Semantic Analysis

07 Semantic Analysis — 1 John (Full Book) in Koine Greek

English → Manipuri | Phase 1, Step 1

Methodology Note

This analysis follows the PRD Phase 1 Step 1 mandate: the core passage (1 John 4:7-21) receives verse-by-verse treatment of every load-bearing term; every other chapter of 1 John receives chapter-level treatment of its load-bearing theological vocabulary. Where a term is already recorded in the baseline Romans translation_memory.json / bible_term_registry.json, that exact Manipuri rendering is reused and is marked [BASELINE REUSE]. New terms required for 1 John are proposed here for the first time and must be added to translation memory before Phase 2 begins (per 12_ai_translation_requirements.md §“Translation Memory Load and Enforcement Instructions”). All risk tiers follow the Critical/High/Medium/Low definitions in the baseline doctrine_risk_registry.json.

1 John’s dominant vocabulary cluster — love (ἀγάπη), light (φῶς), abiding (μένω), being born of God (γεννάω), knowing (γινώσκω/οἶδα), and testing spirits (δοκιμάζω τὰ πνεύματα) — intersects heavily and specifically with both live Meitei religious systems: Gaudiya Vaishnavism’s bhakti-prema devotional framework (expressed through Ras Lila) and Sanamahism’s populated spirit-world (Umang Lai nature-deities, ancestral Apokpa spirits, maibi/maiba trance-mediation). 1 John is, in fact, unusually well-suited among New Testament books to directly engage a living animist practice, since 4:1-6 explicitly commands “testing the spirits” — a mandate that must be handled with theological precision rather than allowed to default to a generic anti-superstition polemic.

PART 1 — CORE PASSAGE: 1 John 4:7-21 (Verse by Verse)

4:7

Greek: Ἀγαπητοί, ἀγαπῶμεν ἀλλήλους, ὅτι ἡ ἀγάπη ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ ἐστιν, καὶ πᾶς ὁ ἀγαπῶν ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ γεγέννηται καὶ γινώσκει τὸν θεόν. Gloss: “Beloved, let us love one another, because love is from God, and everyone who loves has been born from God and knows God.”

ἀγάπη / ἀγαπάω (agapē / agapaō) — Literal: self-giving, willed love, not primarily emotional/erotic attraction. Semantic range: covenantal love (God→humanity), commanded love (believer→believer), the noun naming God’s own nature (v.8). English variants: love, charity (KJV). Contextual theological meaning: the defining, self-originating attribute and activity of God, made the ethical test of new birth. Manipuri: নুংশিবা (nungshiba). Risk: Critical. নুংশিবা is the ordinary Meitei word for love/affection and is the correct choice (not a borrowed devotional term), but it sits directly beside Manipuri Vaishnavism’s highly developed theology of prema — the passionate, often romanticized divine love between Krishna and Radha enacted in the UNESCO-recognized Ras Lila. Because 1 John’s thesis “God is love” (v.8) is the most quoted verse of the book, translators and teachers must explicitly distinguish ἀγάπη as self-giving, ethically-demanding, cross-shaped love (v.10) from prema as romantic/erotic devotional love. This distinction must be taught, not assumed.
γεννάω, perfect passive γεγέννηται (gennaō) — Literal: “has been fathered/born.” Semantic range: physical birth; here, spiritual regeneration — a completed, abiding new-birth status (perfect tense = past act, present standing). English variants: born, begotten, born of God. Contextual meaning: love for fellow believers is presented as evidence of an already-accomplished spiritual birth, not a means of achieving it. Manipuri: তেংবাং মপুদগী পোকপা (Tengban Mapudagi pokpa), lit. “born from God.” Risk: Critical. Must be sharply distinguished from পুনর্জন্ম (rebirth/reincarnation), the term already forbidden in the baseline package for resurrection because it names Vaishnava cyclical-rebirth doctrine. New birth in 1 John is a one-time, non-repeatable, non-cyclical spiritual event, categorically different from any samsaric rebirth framework.
γινώσκω (ginōskō) — Literal: to know by experience/relationship (contrasted with mere intellectual assertion). Semantic range: relational, progressive, experiential knowledge, John’s favored verb for knowing God. English variants: know, understand, perceive. Contextual meaning: love for others is proof of a real, ongoing relational knowledge of God, not merely correct doctrine (a direct polemic against the opponents’ claim to superior gnosis). Manipuri: খংবা (khangba). Risk: Medium. Greek distinguishes γινώσκω (relational/experiential) from οἶδα (settled/factual knowledge, also frequent in 1 John, e.g. 2:20-21, 3:2, 5:13); Manipuri খংবা does not carry this distinction natively. Recommend a translator’s note wherever the distinction is doctrinally load-bearing (e.g., 2:3-4’s “we know him” vs. “knows him not”).

4:8

Greek: ὁ μὴ ἀγαπῶν οὐκ ἔγνω τὸν θεόν, ὅτι ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν. Gloss: “The one not loving has not known God, because God is love.”

ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν (“God is love”) — This is a predicate-noun statement of God’s essential nature, parallel in form and weight to 1:5’s “God is light.” Manipuri God-term reuse [BASELINE REUSE]: তেংবাং মপু. Risk: Critical. This is one of the two defining ontological statements of 1 John (with 1:5) and must never be rendered in a way that implies love is merely one attribute alongside others, nor in a way that could be reheard through the bhakti lens as “God is (the object/source of) prema” — i.e., collapsed into the devotional economy of bhakti rather than stated as God’s own self-giving essence prior to and independent of any devotee’s response.

4:9

Greek: ἐν τούτῳ ἐφανερώθη ἡ ἀγάπη τοῦ θεοῦ ἐν ἡμῖν, ὅτι τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ τὸν μονογενῆ ἀπέσταλκεν ὁ θεὸς εἰς τὸν κόσμον ἵνα ζήσωμεν διʼ αὐτοῦ. Gloss: “In this the love of God was manifested among us, that God sent his only Son into the world, that we might live through him.”

φανερόω (phaneroō) — Literal: to make visible/manifest what was hidden. Semantic range: revelation, disclosure, historical appearing. English variants: manifested, revealed, appeared. Contextual meaning: God’s love is not abstract but was historically, visibly demonstrated in a concrete event (the sending of the Son). Manipuri: ফোংদোকপা (phongdokpa) — reusing the verbal root already established for “declare/manifest” in the baseline prophet term (তোঙান তোঙানবা ফোংদোকপা). Risk: Medium. Must convey a definitive historical disclosure, not an ongoing mystical self-revelation of the type a maibi might claim during Lai Haraoba trance.
υἱὸν… τὸν μονογενῆ (monogenēs) — Literal: “only one of its kind,” “one-and-only.” Semantic range: uniqueness of origin/kind, not merely “firstborn” among many. English variants: only begotten, one and only, only Son. Contextual meaning: builds on baseline’s Son of God / Sonship of Christ doctrine, but adds the specific point of uniqueness — there is no other of this kind. Manipuri: অমা খক্তবা মচানুপা (ama khaktaba machanupa), lit. “the one-and-only son,” built on baseline’s তেংবাং মপুগী মচানুপা (Son of God) [BASELINE REUSE of root term]. Risk: Critical. This is the single most important term for directly confronting avatar theology: Krishna is understood within Manipuri Vaishnavism as one avatar within a recognized sequence of Vishnu’s descents. μονογενής asserts the opposite — there is no sequence, no other, no second. This must be taught explicitly against, not left to be inferred from, the “Son of God” phrase alone.
κόσμος (kosmos) — Literal: the ordered world/universe. Semantic range in John’s writings: (1) the created world as object of God’s love (this verse); (2) the fallen, God-opposed moral-spiritual system (2:15-17, 4:4-5, 5:19). English variants: world, earth, humanity, the world-system. Manipuri: মালেম (malem). Risk: High. Context must always specify which sense of κόσμος is active; see Chapter 2 and Chapter 5 notes below for the “world-system” sense, which carries the greater risk of collision with a nature-honoring reading of the physical world tied to Umang Lai sacred-grove reverence.

4:10

Greek: ἐν τούτῳ ἐστὶν ἡ ἀγάπη, οὐχ ὅτι ἡμεῖς ἠγαπήσαμεν τὸν θεόν, ἀλλʼ ὅτι αὐτὸς ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς καὶ ἀπέστειλεν τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ ἱλασμὸν περὶ τῶν ἁμαρτιῶν ἡμῶν. Gloss: “In this is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as a propitiation concerning our sins.”

ἱλασμός (hilasmos) — Literal: “means of appeasement/propitiation.” Semantic range: a sacrifice that satisfies/turns away deserved judgment and thereby makes reconciliation possible; the same word appears already at 2:2. English variants: propitiation, atoning sacrifice, sin offering. Contextual meaning: the Son’s death is presented as God’s own initiative to satisfy the just consequence of sin — the crucial point being that God himself provides and initiates the propitiation; humanity does not perform it toward God. Manipuri (NEW TERM): পাপ কোকহনবগী বলি (pap kokhanbagi bali), lit. “the sacrifice that causes sin to be removed/turned away.” Risk: Critical. This is a genuinely dangerous term for a Meitei audience for two independent reasons: (1) বলি (sacrifice/offering) is the standard word for ritual sacrifice/offering within regional Vaishnava temple practice (naivedya/bali offerings to a murti) and is also the term for animal and food offerings made to the Umang Lai forest deities during Lai Haraoba to secure their favor or avert their displeasure; (2) both of these existing practices are fundamentally human-initiated appeasement of a deity/spirit whose favor is uncertain. 1 John 4:10’s entire rhetorical point is the reverse: God initiates and supplies the propitiation himself, before and apart from any human appeasement ritual. This inversion — appeasement flowing from God to humanity, not humanity to God — must be explicitly taught every time this term occurs (2:2; 4:10).
ἁμαρτία (hamartia) — [BASELINE REUSE] পাপ (pap). No new risk beyond baseline note (must be distinguished from ritual offense addressed through Lai Haraoba purification or Vaishnava prayaschitta).

4:11

Greek: Ἀγαπητοί, εἰ οὕτως ὁ θεὸς ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς, καὶ ἡμεῖς ὀφείλομεν ἀλλήλους ἀγαπᾶν. Gloss: “Beloved, if God so loved us, we also ought to love one another.”

ὀφείλομεν (opheilomen, “we ought/owe”) — Minor term; conveys moral debt/obligation flowing from having received love, not law-keeping for merit. Manipuri: ফাওরি (phaori, “must/ought”) — descriptive, Low risk, no baseline conflict.
ἀγαπᾶν — see 4:7 entry [reuse].

4:12

Greek: θεὸν οὐδεὶς πώποτε τεθέαται· ἐὰν ἀγαπῶμεν ἀλλήλους, ὁ θεὸς ἐν ἡμῖν μένει καὶ ἡ ἀγάπη αὐτοῦ ἐν ἡμῖν τετελειωμένη ἐστίν. Gloss: “No one has ever seen God; if we love one another, God abides in us and his love is perfected in us.”

μένω (menō) — Literal: to remain, stay, dwell, continue. Semantic range: John’s signature term for mutual, continuous, relational indwelling between God/Christ and the believer (also 2:6,10,14,17,19,24,27,28; 3:6,9,14,17,24; 4:13,15,16). English variants: abide, remain, dwell, continue in. Contextual meaning: not a single event but an ongoing, reciprocal communion — God dwelling in the believer and the believer dwelling in God. Manipuri (NEW TERM): লৈরকপা (leiraba), “to remain/continue dwelling.” Risk: Critical. This is one of the highest-collision terms in the entire book. Two distinct existing Meitei categories are available for “a spirit dwelling within/among people,” and both must be explicitly ruled out: (1) Sanamahi is understood in indigenous belief as residing within the household hearth/shrine — a spatial, structural indwelling tied to a physical dwelling; (2) a maibi is understood to be temporarily entered or possessed by an Umang Lai deity during Lai Haraoba trance — an ecstatic, involuntary, episodic possession. The Holy Spirit’s/God’s abiding in the believer (see also 4:13) is neither of these: it is continuous (not episodic), relational and moral (grounded in love and truth, not ritual or trance), and voluntary/covenantal (not possession). This distinction must be taught explicitly wherever μένω describes divine indwelling.
τελειόω, perfect passive τετελειωμένη (teleioō) — Literal: to bring to completion/maturity, not “flawlessness” in an abstract sense. Semantic range: progressive completion of a process toward its intended goal. English variants: perfected, made complete, matured. Contextual meaning: love reaches its intended, mature expression through being practiced toward others. Manipuri (NEW TERM): মপুং ফাবা (mapung phaba), lit. “reaching full measure” — reusing the root already used in baseline’s effectual-calling doctrine name (মপুং ফাবা কৌবা). Risk: High. Must be taught as the Spirit’s ongoing relational work of maturing love in the believer, not a ritual-purity completion status (as in preparation before Lai Haraoba or temple worship) nor an esoteric spiritual-attainment stage (a siddha-like perfected state) within bhakti or yogic frameworks.
θεάομαι, τεθέαται (“has seen”) — Minor eyewitness-testimony term, echoing 1:1-3; note but no separate risk entry needed.

4:13

Greek: ἐν τούτῳ γινώσκομεν ὅτι ἐν αὐτῷ μένομεν καὶ αὐτὸς ἐν ἡμῖν, ὅτι ἐκ τοῦ πνεύματος αὐτοῦ δέδωκεν ἡμῖν. Gloss: “By this we know that we abide in him and he in us, because he has given us of his Spirit.”

πνεῦμα (pneuma), here = the Holy Spirit — [BASELINE REUSE] থাওয়াই অসেংবা (Thawai Asengba), in full, per baseline’s Critical rule that bare থাওয়াই must never stand alone for the Holy Spirit. Risk: Critical (unchanged from baseline). Important cross-reference to 4:1 below: in 4:1 the same word πνεῦμα is used for unspecified spirits being tested, some of which are explicitly false — there, bare থাওয়াই is contextually correct and should NOT be expanded to থাওয়াই অসেংবা. Phase 2 translators must apply this distinction verse-by-verse within chapter 4, not mechanically.
μένομεν — see 4:12 [reuse].

4:14

Greek: καὶ ἡμεῖς τεθεάμεθα καὶ μαρτυροῦμεν ὅτι ὁ πατὴρ ἀπέσταλκεν τὸν υἱὸν σωτῆρα τοῦ κόσμου. Gloss: “And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent the Son as Savior of the world.”

μαρτυρέω (martyreō) — Literal: to bear witness/testify, typically from direct knowledge. Semantic range: legal/eyewitness testimony language, prominent again in 5:6-11. English variants: testify, witness, bear witness. Manipuri (NEW TERM): সাক্ষী পীবা (sakshi piba), “to give testimony,” building on the widely used regional loan সাক্ষী (witness). Risk: Medium. Must convey authoritative eyewitness/apostolic testimony to a historical event (the sending of the Son), not the oracular “testimony” claimed by a maibi speaking from trance.
πατήρ (Father) — [BASELINE REUSE] ইপা (Ipa).
σωτήρ (sōtēr, “Savior”) — Literal: rescuer/deliverer. Semantic range: one who saves from mortal danger; in the LXX/NT, God’s/Messiah’s title as deliverer from sin’s ultimate consequence. English variants: Savior, deliverer, rescuer. Manipuri (NEW TERM): অহানবিরকপা (ahanbirakpa), “the one who rescues/saves,” built directly on baseline’s অহানবা (salvation). Risk: High. Must not be conflated with any Vaishnava savior-figure who delivers a devotee toward মোক্ষ (liberation) or toward eternal nearness to Krishna in Vaikuntha/Goloka — the same Critical distinction baseline’s “salvation” entry already establishes must be carried into this noun form as well.
κόσμου — see 4:9 [reuse]; here in the more neutral “world of humanity as object of rescue” sense.

4:15

Greek: ὃς ἂν ὁμολογήσῃ ὅτι Ἰησοῦς ἐστιν ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ, ὁ θεὸς ἐν αὐτῷ μένει καὶ αὐτὸς ἐν τῷ θεῷ. Gloss: “Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him and he in God.”

ὁμολογέω (homologeō) — Literal: “to say the same thing,” i.e., to agree with and openly affirm. Semantic range: public, verbal acknowledgment/agreement with a stated truth; used in 1 John both for confessing sin (1:9) and confessing Christ’s identity (2:23; 4:2-3,15). English variants: confess, acknowledge, declare. Manipuri (NEW TERM): ফোংনা হায়বা (phongna haiba), “to say/declare openly.” Risk: Critical in this specific Christological use (confessing Jesus as Son of God — directly tied to Sonship/Deity of Christ doctrine, already Critical in baseline); High in the sin-confession use at 1:9 (see Chapter 1 below). Distinct from ফোংদোকপা (manifest/reveal, used of God’s own self-disclosure) — confession here is the human verbal response to what God has manifested.
Ἰησοῦς … ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ — [BASELINE REUSE] জিসু / তেংবাং মপুগী মচানুপা.
μένει — see 4:12 [reuse].

4:16

Greek: καὶ ἡμεῖς ἐγνώκαμεν καὶ πεπιστεύκαμεν τὴν ἀγάπην ἣν ἔχει ὁ θεὸς ἐν ἡμῖν. ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν, καὶ ὁ μένων ἐν τῇ ἀγάπῃ ἐν τῷ θεῷ μένει καὶ ὁ θεὸς ἐν αὐτῷ μένει. Gloss: “And we have known and believed the love which God has in/toward us. God is love, and the one abiding in love abides in God, and God abides in him.”

πιστεύω (pisteuō) — [BASELINE REUSE] root of থাজবা (faith/belief); note the pairing here of “known” (ἐγνώκαμεν) and “believed” (πεπιστεύκαμεν) as parallel, mutually reinforcing verbs — a useful teaching point that biblical faith is not opposed to knowledge.
ὁ θεὸς ἀγάπη ἐστίν — repetition of v.8; reinforces Critical status.
ὁ μένων ἐν τῇ ἀγάπῃ — “the one abiding in love”: love itself becomes the “location” of mutual abiding; a distinctively Johannine idiom requiring careful, non-literal rendering in Manipuri so as not to suggest love is a physical or ritual space (paralleling a shrine or grove).

4:17

Greek: ἐν τούτῳ τετελείωται ἡ ἀγάπη μεθʼ ἡμῶν, ἵνα παρρησίαν ἔχωμεν ἐν τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῆς κρίσεως, ὅτι καθὼς ἐκεῖνός ἐστιν καὶ ἡμεῖς ἐσμὲν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ τούτῳ. Gloss: “In this love has been perfected with us, that we may have confidence in the day of judgment, because as he is, so are we in this world.”

παρρησία (parrēsia) — Literal: freedom/boldness of speech, originally a civic-political term for a citizen’s right to speak openly. Semantic range: confident boldness, especially before a superior or in a courtroom-like setting; John uses it for approaching God in prayer (3:21; 5:14) and for confidence at final judgment (2:28; 4:17). English variants: confidence, boldness, assurance. Manipuri (NEW TERM): চিংনবা লৈতবা (chingnaba leitaba), lit. “having no fear,” i.e., confident boldness. Risk: High. Ties directly to the Assurance of Salvation doctrine. Must be distinguished from (a) a false presumption unconnected to Christ’s finished work, and (b) any sense of ritual boldness earned by successfully placating the Umang Lai or by accumulated bhakti-devotional merit — this confidence rests entirely on being “as he is” (Christ’s own standing), not on the believer’s ritual or devotional performance.
κρίσις (krisis, “judgment”) — Minor term; “day of judgment” (ἡμέρα τῆς κρίσεως), the eschatological assize. Manipuri: ৱার য়াদবগী নুমিৎ (war yadabagi numit), “day of judging/verdict.” Risk: Medium — must be kept as a personal, moral, forensic day of reckoning before God, not conflated with impersonal fate.
κόσμῳ τούτῳ — see 4:9 [reuse].

4:18

Greek: φόβος οὐκ ἔστιν ἐν τῇ ἀγάπῃ, ἀλλʼ ἡ τελεία ἀγάπη ἔξω βάλλει τὸν φόβον, ὅτι ὁ φόβος κόλασιν ἔχει· ὁ δὲ φοβούμενος οὐ τετελείωται ἐν τῇ ἀγάπῃ. Gloss: “Fear is not in love, but perfect love casts out fear, because fear has punishment; the one fearing has not been perfected in love.”

φόβος (phobos, “fear”) — Ordinary word for fear/dread, here specifically fear of God’s judgment/punishment as opposed to loving trust. Manipuri: কিবা (kiba). Risk: Low-Medium. Contextual note: this is not a blanket rejection of all reverent “fear of the Lord” language found elsewhere in Scripture, but specifically the dread of condemnation that mature love displaces; a brief translator’s note is advisable to prevent contradiction with “fear of the LORD” wisdom-tradition language elsewhere.
τελεία ἀγάπη (“perfect/mature love”) — see 4:12 τελειόω entry [reuse]; here as adjective modifying love directly.
κόλασις (kolasis, “punishment/torment”) — Literal: penal correction/torment. English variants: punishment, torment, chastisement. Manipuri (NEW TERM): ৱাকৎপা (wakatpa), “torment/suffering.” Risk: Low. Minor collision risk only insofar as it could be misheard as this-worldly misfortune sent by an offended Umang Lai spirit rather than eschatological judgment; a brief contextual note suffices.
ἔξω βάλλει (“casts out”) — Descriptive verb phrase; Manipuri: থোকহনবা (thokhanba), “to drive/expel.” Risk: Medium. Worth noting the incidental resonance with exorcism/spirit-expulsion language familiar from Sanamahi ritual practice (expelling a troublesome spirit); here it is fear, not a spirit-being, that is expelled — a clarifying note is useful but the doctrinal content is not actually at risk.

4:19

Greek: ἡμεῖς ἀγαπῶμεν, ὅτι αὐτὸς πρῶτος ἠγάπησεν ἡμᾶς. Gloss: “We love, because he first loved us.”

πρῶτος (“first”) — Minor but theologically weighty: establishes the strict priority of divine initiative over human response — love is never self-generated toward God first. No separate glossary entry needed beyond noting this priority-of-grace emphasis, which parallels baseline’s Grace doctrine note (Romans 4:4-5, 11:5-6) about unconditioned initiative versus bhakti-responsive favor. Cross-reference: High relevance to Grace/Love distinction from bhakti’s কৃপা.

4:20

Greek: ἐάν τις εἴπῃ ὅτι Ἀγαπῶ τὸν θεόν, καὶ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ μισῇ, ψεύστης ἐστίν· ὁ γὰρ μὴ ἀγαπῶν τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ ὃν ἑώρακεν, τὸν θεὸν ὃν οὐχ ἑώρακεν οὐ δύναται ἀγαπᾶν. Gloss: “If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ and hates his brother, he is a liar; for the one not loving his brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen.”

ἀδελφός (adelphos, “brother”) — Literal: sibling; in 1 John, a fellow believer within the church community. Semantic range: extends beyond biological/clan kinship to spiritual family. English variants: brother, fellow believer, brethren. Manipuri (NEW TERM): থাজবা ঈচিন-ঈনাও (thajaba ichin-inao), lit. “believing siblings,” built on the ordinary Meitei kinship term ঈচিন-ঈনাও. Risk: High. This term is central to the curriculum’s named doctrine “Love for the Brethren as Evidence of New Birth” and requires careful handling because traditional Meitei identity runs strongly through clan (yumnak) lineage and biological kinship; the church as a new, faith-based sibling-family (crossing yumnak and, by extension, contemporary inter-community lines) must be taught explicitly, echoing the same tension already flagged in baseline’s Adoption and Christian Identity in Christ doctrines.
μισέω (miseō, “hate”) — Direct antonym of ἀγαπάω. Manipuri: ৎহেংবা (thengba, “to hate/despise”) — Low risk, standard vocabulary.
ψεύστης (pseustēs, “liar”) — Someone who speaks falsehood; used polemically against false claims of love/knowledge of God throughout 1 John (1:10; 2:4,22; 4:20; 5:10). Manipuri: লৌমী (loumi) or অতৈ ৱা হায়বা (atai wa haiba, “one who speaks falsehood”) — Risk: Medium. Ties to the book’s repeated test-by-consistency logic (claims must match observable love/obedience).

4:21

Greek: καὶ ταύτην τὴν ἐντολὴν ἔχομεν ἀπʼ αὐτοῦ, ἵνα ὁ ἀγαπῶν τὸν θεὸν ἀγαπᾷ καὶ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ. Gloss: “And this commandment we have from him, that the one loving God should also love his brother.”

ἐντολή (entolē, “commandment”) — Literal: an authoritative charge/instruction. Semantic range: in John’s writings, especially “the new commandment” to love (2:7-11) and the combined commandment to believe in Christ and love one another (3:23). English variants: commandment, command, instruction. Manipuri (NEW TERM, context-sensitive with baseline term): য়াথাং (yathang) — reusing baseline’s Mosaic-Law term. Risk: Medium. Baseline reserves য়াথাং for Torah/Mosaic Law and explicitly warns against the Hindu-derived ধর্ম sense; using the same word for John’s ἐντολή is defensible (both denote authoritative divine command) but risks importing an Old-Covenant-law flavor into what is specifically Christ’s relational, love-defining command. Recommend a Phase 2 translator’s note distinguishing “the commandment to love” from “the Law of Moses” wherever ἐντολή occurs, or consider a distinct compound (e.g., “ক্রিস্তোগী য়াথাং,” “Christ’s command”) if native-speaker review finds the reuse unclear.

PART 2 — CHAPTER-BY-CHAPTER ANALYSIS OF THE WHOLE BOOK

Chapter 1 (1:1-10) — Eyewitness Testimony, Fellowship, Light/Darkness, Confession

λόγος τῆς ζωῆς (logos tēs zōēs, “the Word of life”) — 1:1. Literal: the living Word; echoes John 1:1’s Logos, directly relevant to baseline’s Incarnation entry (the eternal Word/Son taking on flesh, “which we have heard, seen, looked upon, and touched”). Manipuri (NEW TERM): ৱাহেই (wahei, “word/message”) combined as হিংবগী ৱাহেই (hingbagi wahei). Risk: High. Must reinforce, not compete with, baseline’s Incarnation term মীওইগী মহৈ লৌবা — the eyewitness, tactile emphasis (“heard… seen… touched”) is 1 John’s own strongest anti-docetic argument and should be preserved with full physical concreteness in translation.
φανερόω — 1:2, “the life was manifested” — [reuse from Core Passage 4:9 entry].
κοινωνία (koinōnia, “fellowship”) — 1:3,6,7. [BASELINE REUSE] লোইনবা (loinaba). Risk note (elevated for this curriculum): High, not Low as in the baseline Romans registry — 1 John names “Fellowship with God and One Another” as a core doctrine (not an incidental term), and κοινωνία μετὰ τοῦ πατρός (“fellowship with the Father,” 1:3) directly overlaps both Vaishnava bhakti’s aspiration to intimate communion with Krishna and Sanamahi’s ritual communion with the Umang Lai maintained through Lai Haraoba participation. Same Manipuri term is retained per the hard reuse rule, but its risk tier and required teaching depth should be elevated for this curriculum.
φῶς (phōs, “light”) / σκοτία (skotia, “darkness”) — 1:5-7; recurs 2:8-11. Literal: physical light/darkness; here, moral-spiritual metaphor for God’s holy nature versus sin/ignorance. Parallel ontological statement to “God is love” (4:8,16): “God is light, and in him is no darkness at all” (1:5). Manipuri (NEW TERMS): মংঙাল (mangngal, light) / অমুক (amuk, darkness). Risk: High (light) / Medium (darkness). Light-of-God metaphors must be kept distinct from the ceremonial visual splendor of Ras Lila staging (explicitly designed to evoke Krishna’s own divine radiance for worshippers), a collision already flagged in baseline’s “glory” (দোক্ষা/মতিক চাউবা) entry — the same caution applies here with even more force, since “God is light” is a foundational ontological claim, not incidental imagery.
περιπατέω (peripateō, “walk”) — 1:6-7. Idiomatic for habitual moral conduct. Manipuri: চৎনবা (chatnaba), reusing the etymological root already embedded in baseline’s righteousness compound (অচুম্বা চৎনবিরাক). Risk: Low. Good natural reuse; no new risk.
αἷμα (haima, “blood”) — 1:7, “the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us.” Manipuri (NEW TERM): ঈ (i). Risk: Medium. Christ’s blood as the unique, once-for-all basis of cleansing must be distinguished from the sacrificial/ritual blood-offering logic of Umang Lai propitiation offerings (see also ἱλασμός, Core Passage 4:10) — cross-reference required.
ἁμαρτία (hamartia, “sin”) — 1:7-10. [BASELINE REUSE] পাপ.
ὁμολογέω (homologeō, “confess”) — sin-confession use — 1:9, “If we confess our sins…” [reuse of Core Passage 4:15 term] ফোংনা হায়বা. Risk: High in this use (distinct from the Critical Christological-confession use at 4:15) — this is the doctrinal anchor of “Confession and Forgiveness of Sin” and must convey a genuine, specific acknowledgment of sin to God, not a generalized ritual purification declaration.
ἀφίημι (aphiēmi, “forgive”) — 1:9, “he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins.” Manipuri (NEW TERM, drawing on baseline precedent): ময়ামদা কোকপা (mayamda kokpa) — the baseline Romans package already names this exact phrase as the term for “forgiveness alone” when explicitly distinguishing it from the fuller doctrine of justification (অচুম্বা ওইহনবা). 1 John’s doctrine of forgiveness legitimately uses this narrower term as its primary category (1 John does not use δικαίωσις/justification vocabulary). Risk: High. Must be taught alongside καθαρίζω (cleanse, following) as a paired promise — forgiveness of the debt and cleansing of the defilement — both grounded in God’s own faithfulness and justice, not in successful ritual performance.
καθαρίζω (katharizō, “cleanse”) — 1:9, “and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” Manipuri (NEW TERM): পাপদগী শেংহনবা (papdagi shenghanba), “to cause to become clean from sin.” Risk: High. Baseline explicitly reserves the শেং- root for physical/ritual cleanliness (contrasted with অসেংবা for moral holiness); 1 John 1:9’s cleansing is moral and complete, accomplished once through Christ’s blood, not an ongoing ritual purification comparable to preparatory washing before Lai Haraoba or temple worship. This tension between the baseline’s শেং-root convention and 1 John’s specific verb should be flagged for theologian review and may warrant a distinct compound if native-speaker testing shows confusion (e.g., preferring অসেংহনবা-family vocabulary instead).
ἀδικία (adikia, “unrighteousness”) — 1:9, minor; direct antonym of δικαιοσύνη. Manipuri: অচুম্বা নত্তবা (achumba nattaba), “not-righteousness,” built directly on baseline’s righteousness term. Risk: Low.

Chapter 2 (2:1-29) — Advocate, Propitiation, Commandment, Antichrist, Anointing, Abiding

παράκλητος (paraklētos, “advocate”) — 2:1, “we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.” Literal: one called alongside to help, especially in a legal setting (defense counsel, intercessor). English variants: advocate, comforter, helper, intercessor (the same Greek word is used of the Holy Spirit in John’s Gospel). Manipuri (NEW TERM): ৱার শাংদোকপিবা (war shangdokpiba), “one who pleads a case on another’s behalf.” Risk: Critical. Christ’s unique, exclusive advocacy before the Father must not be confused with any other mediating figure familiar to a Meitei audience — most notably the maiba/maibi’s recognized ritual role as intermediary between a community and the Umang Lai or ancestral spirits. Christ’s advocacy is not a ritual office performed by a human specialist but the risen, glorified Son’s own perpetual intercession, grounded in his own righteousness (δίκαιος — [BASELINE REUSE] root অচুম্বা).
ἱλασμός — 2:2, first occurrence of the term treated fully at Core Passage 4:10 above; the doctrine note there applies equally here, with the added note that 2:2 explicitly extends the propitiation’s scope (“not for ours only, but also for the whole world” — κόσμος), directly relevant to Universal Scope of the Gospel (already Critical in baseline).
ἐντολή (entolē, “commandment”) — 2:3-11; first heavy usage of the term treated at Core Passage 4:21 above; note especially the “new commandment” (καινὴ ἐντολή, 2:7-8) framing, which should be taught as new in manner of fulfillment (as Christ loved) rather than new in content (love was already commanded in the Old Testament).
κόσμος — “world-system” sense — 2:15-17, “Do not love the world or the things in the world… the world is passing away.” This is the negative, God-opposed-system sense flagged in the Core Passage 4:9 entry. Risk: High. Must be clearly taught as a moral-spiritual system opposed to God’s will, not the created physical world (which 1 John elsewhere treats as the object of God’s saving love, 4:9) nor a rejection of the natural world honored through Umang Lai sacred-grove reverence.
ἐπιθυμία (epithymia, “desire/lust”) — 2:16, minor. Manipuri: ওয়ানবা (wanaba, “craving/desire”). Risk: Low-Medium.
ἀλαζονεία (alazoneia, “pride/boastfulness”) — 2:16, minor. Manipuri: চাউথोकपा (chauthokpa, “boastfulness”). Risk: Low.
ἀντίχριστος (antichristos, “antichrist”) — 2:18,22 (also 4:3; 2 John 7). Literal: “against/instead-of Christ.” Semantic range: both a specific future eschatological figure and, in 1 John’s present-tense usage, any teacher/spirit that denies Christ’s true identity (specifically, per 2:22 and 4:2-3, denial that Jesus is the Christ and denial that he has come in the flesh). English variants: antichrist. Manipuri (NEW TERM): এন্টিক্রিস্তো (Antikristo), transliterated following the established pattern for ক্রিস্তো (Christo). Risk: Critical. This term names the curriculum’s own doctrine “The Incarnation and Antichrist” and must not be flattened into a generic “evil supernatural figure” comparable to a malevolent Umang Lai spirit or a demonic figure (asura) from Vaishnava mythology. Its precise biblical content is Christological denial — specifically, denying the incarnation (see next entry) and Jesus’s identity as the Christ — not moral evil or supernatural menace in general. This precision must be taught explicitly.
ἀρνέομαι (arneomai, “deny”) — 2:22-23, “who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ… whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either.” Manipuri (NEW TERM): থিনবা (thinba). Risk: High. Directly tied to Sonship/Deity of Christ doctrine (already Critical in baseline); the logic that denying the Son forfeits the Father is a distinctive Johannine argument that must be preserved precisely.
χρῖσμα (chrisma, “anointing”) — 2:20,27, “you have an anointing from the Holy One… his anointing teaches you concerning all things.” Literal: an anointing (with oil), by extension the endowment/enablement it symbolizes. English variants: anointing, unction. Manipuri (NEW TERM): থাওয়াই অসেংবাগী থৌনবা (Thawai Asengbagi thounaba), “the Holy Spirit’s anointing,” built on baseline’s Holy Spirit term. Risk: High. Alternative explicitly rejected: অভিষেক (abhishek) — the standard regional Sanskrit-derived term for ritual anointing/consecration, most prominently used for the ceremonial anointing/bathing of a Vaishnava temple murti with milk, oil, and other substances. Using অভিষেক here would strongly suggest the Spirit’s teaching ministry is a temple-consecration ritual performed on believers rather than the Spirit’s own indwelling instructional work; থৌনবা (a more generic Meitei word for anointing/smearing with oil) is preferred, but this choice should be confirmed with a Manipuri-speaking theologian given how strong the অভিষেক association is likely to be.
μένω — 2:6,10,14,17,19,24,27,28; this chapter contains the book’s first heavy concentration of the abiding/indwelling vocabulary treated fully at Core Passage 4:12 above. [reuse] লৈরকপা. The Critical risk note there (distinguishing from Sanamahi household-deity residency and maibi trance-possession) applies with equal force throughout this chapter.
παρρησία — 2:28, first occurrence, treated fully at Core Passage 4:17. [reuse].
γεννάω, “born of him” — 2:29, first occurrence of the new-birth vocabulary treated fully at Core Passage 4:7. [reuse] তেংবাং মপুদগী পোকপা.

Chapter 3 (3:1-24) — Children of God, Lawlessness, the Devil, Brotherly Love, Confidence

τέκνα θεοῦ (tekna theou, “children of God”) — 3:1-2,10. Distinct from υἱός (Son, reserved in this analysis for Christ’s unique Sonship); τέκνον is the ordinary word for “child,” used of believers’ family status. Manipuri (NEW TERM, built on baseline root): তেংবাং মপুগী মচা (Tengban Mapugi macha), reusing মচা (“child”) from baseline’s Adoption entry (মচা ওইনা লৌবা). Risk: High. Cross-reference baseline’s Adoption doctrine note in full: formal legal adoption/full inheritance-rights sonship is not a settled category in traditional Meitei yumnak (clan) kinship, where inheritance runs through birth lineage; this must be taught explicitly here as well, not assumed to transfer automatically from the Romans curriculum.
ἁγνίζω (hagnizō, “purify”) — 3:3, “everyone who has this hope purifies himself.” Minor; builds on the অসেংবা (holy) word-family. Manipuri: অসেংহনবা (asenghanba, “to make oneself holy/pure”). Risk: Medium. Note: this self-purification is responsive (motivated by hope of Christ’s return), not the ritual precondition-purification undertaken before Lai Haraoba or temple worship — a distinction worth a brief note though the term itself is low-collision.
ἀνομία (anomia, “lawlessness”) — 3:4, “sin is lawlessness.” Manipuri (NEW TERM): য়াথাং য়াদবা (yathang yadaba), “transgression/violation of law,” built on baseline’s Law term. Risk: Medium. Defines sin relationally against God’s revealed will (য়াথাং), not against an impersonal cosmic order (ধর্ম) — reinforces baseline’s explicit rejection of ধর্ম vocabulary for law-related terms.
διάβολος (diabolos, “devil”) / σπέρμα (sperma, “seed”) — 3:8-10, “the one who sins is of the devil… for this purpose the Son of God was manifested, to destroy the works of the devil.” Manipuri (NEW TERM): সয়তান (Saitan), transliterated. Risk: High. Must be taught as a specific, personal, morally responsible, and already-defeated enemy of God — not one troublesome spirit among the populated Meitei spirit-world (an Umang Lai malevolent nature-spirit or a wandering ancestral spirit) that might be ritually placated or negotiated with. The devil in 1 John is opposed, not managed.
ἀνθρωποκτόνος (anthrōpoktonos, “murderer”), Κάϊν (Cain) — 3:12,15; minor narrative/typological reference requiring Old Testament background teaching (cf. baseline’s low OT-literacy assumption); no separate glossary risk beyond note that “Cain” as a name should follow standard Manipuri Bible transliteration.
ἀδελφός (adelphos, “brother”) — 3:10 onward (first heavy occurrence); treated fully at Core Passage 4:20. [reuse] থাজবা ঈচিন-ঈনাও.
τίθημι τὴν ψυχήν (tithēmi tēn psychēn, “lay down [one’s] life”) — 3:16, “he laid down his life for us, and we ought to lay down our lives for the brothers.” Descriptive phrase modeling sacrificial love on Christ’s own death; Manipuri: থাওয়াই পীথোকপা (thawai pithokpa) or descriptive হিংবা পীথোকপা (hingba pithokpa, “to give up one’s life”). Risk: Medium. Should be rendered to avoid any accidental echo of ritual self-offering/self-mortification practice; the emphasis is substitutionary, sacrificial love for others, modeled directly on Christ.
σπλάγχνα (splagchna, “compassion,” lit. “inward parts/bowels”) — 3:17; Manipuri idiom needed (Manipuri, like many languages, may locate compassion in the “liver” or “heart” rather than “bowels” — a natural-equivalent idiom should be used, e.g., থমোইদা নুংঙাইতबा, “compassion in the heart/mind”). Risk: Low.
καρδία (kardia, “heart”) — 3:19-21; ordinary term for the seat of conscience/moral awareness. Manipuri: থমোই (thamoi) or পুক্নিং (pukning). Risk: Low.
καταγινώσκω (kataginōskō, “condemn”) — 3:20-21; minor, related to κρίσις/judgment vocabulary (Core Passage 4:17). Manipuri: ৱার য়াবা (war yaba, “to pass verdict against”). Risk: Low-Medium.
παρρησία — 3:21; [reuse], here specifically boldness in prayer.
πνεῦμα — 3:24, “by the Spirit whom he has given us”; [BASELINE REUSE, Holy Spirit sense] থাওয়াই অসেংবা.

Chapter 4:1-6 (outside the core passage) — Testing the Spirits, Confessing the Incarnation, Overcoming

δοκιμάζετε τὰ πνεύματα (dokimazete ta pneumata, “test the spirits”) — 4:1. Literal: “test/examine the spirits [to see] whether they are from God.” Semantic range: discernment/verification, often used of testing metals or examining goods for authenticity. English variants: test, try, examine, discern. Manipuri (NEW TERM): থাওয়াইশিং চেকশিন য়েংবা (thawaishing chekshin yengba), “to carefully examine the spirits.” Risk: Critical. This is doctrinally the single most direct engagement point in all of 1 John with a live Meitei religious practice: 1 John here explicitly commands believers to test — not automatically trust or automatically dismiss — claims of spiritual origin. This gives direct, biblically-grounded footing for evaluating claims made for maibi trance-possession experiences during Lai Haraoba and other spirit-attributed phenomena, without needing to import an external framework. The test given (4:2-3) is specifically Christological, not experiential or moral — this must be the emphasis.
πνεῦμα (pneuma), here = “spirits” (plural, unspecified/tested, some false) — 4:1,3. IMPORTANT TRANSLATOR RULE: unlike the Holy Spirit uses elsewhere in 1 John (which always require থাওয়াই অসেংবা in full per baseline), this plural, generic, tested-and-potentially-false use of πνεῦμα is correctly rendered with bare থাওয়াই (thawai). Risk: Critical (a misapplication in either direction — expanding to থাওয়াই অসেংবা here, or leaving Holy Spirit bare elsewhere — would corrupt the doctrine). Phase 2 processing must apply this distinction verse-by-verse, not term-by-term in isolation.
ψευδοπροφήτης (pseudoprophētēs, “false prophet”) — 4:1. Manipuri (NEW TERM): অতৈ ফোংদোকপা (atai phongdokpa), “false declarer,” built on baseline’s প্রophet root (তোঙান তোঙানবা ফোংদোকপা) with অতৈ (“false/counterfeit”) prefixed. Risk: Medium. Must be distinguished from a মৈবা/মৈবী (Sanamahi ritual specialist/priestess), who is a recognized traditional office, not automatically equated with “false prophet” — the biblical test is Christological content, not simply occupying a non-Christian religious role; care is needed not to appear to be issuing a blanket accusation against a specific traditional office but rather teaching a content-based test any spirit-claim must pass.
ὁμολογεῖ Ἰησοῦν Χριστὸν ἐν σαρκὶ ἐληλυθότα (“confesses Jesus Christ having come in the flesh”) — 4:2-3. This is 1 John’s precise incarnation-confession test. [BASELINE REUSE, Incarnation term] মীওইগী মহৈ লৌবা must appear here exactly, combined with the confession-verb ফোংনা হায়বা (see Core Passage 4:15). Risk: Critical. This is the single clearest textual link between 1 John’s doctrine and baseline’s existing Critical Incarnation entry; the baseline’s full warning against অবতার-framing applies at full force — a spirit/teacher denying that Jesus permanently and uniquely took on human flesh (as opposed to a repeatable divine descent, as in avatar theology) is, by 1 John’s own definition, “not from God” (4:3) and identified with the spirit of antichrist.
νικάω (nikaō, “overcome”) — 4:4, “you have overcome them, because he who is in you is greater than he who is in the world.” First occurrence of the term treated more fully at Chapter 5 below. Manipuri (NEW TERM): ন্গম্বা (ngamba), “to prevail/overcome.” Risk: Medium here; escalates in Chapter 5 (see below).
πνεῦμα τῆς ἀληθείας / πνεῦμα τῆς πλάνης (“spirit of truth / spirit of error”) — 4:6. Manipuri: অচুম্বাগী থাওয়াই (achumbagi thawai) / অশোয়বগী থাওয়াই (ashoibagi thawai, “spirit of deception”). Risk: High. ἀλήθεια (truth) here reuses the truth-term discussed under Chapter 5 below; note the direct contrast with any claim to alternative spiritual authority or revelation (whether maibi oracular utterance or an independent scriptural-philosophical truth-claim within Vaishnava tradition) — the test remains Christological content, not source-prestige.

Chapter 5 (5:1-21) — Overcoming the World, Threefold Witness, Eternal Life, Idols

γεννάω, “born of God” — 5:1,4,18; [reuse, Core Passage 4:7 term]. Note 5:18’s added assurance: “no one who is born of God sins,” meaning practices habitual, unrepentant sin as a lifestyle — this nuance (habitual/characteristic vs. occasional sin, cf. 1:8-10 and 2:1) requires a careful translator’s note to avoid contradiction with 1:8’s “if we say we have no sin.”
πίστις / πιστεύω — 5:1,4,5,10,13; [BASELINE REUSE] থাজবা.
νικάω (nikaō) / νίκη (nikē, “victory”) — 5:4-5, “whatever is born of God overcomes the world; and this is the victory that has overcome the world — our faith… Who is the one who overcomes the world? He who believes that Jesus is the Son of God.” [reuse from 4:4] ন্গম্বা; noun form: ন্গম্বগী মথৌ (ngambagi mathou) or “জয়” (joy, a widely used regional loanword meaning “victory,” transliterated). Risk: High (escalated from Medium at 4:4, since this is the curriculum’s own named doctrine “Overcoming the World” and its climactic thesis statement). This victory is specifically located in faith in Jesus’s Sonship, not ritual protective power sought via maibi mediation or Umang Lai propitiation against misfortune, nor devotional attainment within bhakti practice.
μαρτυρία / μαρτυρέω (“witness/testimony”) — 5:6-11, the “threefold witness” of the Spirit, the water, and the blood, and “the witness of God” concerning his Son. [reuse from Core Passage 4:14] সাক্ষী. Risk: Medium. The water (ὕδωρ, minor term, Manipuri ঈশিং, ising) and blood (see Chapter 1 entry) are historical referents (Christ’s baptism and death); this witness structure should not be confused with the layered testimony given by a maibi (trance utterance) or by scriptural/guru authority within Vaishnava tradition — it is testimony to a historical, once-for-all event and its meaning, not ongoing revelatory utterance.
ζωὴ αἰώνιος (zōē aiōnios, “eternal life”) — 5:11,13,20 (also 1:2; 2:25; 3:14-15). Literal: life of “the age [to come],” i.e., the age of God’s consummated reign. Semantic range: not mere unending duration but a qualitatively new, resurrection-order life, already possessed by believers in the present (a distinctively Johannine “already” emphasis) and to be fully realized. English variants: eternal life, everlasting life, life of the age to come. Manipuri (NEW TERM): লোমদবা হিংবা (lomdaba hingba), “unending/never-ceasing life.” Risk: Critical. This is the curriculum’s own named doctrine “Assurance of Salvation and Eternal Life” and carries the same Critical-tier collision risk baseline’s Salvation entry already documents: eternal life must be taught as reconciled, resurrection-order communion with the personal God through Christ’s historical work, never as মোক্ষ (liberation from the cycle of rebirth) nor as a devotee’s hoped-for eternal absorption into or nearness to Krishna’s presence in Vaikuntha/Goloka. 1 John’s added distinctive — that this life is a present possession, “these things I have written… so that you may know that you have eternal life” (5:13) — should be preserved carefully, since it gives a strong, positive answer to the assurance-of-standing anxiety that can otherwise attach to devotional-merit frameworks.
παρρησία — 5:14; [reuse], boldness in prayer/petition.
αἴτημα (aitēma, “request”) — 5:15, minor prayer-petition term. Manipuri: হায়জবা (haijaba), reusing baseline’s intercession root. Risk: Low.
ἁμαρτία πρὸς θάνατον (“sin unto/leading to death”) — 5:16-17. A difficult, debated phrase requiring pastoral care in teaching rather than a fixed lexical solution; Manipuri: সিবদা চিংশিনবা পাপ (sibada chingshinba pap), “sin that leads to death,” rendered descriptively. Risk: Medium. Flag for theologian review; avoid definitive interpretive commentary embedded in the translation itself (e.g., do not translate in a way that names a specific unforgivable category not clearly specified in the Greek).
ὁ πονηρός (ho ponēros, “the evil one”) — 5:18-19; a title for the devil, parallel to διάβολος (Chapter 3). Manipuri: অহুবা (ahuba), “the evil one.” Risk: Medium. Same caution as the Chapter 3 devil entry: a specific, personal, defeated enemy, not one being within a populated, negotiable spirit-world.
ὅλος ὁ κόσμος (“the whole world lies in [the power of] the evil one”) — 5:19; [reuse, negative “world-system” sense from Chapter 2].
ὁ ἀληθινός (“the true one” / “the true God”) — 5:20, “we are in him who is true… this is the true God and eternal life.” Manipuri: অহোয়বা তেংবাং মপু (ahoiba Tengban Mapu), “the true/genuine God,” built on the truth-root (অচুম্বা family) plus baseline’s God term. Risk: Critical. This closing identification of Jesus Christ as “the true God and eternal life” is one of the strongest single-verse assertions of Christ’s full deity in the New Testament and must be preserved with full force — directly reinforcing baseline’s Deity of Christ doctrine (Critical) and functioning as 1 John’s own capstone statement against any diminished, avatar-style, or merely-exalted-teacher Christology.
εἴδωλον (eidōlon, “idols”) — 5:21, the book’s final sentence: “Little children, keep yourselves from idols.” Literal: a cult image/representation of a deity. English variants: idols, images. Manipuri (NEW TERM): মুরুত্তি (murti), the widely used regional loanword for a consecrated deity-image. Risk: Critical. This is the single most direct closing collision point in the entire book for a Meitei audience: murti veneration is central and currently practiced in Manipuri Vaishnava temple worship (including in connection with Ras Lila devotional life), and carved/consecrated representations associated with Umang Lai deities and ancestral memory are present in Sanamahi sacred-grove practice. This verse must be handled with particular pastoral and theological care: the aim is exclusive worship of তেংবাং মপু, not a blanket dismissal of Meitei cultural heritage as such. This closing verse should be flagged for mandatory human theologian review with specific guidance on framing (invitation to exclusive worship, not cultural denunciation).

Summary Cross-Reference to Baseline Terms Reused Without Modification

The following baseline Romans terms recur in 1 John and must be used exactly as recorded in translation_memory.json: তেংবাং মপু (God), জিসু (Jesus), ক্রিস্তো (Christ), তেংবাং মপুগী মচানুপা (Son of God), ইপা (Father), থাওয়াই অসেংবা (Holy Spirit — Critical caveat re: bare থাওয়াই at 4:1,3), থাজবা (faith), পাপ (sin), অচুম্বা চৎনবিরাক (righteousness), অহানবা (salvation, conceptually present though σωτηρία itself is not a frequent noun in 1 John), লোইনবা (fellowship — risk elevated for this curriculum), অসেংবা (holy), য়াথাং (law), মীওইগী মহৈ লৌবা (incarnation — Critical, directly load-bearing at 4:2-3).

Library content is free and openly licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — share and adapt it for non-commercial use, with attribution to tri-bible.ai.