGreekTransliterationNotesHmong RenderingRisk
Elder (church office)πρεσβύτεροςpresbyterosoffice-holder, used interchangeably with ἐπίσκοπος in this passage (v.5→v.7)[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL] tus txwj laus hauv pawg ntseegHigh
Overseer/bishopἐπίσκοποςepiskoposone who watches over/superintends[NEW — Titus] tus saib xyuas pawg ntseegMedium-High
Appointκαθίστημιkatastēsēto set in place, install to office[NEW — Titus] tsa kom uaLow-Medium
Set right what remainsἐπιδιορθώσῃepidiorthōsēto correct/complete unfinished matters[NEW — Titus] kho kom raugLow
Above reproachἀνέγκλητοςanegklētosno valid accusation can be brought[NEW — Titus] tsis muaj chaw thuamMedium
Husband of one wifeμιᾶς γυναικὸς ἀνήρmias gynaikos anērone-wife fidelity qualification[NEW — Titus] yog tus txiv ntawm ib tug poj niam xwbHigh
Debauchery/dissipationἀσωτίαasōtiareckless, morally loose living[NEW — Titus] kev ua neeg lom zem dhau lawmLow-Medium
Insubordinate/rebelliousἀνυπότακτοςanypotaktosnot submitted to authority[NEW — Titus] tsis mloog lus / tsis nyob hauv kev tswjMedium
Stewardοἰκονόμοςoikonomoshousehold manager[NEW — Titus] tus saib xyuas vaj tsevLow-Medium
Self-willed/arrogantαὐθάδηςauthadēsstubbornly self-pleasing[NEW — Titus] khav theeb, ua raws li nws lub siab xwbLow
Quick-temperedὀργίλοςorgilosprone to anger[NEW — Titus] npau taws yoojyimLow
Given to wineπάροινοςparoinoshabitual drinker[NEW — Titus] quav cawvLow
Violent/pugnaciousπλήκτηςplēktēsprone to physical violence[NEW — Titus] nyiam ntaus neegLow
Greedy for gainαἰσχροκερδήςaischrokerdēsfond of dishonest profit[NEW — Titus] nyiam tau nyiaj txiaj ntawm txoj kev tsis ncajLow-Medium
Hospitableφιλόξενοςphiloxenosloving toward strangers/guests[NEW — Titus] hlub qhuaLow
Lover of goodφιλάγαθοςphilagathosdevoted to what is good[NEW — Titus] nyiam qhov zooLow
Self-controlled/sensibleσώφρωνsōphrōn(recurring headline term, see 2:12)[NEW — Titus, recurring] kev tswj tus kheejMedium
Just/righteousδίκαιοςdikaios[BASELINE TM] tus ncaj nceesCritical (inherited)
Holy/devoutὅσιοςhosios[NEW — Titus] dawb huv (reuse root)Medium
Self-controlled/disciplinedἐγκρατήςegkratēs(distinct near-synonym to σώφρων)[NEW — Titus] kev tswj lub siabMedium
Sound doctrineδιδασκαλία ὑγιαίνουσαdidaskalia hygiainousa”healthy” teaching[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL, headline term] kev qhia tseeb uas raug caiCritical
Those who contradictἀντιλέγοντεςantilegontesopponents of sound teaching[NEW — Titus] cov cav tawm tsamLow-Medium
Rebuke/refuteἐλέγχεινelegcheinexpose and correct error[NEW — Titus] cem / qhuab ntuas (reuse 2:15 rendering)Low-Medium

Doctrinal note (Elder/Overseer equivalence): Verses 5 and 7 use πρεσβύτερος and ἐπίσκοπος for what the passage treats as the same office, an important ecclesiological point for the “Qualifications for Elders” doctrine — teaching materials must make this equivalence explicit rather than implying two separate offices. The double collision risk is: (a) tus txwj laus imports strong Hmong clan-elder political and ancestor-ritual authority connotations that must be explicitly bounded to “in the congregation” (hauv pawg ntseeg); (b) tus saib xyuas (overseer) risks under-communicating the office’s teaching authority if rendered too generically as “caretaker.”

1:10-16 — False teachers denounced.

English TermGreekTransliterationNotesHmong RenderingRisk
Empty talkersματαιολόγοιmataiologoispeakers of vain/futile words[NEW — Titus] cov hais lus tsis muaj qab hauLow
Deceiversφρεναπάταιphrenapataimind-deceivers[NEW — Titus] cov dag ntxias lub siabLow-Medium
Circumcision partyοἱ ἐκ τῆς περιτομῆςhoi ek tēs peritomēsJewish-Christian legalist faction[BASELINE TM] kev txiav (raws li Txoj Kevcai Mauxes)Medium (inherited)
Silence/muzzleἐπιστομίζεινepistomizeinstop someone’s mouth[NEW — Titus] kaw qhov ncaujLow
Overturn (households)ἀνατρέπουσινanatrepousindestroy/upset[NEW — Titus] ua rau puas tsuajMedium
Prophet (of pagan poet)προφήτηςprophētēsPaul quotes the Cretans’ “own prophet” (the poet Epimenides)[NEW — Titus] tus kws sau lus (avoid the fixed scriptural-authority term tus yaj saub)Medium
Liarsψεῦσταιpseustai[NEW — Titus] cov neeg dag ntxiasLow
Myths/fablesμῦθοιmythoispeculative, fanciful tales (likely Jewish-gnostic speculative genealogical myths)[NEW — Titus] zaj lus dab neegMedium-High
Pure / defiledκαθαρός / μεμιαμμένοςkatharos / memiammenosritual/moral purity vs. defilement[NEW — Titus] dawb huv / qias tsis huvMedium
Mindνοῦςnousthe rational faculty[NEW — Titus] lub tswv yimLow-Medium
Conscienceσυνείδησιςsyneidēsis[BASELINE TM] tej kev paub zoo paub phem hauv lub siabMedium (inherited)
Professὁμολογοῦσινhomologousinclaim/confess[NEW — Titus] lees paubLow
Disqualified/worthlessἀδόκιμοςadokimostested and found wanting[NEW — Titus] tsis tsim nyogLow-Medium

Chapter 2 (Titus 2:1-10) — [non-core portion; 2:11-15 treated in Part A]

2:1 — Transition. ὑγιαίνουσα διδασκαλία (sound doctrine) reused from 1:9/1:13.

2:2 — Older men.

English TermGreekTransliterationNotesHmong RenderingRisk
Older manπρεσβύτηςpresbytēsage-descriptor, NOT the office term πρεσβύτερος[NEW — Titus] tus txiv lausMedium
Sober/temperateνηφάλιοςnēphaliosclear-headed, not intoxicated (literal or figurative)[NEW — Titus] ntsws meej, tsis quav cawvLow
Dignified/respectableσεμνόςsemnosworthy of respect, serious-minded[NEW — Titus] coj tus cwj pwm zoo, tau ntsej muagLow
Self-controlledσώφρωνsōphrōn(recurring)kev tswj tus kheejMedium (inherited)
Sound in faith, love, enduranceὑγιαίνοντας τῇ πίστει, τῇ ἀγάπῃ, τῇ ὑπομονῇhygiainontas…health-metaphor applied to virtues[BASELINE TM] kev ntseeg, kev hlub, kev ua siab ntevMedium/Low/Low (inherited)

2:3 — Older women.

English TermGreekTransliterationNotesHmong RenderingRisk
Older womanπρεσβύτιςpresbytisage-descriptor[NEW — Titus] tus niam lausLow-Medium
Reverent in behaviorἱεροπρεπής (κατάστημα)hieroprepeis”priestly-fitting” demeanor (deliberately cultic-sounding adjective)[NEW — Titus] coj lub neej dawb huv thiab hwm VajtswvMedium
Slanderer (adj.)διάβολοςdiabolosmalicious gossip (adjectival use, not “the devil”)[NEW — Titus] hais lus xyov ua phem rau luagLow-Medium
Enslaved to wineοἴνῳ δεδουλωμέναςoinō dedoulōmenas[NEW — Titus] ua qhev rau cawvLow-Medium
Teacher of goodκαλοδιδάσκαλοςkalodidaskalosone who teaches what is good[NEW — Titus] tus qhia qhov zooLow

2:4-5 — Younger women.

English TermGreekTransliterationNotesHmong RenderingRisk
Train/admonishσωφρονίζωsōphronizōcausative form of σώφρων[NEW — Titus, recurring root] qhia kom paub tswj tus kheejMedium
Pure/chasteἁγνόςhagnosmoral/sexual purity[NEW — Titus] dawb huv, tsis muaj chaw thuamMedium
Keepers at homeοἰκουργόςoikourgosdomestic household management[NEW — Titus] tu tsev tu vajMedium
Submitting to their own husbandsὑποτασσομένας τοῖς ἰδίοις ἀνδράσινhypotassomenas…[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL, recurring] txo hwjchim nyob rau hauv lawv tus txivHigh (see 3:1 note)
Word of God blasphemedὁ λόγος τοῦ Θεοῦ βλασφημῆταιho logos tou Theou blasphēmētaiVajtswv Txoj Lus + raug thuam/hais phem rauLow-Medium

2:6-8 — Younger men and Titus’s example.

English TermGreekTransliterationNotesHmong RenderingRisk
Example/patternτύποςtyposmodel to imitate[NEW — Titus] tus qauvLow
Good worksκαλῶν ἔργωνkalōn ergōn(recurring, see 2:14 above)tej haujlwm zooCritical (cross-ref)
Integrity/incorruptibilityἀφθορίαaphthoriaundamaged moral wholeness[NEW — Titus] kev dawb huv tsis muaj chaw thuamLow-Medium
Beyond reproach (of speech)ἀκατάγνωστοςakatagnōstosnot condemnable[NEW — Titus] tsis muaj leejtwg thuam tauLow

2:9-10 — Slaves.

English TermGreekTransliterationNotesHmong RenderingRisk
Slavesδοῦλοιdouloi[BASELINE TM] qhevHigh (inherited)
Mastersδεσπόταιdespotaiowner of slaves[NEW — Titus] tus tswv qhevHigh
Submit in everythingὑποτάσσεσθαι ἐν πᾶσινhypotassesthai en pasin(recurring)txo hwjchim nyob rau hauv, txhua yamHigh (cross-ref)
Well-pleasingεὐάρεστοςeuarestospleasing/satisfactory[NEW — Titus] haum luag lub siabLow
Not talking backμὴ ἀντιλέγονταςmē antilegontasnot contradicting[NEW — Titus] tsis nkag pes cav rauLow
Not pilferingμὴ νοσφιζομένουςmē nosphizomenousnot stealing/embezzling[NEW — Titus] tsis ua tub sab me meLow
Adorn (teaching)κοσμῶσινkosmōsinmake attractive/beautify[NEW — Titus] ua kom Txoj Kev Qhia Zoo NkaujLow-Medium

Chapter 2 (Titus 2:11-15) — see Part A verse-by-verse above.

Chapter 3 (Titus 3:1-8) — see Part A verse-by-verse above.


Chapter 3 (Titus 3:9-15) — [non-core portion]

3:9-11 — Avoiding divisive controversies. The chapter’s most doctrinally load-bearing unit for “Avoiding Divisive Controversies”:

English TermGreekTransliterationNotesHmong RenderingRisk
Foolish controversiesμωραὶ ζητήσειςmōrai zētēseisspeculative, unproductive debates[NEW — Titus, CRITICAL] tej lus sib cav ruamHigh
Genealogiesγενεαλογίαιgenealogiaispeculative ancestral-lineage tales (likely Jewish/gnostic-influenced speculation, not genealogy-keeping per se)[NEW — Titus] keeb kwm xeemHigh
Quarrelsἔρειςereis[NEW — Titus] kev sib cavLow
Fights about the lawμάχαι νομικαίmachai nomikaidisputes over legal minutiae[NEW — Titus] kev sib ceg txog Txoj Kevcai, reusing [BASELINE TM] Txoj Kevcai qualifier-awarenessMedium
Avoidπεριΐστασοperiistasoshun, keep away from[NEW — Titus] tsis txhob koom nrogLow
Divisive/factious personαἱρετικὸς ἄνθρωποςhairetikos anthrōposone who causes/promotes factions[NEW — Titus] tus ua kom sib cais ua pab ua pawg, built on [BASELINE TM] divisions_factions (kev sib cais ua pab ua pawg)Medium
Warning/admonitionνουθεσίαnouthesiacorrective instruction[NEW — Titus] kev ntuasLow
Reject/have nothing to do withπαραιτοῦparaitourefuse fellowship with[NEW — Titus] tso tseg, tsis koom nrogLow
Perverted/warpedἐξέστραπταιexestraptaimorally twisted[NEW — Titus] siab phem tag lawmMedium
Self-condemnedαὐτοκατάκριτοςautokatakritoscondemns himself by his own actions[NEW — Titus] raug nws tus kheej txiav txim rau nws tus kheejLow

3:12-15 — Closing greetings and instructions. Predominantly proper names (Artemas, Tychicus, Zenas, Apollos, Nicopolis) rendered by standard transliteration convention; low risk throughout.

English TermGreekTransliterationNotesHmong RenderingRisk
Good works (final occurrence)καλῶν ἔργωνkalōn ergōn(recurring, sixth occurrence)tej haujlwm zooCritical (cross-ref)
Unfruitfulἄκαρποςakarposproducing no benefit[NEW — Titus] tsis muaj qab hauLow
Pressing needsἀναγκαῖαι χρεῖαιanagkaiai chreiaiurgent practical necessities[NEW — Titus] tej kev cheem tsum tseem ceebLow
Those who love us in the faithοἱ φιλοῦντες ἡμᾶς ἐν πίστειhoi philountes hēmas en pistei[BASELINE TM] kev hlub + kev ntseegLow (inherited)

Chapter 3 coverage confirmation: All three thematic units of chapter 3 (submission to authority, 3:1-2; grace/regeneration/salvation, 3:3-8, treated in Part A; avoidance of divisive controversy, 3:9-11; closing greetings, 3:12-15) have been explicitly reviewed above; no verse or unit has been silently skipped.


Summary of Cross-Cutting Risk Themes for Titus

  1. The “Savior” title (σωτήρ) is the letter’s single most repeated divine title (6x) applied identically to Father and Son — every occurrence is Critical-tier and must use the identical fixed Hmong title tus Cawmseej.
  2. The appearing-triad (ἐπιφαίνω word-family, 2:11/2:13/3:4) is a deliberate three-part literary-theological structure (grace appeared / glory will appear / kindness appeared) that must survive translation through consistent, tense-differentiated rendering.
  3. Good works (ἔργα) is used in two doctrinally opposite senses with the identical Greek word — excluded ground (3:5) vs. commanded fruit (1:16 negative example; 2:7,14; 3:1,8,14 positive) — and must retain the identical Hmong word in both senses while teaching notes carry the doctrinal distinction, exactly mirroring the discipline the Romans baseline requires for σάρξ (flesh).
  4. σώφρων and its word-family (self-controlled/sensible) is the letter’s most repeated ethical term (six occurrences) and requires strict lexical consistency despite no single Hmong word covering its range.
  5. Regeneration (παλιγγενεσία, 3:5) surfaces the single highest-priority new collision in this Language Package: risk of conflation with Hmong soul-reincarnation belief. This requires the same tier of mandatory contrast-teaching the baseline established for baptism and sanctification.
  6. Genealogies (γενεαλογίαι, 3:9) surfaces a second major new collision: direct tension with the central cultural/ritual role of clan genealogy in Hmong identity, requiring careful scope-limiting teaching.
  7. Elder/overseer office vocabulary (1:5-9) intersects with Hmong clan-elder (txwj laus) socio-ritual authority structures, requiring the mandatory congregational qualifier at every occurrence.
  8. The δεσπότης/κύριος lexical collision (2:9 “master” vs. the baseline’s “tus Tswv” for Lord) is a script-level (not doctrinal) risk unique to this book and requires a disambiguating phrase not needed in Romans.
  9. ὑποτάσσω (submission) spans three distinct social relationships (wife/husband 2:5; slave/master 2:9; citizen/ruler 3:1) with a single Greek verb and must be rendered with identical Hmong vocabulary across all three to preserve Paul’s structural argument, while teaching notes address the distinct application risks of each relationship.

All Critical and High-tier items identified above are routed to human theologian review per the baseline’s escalation rules (§9 of 12_ai_translation_requirements.md), and all newly-surfaced terms are logged here for formal TM-revision review rather than treated as silently permanent, per the baseline’s governing note (§10).

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.

Give feedback

How would you rate this page?

0 / 500 words