Linguistic Gap Analysis — Genesis (Hindi)

Purpose

This document identifies where Hindi has no adequate native term for a Genesis doctrine (missing vocabulary), where Hindi has too many overlapping native terms whose Hindu-tradition associations threaten doctrinal drift (crowded semantic neighborhoods requiring “fencing”), which terms should be transliterated versus paraphrased, and which ambiguities in this book carry the highest translation risk. It extends the baseline Romans/Galatians Language Package without contradicting it, and covers the entire book of Genesis (chapters 1–50), not only the core passage (1:1–2:3). Findings here underlie the term entries subsequently formalized in 08_core_glossary.md and the Genesis additions to translation_memory.json / bible_term_registry.json / doctrine_risk_registry.json.

All risk tiers (Critical/High/Medium/Low) and review-routing conventions follow the baseline exactly. All established baseline renderings (अनुग्रह, धार्मिकता, उद्धार, पुनरुत्थान, देहधारण, सामर्थ्य, पवित्र आत्मा, वाचा, प्रतिज्ञा, वंश, आशीष, etc.) are reused unchanged; this document does not revisit decisions already settled in the baseline except where Genesis introduces a genuinely new collision.

---

1. Doctrine Vocabulary Matrix

Doctrine	Available Hindi terms	Weaknesses / gaps	Recommended strategy
Creation Ex Nihilo	सृष्टि करना / सृजा (bara); आदि में (bereshit); निराकार और सुनसान (tohu wa-bohu); परमेश्वर का आत्मा (ruach Elohim merachefet); परमेश्वर ने कहा (vayomer Elohim)	सृष्टि in Hindu usage names the emanation phase of an eternal सृष्टि-स्थिति-संहार (creation-preservation-destruction) cycle under Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva, in which creation is not ultimately distinct from Brahman. आदि echoes आदि पुरुष / आदिशक्ति (Hindu primal-being/primal-power language). Neither term alone signals “once-for-all, ex nihilo, by a Creator ontologically distinct from creation.”	Mandatory translator note on every बारा occurrence (1:1,21,27; 2:3-4; 5:1-2) stating: (a) free act of a personal Creator distinct from what he creates; (b) a singular historical act, not one turn of a repeating cycle; (c) ex nihilo, without pre-existing material. Never let सृष्टि stand in running text without this doctrinal framing available in the accompanying study notes.
The Image of God	स्वरूप (tselem); समानता (demut); अधिकार रखना / अधीन करना (dominion mandate)	स्वरूप in Hindu devotional usage denotes a deity’s own true form/manifestation (svarūpa); a guru is sometimes described as embodying divine svarūpa. Used alone, स्वरूप risks an avatar-adjacent reading of humanity as a divine emanation rather than a creature bearing derivative representation.	Always pair स्वरूप with समानता (never स्वरूप standing alone in a doctrinal statement). Mandatory theologian-reviewed translator note on every occurrence (1:26-27; 5:1,3; 9:6): humans are creatures, not divine in essence, not avatars, not emanations — they represent and reflect God while remaining ontologically distinct from him. Anchor 9:6 as the Bible’s own ethical outworking (sanctity of life, anti-caste human dignity).
The Fall and the Origin of Sin	पाप (chattath/sin); सर्प (serpent); श्राप/श्रापित (curse); लज्जा (shame); उनकी आँखें खुल गयीं (eyes opened); चमड़े के वस्त्र (garments of skin)	सर्प risks importing Indian nāga-veneration, Śeṣa Nāga imagery, and kuṇḍalinī “serpent power” associations that soften the serpent’s deceptive, judged role. श्राप in popular usage denotes a personal, sometimes ritually-liftable curse. “Eyes opened” risks a positive जागरण/बोध (“awakening/enlightenment”) misreading, the opposite of the text’s tragic guilt-discovery sense.	Mandatory translator notes: on सर्प (this creature’s role is exclusively negative, deceptive, and cursed — not to be read through nāga-reverence); on श्राप (God’s fixed judicial verdict, never a liftable folk-curse); on the eyes-opened idiom (tragic self-discovery of guilt/shame, not liberating insight). Keep पाप (act), अपराध/दोष (avon, resulting guilt), and अशुद्ध (tame, defilement) as three lexically distinct categories throughout the book.
The Abrahamic Covenant and Promise	वाचा (covenant); प्रतिज्ञा (promise); वंश (theological seed); आशीष (blessing); वाचा बाँधना (cut a covenant); खतना (circumcision)	वरदान (a deity’s boon for austerity/devotion) and आशीर्वाद (a guru/elder’s reciprocal favor) are both forbidden — either would make the promise merit-conditioned, the reverse of Genesis 12/15’s own logic. वंश must be kept lexically distinct from the botanical बीज across all fifty chapters or the seed→Seed literary trajectory (culminating in Christ) disappears.	Enforce वंश/बीज as a fixed, book-wide lexical fence. प्रतिज्ञा never वरदान; आशीष never आशीर्वाद. Flag the unilateral covenant ceremony of Genesis 15 (God alone passes between the pieces) and the El Shaddai/circumcision cluster of Genesis 17 for mandatory theologian review.
Providence and the Sovereignty of God	परमेश्वर का विधान (providence); परमेश्वर की संप्रभुता (sovereignty); परमेश्वर का चुनाव (election); स्मरण किया (God remembering); परमेश्वर ने उसे भलाई के लिये ठहराया (Genesis 50:20)	Colloquial paraphrase of “God’s plan” or “it was meant to be” easily drifts toward भाग्य/नियति/किस्मत/कर्म का नियम — all already forbidden by the baseline but easy to reintroduce informally in teaching prose about Joseph or the flood. “God remembered” (8:1; 9:15-16) risks being heard as lapse-and-recall memory rather than active covenant intervention.	Apply the baseline fate/karma prohibition list to every providence-themed passage in Genesis (12–50), not only to Romans/Galatians vocabulary. Require verbatim-identical rendering of Genesis 50:20 wherever it recurs in later curriculum documents (parallel to the baseline’s Romans 8:28 consistency rule). Teaching note on Genesis 6:6 (God’s grief) must hold real relational sorrow and unchanging divine character in tension without resolving it inside the translation itself.
Sin’s Consequences and Common Grace	श्राप/श्रापित (curse); सामान्य कृपा (common grace, new coinage); चिन्ह (protective sign, mark of Cain)	सामान्य कृपा is a newly coined compound with no fixed prior place in Hindi Christian tradition; dropping सामान्य would collapse it into अनुग्रह (saving grace), erasing the doctrinal distinction between universal sustaining kindness and salvific grace. Genesis 9:20-27 (Ham/Canaan) carries a documented history of race/caste-hierarchy misuse.	Never drop the सामान्य qualifier from सामान्य कृपा. Attach a mandatory anti-caste/anti-race disclaimer note to every teaching treatment of the Ham/Canaan narrative, consistent with the baseline’s impartiality_of_god commitments.
Covenant Faithfulness across Generations	वाचा (covenant); स्मरण किया (remembering); नाम परिवर्तन (name change); करुणा (chesed, new coinage); देख, मैं तेरे साथ हूँ (God-with-you); इस्राएल — परमेश्वर से जूझनेवाला (Israel-wrestles)	No single, settled Hindi Christian equivalent for chesed exists; करुणा is a proposed coinage that, unfenced, risks collapsing into either दया (mercy/compassion) or अनुग्रह (saving grace), both already assigned distinct baseline meanings. The etymology of “Israel” (32:28) risks being read as a human “defeating” or “overpowering” God rather than tenacious, dependent wrestling that ends in blessing-through-weakness.	Maintain a three-way lexical fence: करुणा (covenant-loyal love within an established relationship) ≠ दया (compassion toward the miserable) ≠ अनुग्रह (unmerited saving favor) — glossed together wherever any one occurs near the others. Theologian review on every israel_wrestles occurrence, emphasizing Jacob receives a blessing and a limp (32:25,31) — dependence, not victory by strength, is the point.
Joseph and God’s Providence in Suffering	परमेश्वर ने मुझे भेजा (providence_in_suffering); परमेश्वर ने उसे भलाई के लिये ठहराया (god_meant_it_for_good); अपराध/दोष (avon_guilt); स्वप्न (dream); वह परमेश्वर जो मेरा चरवाहा रहा है (shepherd care)	Risk of two opposite errors: (a) fatalism — reading Genesis 45/50 as denying the brothers’ real moral guilt because “God sent me”; (b) an autonomy reading that denies God’s overruling sovereignty. स्वप्न (dream) risks tacitly endorsing ongoing dream-interpretation/astrology as a legitimate guidance practice, given its prominence in Indian popular religion.	Theologian note mandatory on every occurrence of 45:5-8 and 50:20 holding together genuine human guilt (the brothers truly sinned) and God’s sovereign good purpose in and through that evil, without excusing the sin or denying the sovereignty. Restrict the legitimacy of स्वप्न as revelatory to this specific historical narrative setting; do not generalize into endorsement of dream-divination practice.

---

2. Missing Vocabulary vs. Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods

2.1 Missing Vocabulary (no adequate native Hindi term; requires coinage, compounding, or mandatory note)

Gap	Why Hindi lacks a ready term	Resolution adopted
chesed (covenant-loyal love)	Hindi’s existing love/kindness vocabulary (अनुग्रह, दया, कृपा, प्रेम) is already assigned to other Hebrew/Greek concepts by the baseline; none names specifically loyal, active love within an established relationship.	New coinage करुणा, fenced against अनुग्रह and दया with mandatory clarifying note on first use per document (24:12,14; 39:21; 47:29).
Common grace as a theological category	No prior Hindi Christian term distinguishes universal, non-salvific divine kindness from साving grace.	New compound सामान्य कृपा; कृपा alone forbidden as a stand-in.
Ex nihilo creation as a single concept	No native single word captures “created from nothing, by fiat, once for all, by a Creator ontologically distinct from creation.”	Compound सृष्टि करना / सृजा plus mandatory translator note (see Matrix above).
nephesh chayyah (whole animated living being)	Hindi’s nearest single word, जीव, denotes in Hindu/Jain philosophy an eternal, individually distinct transmigrating soul — a different ontological category entirely.	Compound जीवित प्राणी adopted; जीव rejected as primary rendering.
Three-way sin/guilt/impurity distinction (chattath / avon / tame)	Colloquial Hindi tends to flatten “sin,” “guilt,” and “impurity” into overlapping usage of पाप.	Fixed three-term fence: पाप (act) / अपराध-दोष (avon, resulting guilt) / अशुद्ध (tame, defilement) — kept lexically distinct throughout.
tselem + demut as “image-without-divine-essence”	No single Hindi word conveys resemblance-without-identity-of-essence; existing candidates (स्वरूप, रूप, प्रतिरूप) each carry either devotional-manifestation or purely visual-copy connotations.	Mandatory paired rendering (स्वरूप + समानता) plus theologian note, rather than searching for one perfect single word.

2.2 Crowded Semantic Neighborhoods (Hindi has abundant native vocabulary, but it collides with Hindu theological categories and must be fenced)

Hindi term/root	Competing Hindu-tradition sense	Fence already established (baseline)	Genesis-specific extension of the fence
सृष्टि	Emanation-phase of an eternal cosmic cycle (Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva)	N/A (new to Genesis)	Mandatory translator note on every बारा occurrence (see Matrix, Creation Ex Nihilo)
आदि	आदि पुरुष / आदिशक्ति (Hindu primal being/power)	N/A (new to Genesis)	Note at 1:1 distinguishing a datable historical starting point from a Hindu primal principle
स्वरूप	Deity’s own true manifest form (svarūpa); guru embodying divine svarūpa	N/A (new to Genesis)	Mandatory pairing with समानता + theologian note at every occurrence
शक्ति (root inside सर्वशक्तिमान)	Hindu goddess Shakti / impersonal cosmic force	Baseline forbids शक्ति for “power of God” (→ सामर्थ्य)	El Shaddai’s सर्वशक्तिमान परमेश्वर retained ONLY as a fixed, established compound title; never re-extended to general “power of God” contexts, which remain governed by सामर्थ्य
जाति	Social caste	N/A (new to Genesis)	kind_species (1:11-25) requires a clarifying note every occurrence that जाति here means biological kind, not social caste; प्रकार offered as a lower-risk alternative in some instances
मुक्ति / मोक्ष	Self-attained liberation from samsara	Baseline forbids for “salvation”/“freedom”	No Genesis term uses these; flagged here only to confirm the ban extends to any paraphrase of “deliverance” language in Genesis (e.g., flood deliverance, Joseph’s deliverance of his family)
धर्म	Cosmic duty/moral order	Baseline forbids for “righteousness”/“law”	Extended explicitly to धार्मिकता (Noah, 6:9; Tamar, 38:26) and व्यवस्था (pre-Sinai sense, 26:5)
कर्म	Merit-accumulation across lifetimes	Baseline forbids for “works”	Extended to avon_guilt (44:16) and any paraphrase of “consequences of sin” language across the Joseph narrative — never कर्म-फल for guilt or consequence
आत्मा	Both “Holy Spirit,” the believer’s own inner self, and (in Hindu usage) an impersonal universal Self/ātman	Baseline requires पवित्र आत्मा be read as the personal third Person of the Trinity	Genesis 1:2’s परमेश्वर का आत्मा (ruach Elohim) requires the same personal-Spirit anchoring at the very first occurrence in Scripture, guarding against a “cosmic wind/impersonal energy” reading at the outset
प्राण	Universal impersonal vital energy (yogic physiology)	Flagged in baseline’s walk_by_the_spirit entry	breath_of_life (2:7) must avoid प्राण alone; use जीवन की सांस to keep the act personal and particular, not participatory in a cosmic energy field
नाग / सर्प	Reverence (nāga-worship), Śeṣa Nāga as Vishnu’s couch, kuṇḍalinī “serpent power”	N/A (new to Genesis)	Mandatory note on every serpent occurrence in Genesis 3 that this creature’s role is exclusively negative and judged
जागरण / बोध	Positive spiritual awakening/enlightenment	N/A (new to Genesis)	“Eyes opened” (3:7) must be rendered so as NOT to evoke this positive semantic field
वरदान	Deity’s boon granted for austerity/devotion	Baseline forbids for “promise”	Extended to every आशीष/प्रतिज्ञा occurrence across the whole Abrahamic narrative, not only Galatians
आशीर्वाद	Guru/elder’s reciprocal-favor blessing	Baseline forbids for “blessing”	Extended identically across all patriarchal blessing scenes (12:2-3; 27; 48-49)
जीव	Eternal individually-distinct transmigrating soul (esp. Jain usage)	N/A (new to Genesis)	living_being_nephesh (1:24,30; 2:7,19) uses जीवित प्राणी instead
चढ़ावा	Hindu temple ritual-offering vocabulary	N/A (new to Genesis)	minchah (4:3-5) rendered भेंट, not चढ़ावा
पुरोहित / पंडित	Brahmanical/caste-linked Hindu ritual specialist	N/A (new to Genesis)	priest_kohen (14:18) rendered याजक, the established caste-neutral Hindi Christian term

---

3. Transliteration vs. Paraphrase Decisions

Governing principle: Transliterate (a) proper names and places; (b) fixed compound divine titles already established in BSI Hindi Bible tradition; (c) terms whose referent is genuinely contested in scholarship, where translating would force a premature exegetical resolution the source text itself withholds. Paraphrase/translate (a) common nouns and theological action-verbs, where an imperfect but intelligible Hindi rendering (with a note) conveys real meaning; (b) idioms, where transliteration would be meaningless to the reader.

Term	Decision	Rationale
יהוה (YHWH)	Transliterate — यहोवा	Personal covenant name; never translated as generic “God,” never rendered with any Hindu deity’s proper name.
El Shaddai	Hybrid — सर्वशक्तिमान परमेश्वर	Established fixed BSI compound title; transliterating “El Shaddai” alone would be opaque to readers, but the शक्ति root requires the restriction noted in §2.2.
El Elyon	Paraphrase/translate — परम प्रधान परमेश्वर	A descriptive title, not a name distinct from परमेश्वर; must stay visibly tied to परमेश्वर so readers do not infer a second deity.
El Roi	Paraphrase/translate — वह परमेश्वर जो मुझे देखता है	Coined in-narrative by Hagar as a description, not a fixed liturgical title; full descriptive rendering preserves the personal, relational point.
Jehovah Jireh	Hybrid — यहोवा यिरअः with gloss (यहोवा उपलब्ध कराएगा)	Retains the personal-name element (यहोवा) while glossing the meaning, since the meaning itself (“the LORD will provide”) is the theological payload of the verse.
Peniel, Bethel, Mizpah	Transliterate — पनीएल, बेतेल, मिस्पा	Place-names; meaning explained in accompanying narrative text/notes, not folded into the transliterated form itself.
Isaac, Eve, Nephilim	Transliterate — इसहाक, हव्वा, नफीलीम	Established proper-name forms; Nephilim’s contested referent is deliberately left untranslated rather than resolved as “giants,” “fallen angels,” or “mighty men.”
Shiloh (49:10)	Transliterate — शीलो	Studied ambiguity of the referent must be preserved, not resolved by a translated paraphrase, parallel to the baseline’s israel_of_god precedent.
tselem / demut	Paraphrase/translate — स्वरूप / समानता	Already established BSI single-word renderings; transliterating the Hebrew would be meaningless to readers, so the doctrinal safeguard is carried by mandatory notes, not by transliteration.
bara (create ex nihilo)	Paraphrase/translate — सृष्टि करना / सृजा	A theological action-verb, not a proper noun; transliterating “bara” would convey nothing without extensive gloss, so paraphrase-plus-note is the only workable strategy.
ruach Elohim merachefet	Paraphrase/translate — परमेश्वर का आत्मा	Descriptive divine action; transliteration is not viable for an entire clause.
nishmat chayyim	Paraphrase/translate — जीवन की सांस	Same rationale; a descriptive compound conveys the personal, particular divine act.
chesed	Paraphrase/coinage — करुणा (not transliterated as “chesed”)	Transliterating a Hebrew technical term with no established Hindi Bible transliteration tradition would be opaque; a fenced native coinage is more teachable, provided the three-way fence in §2.2 is maintained.
shabat (Sabbath rest, Genesis 2)	Paraphrase/translate — विश्राम करना (not transliterated as सब्त)	At this pre-Sinai narrative stage the text describes God’s own act of ceasing, not yet the codified Sabbath institution; a descriptive verb keeps the theological point (completed, celebratory ceasing) foregrounded ahead of any later Torah-code association.
minchah	Paraphrase/translate — भेंट (never चढ़ावा)	A common noun; transliteration is unnecessary and translation carries the needed doctrinal safety when भेंट, not चढ़ावा, is chosen.
cherubim, Nephilim	Transliterate — करूब, नफीलीम	Contested or exotic referents better left as loanwords with explanatory notes than forced into a resolving translation.
olah / zevach (sacrifice)	Paraphrase/translate — बलिदान / होमबलि	Common nouns describing a real historical act; translation with a “must not be softened into metaphor” note is preferred over transliteration, which would obscure the concrete, literal sense.

---

4. Ranked List of Genesis’s Highest-Risk Ambiguities

Ranked by combined doctrinal centrality and syncretism/collision risk. All items below carry Critical or High risk per the doctrine_risk_registry conventions and require mandatory human theologian review at every occurrence unless otherwise noted.

1. Genesis 1:26-27 (and 5:1,3; 9:6) — image_of_god / likeness (Critical). स्वरूप’s devotional “deity’s own manifest form” sense risks an avatar/emanation misreading of humanity’s creaturely status. Mitigation: mandatory स्वरूप+समानता pairing and theologian note every occurrence.

2. Genesis 1:1 (and 1:21,27; 2:3-4; 5:1-2) — bara / creation ex nihilo (Critical). सृष्टि’s native association with an eternal creation-preservation-destruction cycle threatens to erase the once-for-all, ex nihilo, Creator-distinct-from-creation claim. Mitigation: mandatory translator note every occurrence.

3. Genesis 3:15 — protoevangelium_seed (Critical). The grammatical singular (“he shall crush”) is the fountainhead of the entire seed-promise trajectory culminating in Christ; a collapsed Hindi collective reading destroys the messianic-singular argument later echoed in Galatians 3:16. Mitigation: theologian review; explicit singular-referent preservation note.

4. Genesis 15:6 — imputed_righteousness (Critical). The OT source text for Romans 4 and Galatians 3’s entire justification-by-faith argument; abbreviating आरोपित धार्मिकता or drifting toward “earned” language would corrupt the doctrinal foundation of the whole New Testament argument built on this verse. Mitigation: compound phrase never abbreviated; theologian review.

5. Genesis 22:1-14 — jehovah_jireh / substitutionary atonement typology (Critical). The ram “in his son’s place” (v.13) is the OT’s clearest atonement type; a mistranslation could obscure the God-to-human gift-direction (God himself provides the substitute) that anchors later NT substitution language. Mitigation: theologian review with explicit note connecting to the baseline gave_himself_for_me entry.

6. Genesis 2:4 onward — Yahweh/Elohim interplay (Critical). Collapsing the personal covenant name यहोवा into generic परमेश्वर erases the deliberate narrative interplay between God’s universal creator-identity (Elohim, ch.1) and his personal covenant-keeping identity (Yahweh, from 2:4). Mitigation: consistent, deliberate rendering per occurrence; never silently merge the two.

7. Genesis 9:6 — image_of_god as ethical ground (Critical). The Bible’s own explicit derivation of universal human dignity and the sanctity of life from the image doctrine; softening this text would blunt its anti-caste, anti-hierarchy application. Mitigation: theologian review; explicit human-dignity application note.

8. Genesis 3:1-15 — serpent (High). Positive nāga/kuṇḍalinī associations in Indian religious culture threaten to soften the serpent’s deceptive, judged role. Mitigation: mandatory translator note on every occurrence.

9. Genesis 3:21 — garments_of_skin (High). An early substitutionary-atonement type (an animal dies to cover human shame) easily reduced to a mere practical clothing detail if not flagged. Mitigation: theologian review; explicit atonement-typology note.

10. Genesis 6:6 — gods_grief (High). Anthropopathic language must hold real relational divine sorrow together with God’s unchanging character; either extreme (denying real grief, or implying divine mutability) is a live translation risk. Mitigation: teaching note, not translation-level resolution.

11. Genesis 45:5-8; 50:20 — providence_in_suffering / god_meant_it_for_good (High). The Joseph narrative’s climactic providence claim risks collapsing into fatalism (denying the brothers’ real guilt) or into a denial of divine sovereignty. Mitigation: theologian note holding both truths; verbatim-consistent rendering of 50:20 across future documents.

12. Genesis 32:22-30 — israel_wrestles (High). The etymology of “Israel” risks a misreading of Jacob “defeating” or “overpowering” God rather than tenacious, dependent wrestling ending in blessing-through-weakness (the limp of v.25,31). Mitigation: theologian review; explicit note on the meaning of the outcome.

13. Genesis 24:12,14; 39:21; 47:29 — chesed_covenant_love (High). The newly coined करुणा rendering must be actively fenced against both अनुग्रह and दया or the distinct covenant-loyalty sense collapses into either saving grace or mere compassion. Mitigation: dedicated glossary note at first occurrence per document.

14. Genesis 9:20-27 — ham_canaan_curse (High). Documented history of racial/caste-hierarchy misuse of this text. Mitigation: mandatory anti-caste/anti-race disclaimer note attached to every teaching treatment.

15. Genesis 1:11-25 — kind_species / जाति (Medium, culturally amplified). जाति’s overwhelming secondary sense of social caste in everyday Hindi risks readers hearing a caste-classification statement about creation itself. Mitigation: clarifying note every occurrence; प्रकार as a lower-risk substitute where natural.

16. Genesis 37; 40-41 — dream_chalom (Medium). Given the prominence of dream-interpretation and astrology in Indian popular religion, dream-based revelation in the Joseph narrative risks being read as endorsing ongoing divinatory practice. Mitigation: teaching note restricting legitimacy to this specific historical special-revelation setting.

---

5. Full-Book Coverage Confirmation

This analysis surveyed all fifty chapters of Genesis for linguistic gaps and semantic-neighborhood collisions, consistent with the PRD’s full-book coverage mandate. Chapters generating no new gap-relevant vocabulary beyond terms already fenced elsewhere in this document are explicitly confirmed reviewed rather than silently omitted: 13, 20, 23, 27, 29–30, 33, 35, 36, 40, 46–47. Each of these chapters reuses covenant, promise, blessing, providence, or common-grace vocabulary already fenced above (see also the Chapter Coverage Index in 08_core_glossary.md, which this analysis directly informs).

---

This document must be read together with the baseline translation_memory.json, bible_term_registry.json, and doctrine_risk_registry.json, and precedes formal glossary compilation. All new fencing rules and coinages identified here (सामान्य कृपा, करुणा, the वंश/बीज fence, the पाप/अपराध-दोष/अशुद्ध fence, the स्वरूप+समानता pairing rule) must be carried forward into subsequent Phase 1 steps without modification.