Executive Summary: Mark Curriculum Language Package — English → Kannada

Why it matters

The Mark curriculum anchors on Mark 10:35–45 — the ransom saying — the single most doctrinally concentrated passage yet handled in this pipeline. It stacks four Critical-risk terms in one paragraph (Son of Man, life/soul, ransom, substitutionary “in place of many”) atop a Gospel whose exorcism, discipleship, and burial vocabulary runs directly into three distinct Karnataka religious systems at once: Lingayat/Veerashaiva Shaiva theology, Haridasa Krishna-bhakti devotionalism, and — newly, for this book — coastal Karnataka’s Bhuta Kola/Daiva spirit-veneration tradition. Getting this book wrong doesn’t just blur a doctrine; in several places (ransom, tomb, necessity of the cross) it risks quietly converting the Gospel’s central claims into a locally familiar but theologically opposite story.

Key findings

• 46 doctrines identified across all 16 chapters of Mark, full-book coverage confirmed chapter-by-chapter with no silent omissions.
• 8 Critical-risk and 21 High-risk doctrines (29 total) require mandatory human theologian review — nearly two-thirds of all doctrines in this curriculum, a higher proportion than the Romans baseline, driven by Mark’s Passion Narrative density (chapters 8, 10, 14–16 alone carry 6 of the 8 Critical doctrines).
• At the term level, 18 Critical-risk and 24 High-risk terms (42 total) require theologian-level enforcement in assets/translation_memory.json and assets/bible_term_registry.json, alongside 21 Medium-risk and 10 Low-risk terms.
• The core passage (10:35–45) alone contains 4 Critical terms in a single verse (v.45): ಮನುಷ್ಯಕುಮಾರ (Son of Man), ಪ್ರಾಣ (life, not ಆತ್ಮ), ವಿಮೋಚನ ಕ್ರಯ (ransom), and ಅನೇಕರ ಬದಲಾಗಿ (substitutionary “in place of”).
• Three genuinely new syncretism vectors emerged that the Romans baseline never had to address: (1) ಭೂತ vs. ದೆವ್ವ/ಅಶುದ್ಧಾತ್ಮ for demons (Bhuta Kola spirit-honoring risk), (2) ಸಮಾಧಿ for “tomb” (guru jīva-samādhi shrine risk, directly threatening the resurrection doctrine), and (3) ದಾಸ for “slave/servant” (Haridasa bhakti devotee-surrender risk).

Risks

• Ransom (λύτρον, Mark 10:45) — the highest-priority single term in the curriculum. ವಿಮೋಚನ ಕ್ರಯ sits directly adjacent to the moksha/mukti liberation-from-samsara vocabulary family; an unfenced rendering could convert Christ’s one-time substitutionary payment into a self-attained or cyclical liberation.
• Tomb (μνημεῖον, Mark 15:46, 16:1–8) — ಸಮಾಧಿ also names yogic meditative-absorption states and guru/saint burial shrines believed to house an ongoingly “present” teacher; unfenced, this could reframe the empty tomb as consistent with a guru’s continuing subtle presence rather than genuine bodily resurrection — the opposite of Mark 16:6’s point.
• Necessity of the cross (δεῖ, Mark 8:31 etc.) — ಆಗಲೇಬೇಕು sits one associative step from ಹಣೆಬರಹ (fatalism) and ಕರ್ಮದ ನಿಯಮ, Karnataka’s two most common everyday explanatory frameworks for suffering.
• Son of Man Christology (14 occurrences) — risk of collapsing into either “mere human” (compatible with a Lingayat Sharana-who-attained-Aikya reading) or into an undifferentiated synonym for “Son of God,” losing Daniel 7’s distinct authority-bearing background.
• Slave/servant vocabulary (10:43–44) — ದಾಸ and ಸೇವಕ both carry strong positive resonance in Karnataka’s devotional and reform traditions (Haridasa bhakti, Lingayat kayaka-dāsōha) that could redirect Jesus’s status-reversal ethic toward devotee-surrender or merit-accumulating sacred labor.
• Demon/unclean spirit vocabulary — any drift toward ಭೂತ would contradict Mark’s entire exorcism theology by importing Tulu Nadu’s honored-spirit category.

Opportunities

• Karnataka’s own historic Lingayat anti-caste reform movement gives real, teachable common ground for Mark 7’s purity-code teaching and the curriculum’s universal-accountability doctrine, provided the positive claim (heart-defilement requiring forgiveness) is taught alongside the shared critique of external boundary-markers.
• The childlike-faith teaching (10:13-16) and the necessity-of-the-cross doctrine both offer a clean, teachable contrast with the Lingayat shatsthala path’s staged, effort-based spiritual ascent — kingdom entry and salvation here are received, not achieved in stages.
• Mark’s own bilingual practice (Talitha koum, Ephphatha, Abba, Eloi Eloi lema sabachthani) supplies a ready-made translation model: transliterate, then gloss, exactly as the author himself does — reducing translator guesswork on several Aramaic/Hebrew-preserved sayings.
• The dāsa/sēvaka cultural bridge, carefully fenced, allows teaching material to affirm the genuine dignity-of-service instinct already present in Karnataka religious culture while still redirecting it toward Christ-patterned, others-oriented servanthood rather than merit-seeking devotion.

Recommended actions

1. Lock all Mark-specific coinages (ವಿಮೋಚನ ಕ್ರಯ, ಅನೇಕರ ಬದಲಾಗಿ, ಮನುಷ್ಯಕುಮಾರ, ಆಗಲೇಬೇಕು, ಪ್ರಾಣ) into assets/translation_memory.json before Phase 2 begins, with the same zero-substitution enforcement as the Romans baseline’s Critical terms.
2. Route Mark 10:35–45 as a single indivisible reviewer unit in Phase 2 Step 17, given its unmatched density of interacting Critical terms.
3. Require the mandatory translator’s note at every occurrence of ವಿಮೋಚನ ಕ್ರಯ, ಸಮಾಧಿ (resurrection contexts), ಪ್ರಾಣ (self-giving contexts), and ದಾಸ (10:44) — build this into Phase 2 tooling as an automatic requirement, not a style suggestion.
4. Brief all assigned theologian reviewers on the three new Karnataka-specific syncretism vectors (Bhuta Kola, jīva-samādhi guru shrines, Haridasa dāsa-surrender) before review begins, since these fall outside the syncretism patterns the Romans baseline reviewers were originally trained against.
5. Maintain strict verbatim consistency across all curriculum documents for the nine flagged passages (1:1, 1:14–15, 8:29, 8:31, 8:34–38, 10:45, 14:22–25, 14:61–62, 15:39, 16:6) per 12_ai_translation_requirements.md.

---

Counts verified against assets/doctrine_risk_registry.json (46 doctrines: 8 Critical, 21 High, 13 Medium, 4 Low; 29 requiring theologian review) and assets/bible_term_registry.json (73 terms: 18 Critical, 24 High, 21 Medium, 10 Low; 42 requiring theologian review).